DEI is already doing that.
Nazis are communists. Pretending nazis were somehow right wing is the way commies deflect from the fact that every atrocity of the 20th century was perpetrated by leftist ideologies.
There are objective properties of any observable thing. Do you think aluminum and steel are the same because they are metals? What about sodium and steel?
Are you so brainmelted by modern nihilistic propaganda that you are unable to determine value in anything?
There is nothing useless about determining the relative values of a religion. Religions impact society, they provide moral structure. Do you think there is no functional difference between the moral structure of islam, or buddhism, or christianity? Or between catholicism and protestantism? If you can't understand the differences between those you are ignorant to the level that you have no right to speak about religion, and you might be retarded.
Re: the jews, you ignorant fuck. I'm one of the people here who is explicitly against the wehraboo "everything bad is joos" nonsense. You're just a tourist who provides no value to discourse here. And this is not a nazi board. This is a board that is built on a decade old fight against identity politics. The wehraboo brigaders from conpro are obnoxious tourists here to derail, just like YOU.
And thirty minutes later I came up with a simpler analogy for you. The difference between the left and right is perfectly exemplified by the difference between catholics and protestants. Catholics serve one centralized power. Protestants are free of that kind of structure.
While theoretically a throne like the pope's can be held by a moral man, human nature makes that highly unlikely and history has borne out proof in that the papacy has virtually always been used as a tool for the manipulaion of power, not for the good of the people. It is easily corruptible with very few points of failure. Meanwhile protestants can simply form their own churches at will, unbeholden to the corruptions of others. One corrupt protestant church can be rejected easily and ignored. One corrupt pope is catastrophic.
The catholic structure is a perfect example of the inherent failures of leftist ideology.
"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.
All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.
You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the scale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.
A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.
The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.
Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay vilage of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.
No, faggot. I will not start simping for authoritarian ideologies that only superficially oppose the current regime. Both belong in the fire.
Your goblinoid faction works at the behest of the globalists. Pushing leftist faggotry as "alt" right" is a fed psyop. Globalists do not care which of your retarded dogmas they have to pretend to care about to seize power. The concentration of power is the goal, because subverting power structures is what they do best.
You illiterate maggots infesting and destroying actual right wing organization attempts are the ones who must stop. You are no different. Your solution to government crimes is more government. That is THEIR GOAL. You are NO DIFFERENT. You have fallen for the trap and you serve the same masters as the commie useful idiots. You serve "them". No matter what label you want to use, the idiotic ((())) da joos or the correct label of globalists, the enemy you CLAIM to oppose is the one you are actually SERVING when you simp for leftist bullshit and try to derail or subvert actual right wing efforts.
Communism is about power, and manipulating masses to gain that power with oppressor / oppressed dogmatic propaganda. DEI is a modern contrivance that communism predates. Your understanding of the trappings of a modern form of the ideology misses the forest for the trees.
Relative cultural trappings do not define an ideology. Structures and effects do.
Nazis were literally just recolor variant commies. They all belong in the same woodchipper with the rest of the grubbling faggots who would be dictators. Sociopathy drives leftism, which is the great disease of the human mind.
If you can't raise your child to be at minimum a functioning member of society you almost certainly should not be a judge.
The problem is again, the idiocy of identity politics. They conflate the actions of a few, the actually good devout sikhs or the gurkhas, with the teeming mass of invaders that share nothing with those few honorable men besides skin color. The small business owner who migrated here in the 50s is not the same as the h1b goon here to spin out shit code ripped off from github.
"Based x minority group" doesn't exist. Individuals of that group may turn out good, but none of that is a valid excuse for tolerating mass immigration.
The effect is seen in people that either were never taught or never adopted principles. When someone holds principles that they actually believe in deeply, they aren't easily swayed - this is why you see this effect more often in women. I don't feel bad for them. People victimized by their own lack of sound moral character are no great loss.
The "libertarian" party is filled with dimwit faggots who only latched onto it because they like drugs.
Blame the "political compass" faggotry and the retarded, contradictory concept of "left-libertarian".
You are exactly like them.
Murder and self defense aren't decided by intent. They're decided by ethical justification. If you are put in a situation where you are being attacked and are legally in the right to defend yourself, it doesn't actually matter if you were thinking "I'm going to die" or "fuck this goon", or if you shot multiple times to stop the threat vs doing a mozambique drill because you wanted to make sure the goon died. A self defense shooting is justified with the actual actions taken by the attacker and defender.
They have revealed their true colors every couple of years for the last several decades at least. The floyd riots are no different than any of the many other mask off hypocrisy cascades of the ruling class.
