Look at these subhuman faggots
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
Nazis were literally just recolor variant commies. They all belong in the same woodchipper with the rest of the grubbling faggots who would be dictators. Sociopathy drives leftism, which is the great disease of the human mind.
Nac Soc had a cult mentality where everything was devoted to the Fuhrer and the state. (Fascism obviously.) You see this in how Hannah Reitsch spoke about Hitler, for instance. This totalizes everything, including religious belief, which I couldn't accept.
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.
They were both command economies though. Just because one believed that the upper class was to be dismantled, and the other believed that the state should be unified with its people was different, both governments exercised complete control over their economy in the same way.
Communism is about power, and manipulating masses to gain that power with oppressor / oppressed dogmatic propaganda. DEI is a modern contrivance that communism predates. Your understanding of the trappings of a modern form of the ideology misses the forest for the trees.
Relative cultural trappings do not define an ideology. Structures and effects do.
You should be able to distinguish between slogans and reality.
That's why they invited Albert Einstein to come back to Germany?
And then invade very other country...
If that is the case, why did it take 251,933 years of human history before the first national socialist showed up? No doubt you might make analogies between national socialism and things that came before. But I bet there will be pretty major differences between the NSs of the 1930s and those your retrospectively baptize as such.
Don't some conservatives say that they are communists within their own family, but that this is exactly why it does not work on a larger scale?
You can think that but tactically you need to stop countersignaling "nazis". Because commies are the ones who are currently winning and in power. By attacking the enemies of commies you are de-facto supporting the commies, even when you say "both are bad".
This is the guy that argues that True Anarchism has never been tried, don't bother. He is just another shill.
No, faggot. I will not start simping for authoritarian ideologies that only superficially oppose the current regime. Both belong in the fire.
Your goblinoid faction works at the behest of the globalists. Pushing leftist faggotry as "alt" right" is a fed psyop. Globalists do not care which of your retarded dogmas they have to pretend to care about to seize power. The concentration of power is the goal, because subverting power structures is what they do best.
You illiterate maggots infesting and destroying actual right wing organization attempts are the ones who must stop. You are no different. Your solution to government crimes is more government. That is THEIR GOAL. You are NO DIFFERENT. You have fallen for the trap and you serve the same masters as the commie useful idiots. You serve "them". No matter what label you want to use, the idiotic ((())) da joos or the correct label of globalists, the enemy you CLAIM to oppose is the one you are actually SERVING when you simp for leftist bullshit and try to derail or subvert actual right wing efforts.
What is "actual right wing" to you? Is the civil rights act a part of it? Do women still get to vote? Do women get the final say in when and whom they will marry? Is "domestic violence" and "marital rape" a category of crime? Are neighborhoods allowed to keep blacks from moving in? Are stores and restaurants allowed to keep blacks out? Is miscegenation legal? Does the US still maintain a massive standing army? Are faggots allowed to buy babies?
Explain it to me, I'm listening and willing to be convinced.
And thirty minutes later I came up with a simpler analogy for you. The difference between the left and right is perfectly exemplified by the difference between catholics and protestants. Catholics serve one centralized power. Protestants are free of that kind of structure.
While theoretically a throne like the pope's can be held by a moral man, human nature makes that highly unlikely and history has borne out proof in that the papacy has virtually always been used as a tool for the manipulaion of power, not for the good of the people. It is easily corruptible with very few points of failure. Meanwhile protestants can simply form their own churches at will, unbeholden to the corruptions of others. One corrupt protestant church can be rejected easily and ignored. One corrupt pope is catastrophic.
The catholic structure is a perfect example of the inherent failures of leftist ideology.
"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.
All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.
You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the scale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.
A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.
The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.
Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay vilage of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.
Post Reported for:
Nothing is sufficiently insulting to be considered a slur.
National Socialists are not an identity group.
What constitutes a slur? Why don’t you make that list for transparency’s sake?