Tits or GTFO.

I didn't downvote, but half the time I do if the title specifically mentions a user here.

Just like everything you say or ever tried, wrong wrong wrong. Go comfort yourself with some more leftist propaganda. All you have is being someone else's useful idiot, and you can't even do that right.

People who ask questions over and over like you are fucking losers. From now on you're going to start noticing yourself do it too - it means you lack the imagination and understanding to put together arguments or generate novel thoughts... Like an NPC. You are almost certainly a miserable, fat, leftist failure IRL.

Honourless bottom feeders who even lie to themselves about being morally superior.

Good to know. There's plenty to be annoyed with already, there's no need for accounts like this to discredit our position by deliberately obfuscating immigration data.

I am not condoning incitement in any way, but I do think this person deserves to be killed, and I will figuratively gravedance if I outlive her.

That's because the female herd cares about status and trendiness and fitting in. They don't care about improvement, they care about popularity.

Hope everyone's making lists of the political activists who've abused their stations for the sake of ideology.

It seems they deliberately conflate

"wihich qualities do you / would you appreciate in a male you already decided you want to fuck" with "which qualities made you interested in the first place".

This is a really good point. I also want to add that self-reporting is not the same as reality. A lot of self-reporting is aspirational, i.e., "I want to be attracted to men who are kind, funny, and loyal... so this interviewer will validate me."

Damn, late to the party.

Ogre Battle: March of the Black Queen on SNES.

Exactly. It's super simple:

If you're not selecting for competence, then you're selecting for not competence.

I just realized from your comment that every attempt to call a guy out for "mansplaining" is a form of womansplaining in and of itself.

Okay, this cunt needs an ass-whoopin'.

They don't see a single cause to the recruiting problem, but pointed to a confluence of issues for Army recruiting, including partisan scrutiny of the service, a growing obesity epidemic and an underfunded public education system.

Deliberately wrong on all counts.

Mostly agreed.

People are people. Is there any reason to think the censorious, dissent-suppressing leftists of today are inherently different from those who were authoritarian collaborators 100 years ago? Maybe, but generally evolution doesn't work that fast. I tend to think the tools have changed but the people haven't, meaning that all recorded political and social history has been decided by the powerful.

Yes, and I can only press "Don't recommend channel" so many times.

The science is settled.

If someone says this, they are not a scientist.

And CS2 gun skins.

Incorrect. Name another law that compels action like taxation does. Taxation is unique in law.

I'd say it's worse, it's constructive armed robbery. You're coerced with the promise of force/incarceration if you don't get out your wallet.

Trans rights are human rights.

Worn by a hyena. Clown world has no limit, boys.

My bad, thought it came out Q1 this year for some reason.

Most of these are just wrong. Maybe Dave the Diver deserves a win, but that game is a huge collage of other games and I'm tired of every developer trying to cobble together a Frankenstein ripoff. The game has heart and polish though, no denying that.

Best game you suck at should be Elden Ring. That game is 100x better than Sifu, which I genuinely found boring.

Edit: My bad on Elden Ring, wrong year.

Same, brother. I was a diehard fan while growing up. I played virtually everything under the Squaresoft label, and it was almost all gold. Even the weaker entries were still good. People have mixed opinions on FF9 and 10, but I think after those two games Square plunged off a cliff into bloated melodrama, horrific writing, dipshit characters, and jank, unfun mechanics.