The real reason older people trend conservative isn't because they get wiser, it's just that eventually one of the many obvious incidents breaks through the wall of ignorance for the people that refuse to believe things they didn't personally witness / ignore history.
I can't take trolling of this level seriously. If this post is actually serious you are the exact kind of fool that powered every bolshevik massacre of the 20th century.
Go change your fire alarm batteries.
This - is it a crime? Yes? Then why does the parituclar motivation matter? No? Then fuck off, opinions can't be illegal.
Hate crime is nothing more than a vehicle for thought crime.
Has there ever been a leftist with integrity? The supreme court has been used as a stepping stone to violate the constitution by the left since the early days of one of them deciding that they had the power to "interpret" plain language to mean something else entirely.
The legal profession in the US has been weaponized against the rights of the people. The founders always intended law to be written in plain language, and if we survive the coming hard times, far more explicitly limiting legislative fuckery and the powers of the courts in constitution 3.0 will be crucial.
Cato IS a brigader. He's a conpro poster, he probably doesn't even know what incident really created this board, let alone having been around for it a decade ago. Anyone with that board being a significant part of their post history isn't here for legitimate discourse.
my absolute power would be better than their absolute power, only the people I don't like would be put against the wall and killed
You want different things enforced by absolute rule but ultimately you want the same structure as other leftists, just with "your guy" in charge.
You really don't understand how politics works or the point of classification, or why the right left distinction exists. Or why right wing beliefs exist, at that. The only benevolent dictatorship that stays benevolent is one under a literal god. Leftists all share this slavering lust for the world to conform to their fantasy - right wing ideology recognizes and deals with human reality.
Actual right wing beliefs involve recognizing the nature of power and how it is inevitably corrupted. Knowing that the best way to preserve liberty is to deny the concentration of power entirely, to limit the government to only what is essential to preserve this. Your ideology is only superficially different from any other leftist.
And again, purist democracy is shit and I'm not defending it. It is not inherently right wing. Democracy is not an ideology, it is a singular element, like nationalism. You can have very right or left wing governments both be democracies, and the US is not supposed to be a democracy. Universal suffrage is a large part of the corruption of the US. You goons always want to argue against things I haven't said.
If you think all religions are equal you are truly retarded.
You may as well say water and bleach are equal drinks because they're both liquids.
"Don't know how many new voters" - they do. That is the point. They absolutely know and want the demographic replacement.
Confusing malice for ignorance. This is a common shield the left has used for decades - " never assume malice when it could be ignorance". No. When the function is malicious, treat it as such.
Right wing is a preference towards less government power. The extreme end of that is anarchism.
The current US government is very left wing. It is not as leftist as a monarchy. It is also very possible for democracy to be left aligned. None of these things are contradictory. That is why the simple scale works, where the reddit political "compass" does not. It correctly measures ideologies, instead of applying relative cultural shit.
For example, there is no "left libertarian". That is bullshit. Those goons don't hold to any actual principles of reduced government in any reasonable scale, they just want their drugs and legalized faggotry. They have no libertarian ideology, they are not "left libertarian", they're just degenerates. There is also no "auth right". There is functionally very little difference in behavior between natsoc fags and commie fags. The primary difference is not their methods, practices or core ideological structures, only their targets.
Ideology and methods are inextricably linked, not separate. Ideology defines methods. The reddit political compass is meme-grade bullshit, much like horseshoe theory.
You dimwit, you didn't read a single thing I posted did you. You are either incapable of comprehension or intellectually dishonest.
Leftism is the mindset of undeveloped children. All you want is power. Surely everything would be solved if YOU had power. No foresight, no thought beyond the immediate. You create total power and when things shift that total power is now in the hands of evil (if somehow a good person came to total power to begin with).
A developed adult human understands that people that seek power are inevitably the people that shouldn't have it. The solution isn't finding the one in a million uncorrupt dictator and banking on being lucky forever, because that ignores the reality of human nature. This is why the right wing knows that the real solution is decentralizing and minimizing power so that good people can live free of tyranny, and powerseeking sociopaths can't do significant damage before being caught out and stopped.
The right isn't about forgoing power and letting leftists have it. It's about DESTROYING centralized power so nobody can have it. Nothing I said is in favor of tolerating faggotry, nice attempt at sliding away from the actual discussion of ideology.
"You are fighting the wrong fight. Give total power to OUR guy, which absolutely won't end the same way EVERY DICTATORSHIP IN HISTORY HAS".
No. Fuck you, you fedboy goon. Do you actually not understand how concentrating power in one place just makes it much harder to fix when it is inevitably corrupted? Are you even capable of pattern recognition, have you ever actually studied history? No, this shit is obvious to people who actually pay attention.