Look at these subhuman faggots
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
What is "actual right wing" to you? Is the civil rights act a part of it? Do women still get to vote? Do women get the final say in when and whom they will marry? Is "domestic violence" and "marital rape" a category of crime? Are neighborhoods allowed to keep blacks from moving in? Are stores and restaurants allowed to keep blacks out? Is miscegenation legal? Does the US still maintain a massive standing army? Are faggots allowed to buy babies?
Explain it to me, I'm listening and willing to be convinced.
And thirty minutes later I came up with a simpler analogy for you. The difference between the left and right is perfectly exemplified by the difference between catholics and protestants. Catholics serve one centralized power. Protestants are free of that kind of structure.
While theoretically a throne like the pope's can be held by a moral man, human nature makes that highly unlikely and history has borne out proof in that the papacy has virtually always been used as a tool for the manipulaion of power, not for the good of the people. It is easily corruptible with very few points of failure. Meanwhile protestants can simply form their own churches at will, unbeholden to the corruptions of others. One corrupt protestant church can be rejected easily and ignored. One corrupt pope is catastrophic.
The catholic structure is a perfect example of the inherent failures of leftist ideology.
"Actual right wing" is NOT APING LEFTIST POWER STRUCTURES. It is ACTUALLY OPPOSING THEM IDEOLOGICALLY. It is being for minimal government at the lowest possible level, maximum control in the hands of people, then local government. Decentralized power where government is even necessary, as government is a necessary evil for functional society.
All of your cultural elements and opinions on crime are up to locals to decide, not federals to dictate. Your faggotry is no different than the commies except which groups you target. When it is inevitably subverted, it is then immediately turned back against you - and everyone else. Actual right wing ideology recognizes that government is a necessary evil and is to be limited in power as much as possible.
You want your moral standards to be prevalent, build a community around them and enforce them within that community. But where you want power on the scale to dictate your will upon the world, functional adults recognize that this power will always, inevitably be corrupted, and the best way to manage that is to minimize the damage it can cause through decentralization. That is the right wing.
A perfect benevolent monarchy with an immortal king is the ideal form of government but that is a mythological fantasy or religion. Absolute power in the hands of government is societal suicide, because sociopaths will always subvert / corrupt power structures.
The left-right scale of political ideologies is not the reddit political compass retarded thing. It is a measure of government power. The extreme left is totalitarian. The extreme right is anarchist. That is the objective measure of political ideologies and understanding of human nature. Leftists are petulant, ignorant children who want to rule the world. The right is in opposition to this - nobody should rule the world. You may think your idea of how to best rule would work better than everyone else's, but so does every other power hungry fool. History has proven that sociopaths will ALWAYS manipulate that kind of foolishness to seize power.
Federal enforcement of tolerance for faggotry is, again, a massive overreach of government power. My preferred structures would be to for the vote to be earned through dangerous service like Heinlein outlined, as a refined return to the intended design of the US as a limited republic. But voting rights, racial issues and such are not inherently left or right wing elements. Those are culturally relative elements, not core structures of political ideology. If you want to use government force to make the world comply with your preferences, that is left wing. If you want the government to be forced to fuck off and let your community self-regulate, that is right wing. Your community could be a rainbow faggot parade or entirely reject faggotry, neither is inherently left or right. The difference between the left and the right is how you use government, not the details. Right wing structures tend towards stronger moral development because right wing ideologies come from stronger mental development. That doesn't make an anarchist gay vilage of a hundred people with basically no government left wing, nor does it make the national socialists of WW2 Germany right wing.
You are fighting the wrong fight.
The bad people will always try to amass power for themselves, and the only thing that can stop them is good people with power. The question isn't about whether or not power is bad, but how can we sort the good people from the bad people. The "principled" side forgoing pursuing power just lets the other side win by default.
Someone will always have power. Someone will always rule. Throwing a tantrum and giving up because reality doesn't work the way you want just makes you irrelevant.
Faggotry makes the nation worse. The tolerance of faggotry in neighboring community degrades yours no matter what your local controls say. Some behaviors and ideologies are like cancer, "tolerance" for them only works when they are small, hidden, and insignificant.
The lolbert philosophy is a placeholder for men who haven't found the courage to make value judgements.
You dimwit, you didn't read a single thing I posted did you. You are either incapable of comprehension or intellectually dishonest.
Leftism is the mindset of undeveloped children. All you want is power. Surely everything would be solved if YOU had power. No foresight, no thought beyond the immediate. You create total power and when things shift that total power is now in the hands of evil (if somehow a good person came to total power to begin with).
A developed adult human understands that people that seek power are inevitably the people that shouldn't have it. The solution isn't finding the one in a million uncorrupt dictator and banking on being lucky forever, because that ignores the reality of human nature. This is why the right wing knows that the real solution is decentralizing and minimizing power so that good people can live free of tyranny, and powerseeking sociopaths can't do significant damage before being caught out and stopped.
The right isn't about forgoing power and letting leftists have it. It's about DESTROYING centralized power so nobody can have it. Nothing I said is in favor of tolerating faggotry, nice attempt at sliding away from the actual discussion of ideology.
"You are fighting the wrong fight. Give total power to OUR guy, which absolutely won't end the same way EVERY DICTATORSHIP IN HISTORY HAS".
No. Fuck you, you fedboy goon. Do you actually not understand how concentrating power in one place just makes it much harder to fix when it is inevitably corrupted? Are you even capable of pattern recognition, have you ever actually studied history? No, this shit is obvious to people who actually pay attention.
your liberal ideas are retarded.
"wow, our liberal, decentralized, local government only city state is working so well!"
"oh crap, is that Huge Empire on the horizon, under the dictator who has 50 city states to draw from? looks like we'll have to ally up with our neighbors!"
"gee, organization sure is difficult when everyone insists they have equal word. if we don't do anything, Huge Empire will kill us all! i know, we can strive to agree on at least one person or group of people who can have the last word, so we can stop trifling and start defending ourselves!"
whoops, you just recreated government.