3
Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your skin color doesn’t make you better than anyone else.

If you're not a jr high school student, you face a lifetime of struggle.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump Derangement Syndrome comes in a TDS- variant for the left, and a TDS+ variant for the right.

They play both the left and the right as if they're skilled propagandists and manipulators.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

stand up for yourself and your beliefs,

Because I'm not a bigot

These are incompatible. If you're not a bigot, you tolerate other beliefs and opinions, no matter how odious. The moment you begin to be intolerant of other beliefs (pedophilia, for example), you are a bigot.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

You've read the definition of 'bigot', but you're not intolerant of some beliefs? Would you say you tolerate the belief of sex with children? Surely you're at least a little bigoted there?

I'm bigoted with quite a few beliefs and opinions. However, I do remember the propaganda push, starting say 30 to 40 years ago, to convince people they should accept all beliefs, except any promoting decency or normalcy. "bigoted against bigots"

6
Hand_Of_Node 6 points ago +6 / -0

Of course everyone is in agreement that any racial superiority is bad.

You're being sarcastic, right?

3
Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

That last "zinger" is his claim to accept pedophilia. You have to be a bigot to oppose the idea of adult sex with children. Google has softened this down, but even still...

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.

I obstinately oppose the belief or opinion that sex with children is fine. = bigot

I'm especially prejudiced and antagonistic towards child abusers. = bigot

Anyone who says they're not a bigot has zero ideological standards.

9
Hand_Of_Node 9 points ago +9 / -0

Political opponents are essentially your enemy. The left appears to recognize this reality. The right continues to lose in every area because it doesn't.

3
Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ukraine needs to appear to be winning in order to continue loaning them money and dumping older weapons on them.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just looked at that link again. Nothing else to say that wouldn't get another ban from this 'reddit-lite' sub.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you got that from some retard who uses reddit, tell them to get the hell out of your life. But there's no 'other person', is there.

1
Hand_Of_Node 1 point ago +1 / -0

We must try to fix the federal level.

Are you prepared to join in killing a minimum of 50,000 of them? They own the military, all federal law enforcement, and all intelligence agencies. It won't be easy, and would turn into a civil war before any fixing could be accomplished.

Even then, odds are incredibly high that they'd simply co-op the movement and bring the cabal right back in.

5
Hand_Of_Node 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Hillary is my good friend, and no one is getting arrested" - Trump

"I love the blacks" - Trump

"I'd fuck Ivanka if she weren't my daughter" - Trump, paraphrased (he said "date")

"Fuck those retarded 'patriots'" - Trump, probably

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haven't looked at windows or linux for years, but they were horribly offensive to the eye for decades. Also 'going wrong' quite often, especially with OS updates. The user interface itself was the definition of ugly, and the linux guys were all about spending hundreds of hours trying to get it to work.

The main question there is how much can you afford to spend? Sounds like a top of the line Mac is what you need, but those can be as expensive as it is to live on the California coast.

Recently lost the last two years of my life when I finally dropped my android phone. Really sucks to lose all your data, and I sympathize.

Good luck with whatever you decide. FrostedCricketFlakes has excellent info and advice in his comment!

5
Hand_Of_Node 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_200,q_80,w_200/f49cba5632840c08d292a44ba6080fdd.jpg

If you're wondering how seriously to take this 'piece of writing', you can be assured the level of professionalism in the above image, of and posted by the writer, tells you everything you want to know.

4
Hand_Of_Node 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lots of clueless people just have no idea. He got close to them, then executed a classic gun grab.

Shots were appropriate, even though his fellow retards want to excuse his actions.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's not 110% exactly in line with every single issue as us.

Or 55%, or even 11%. Did he ever do one thing that wasn't for the ultimate benefit of Israel or himself? Tbf, his ability to trigger the libs was rather amusing, but that was a distraction.

1
Hand_Of_Node 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the laugh.

2
Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no verses to cite, but I don't believe God endorses supporting and tolerating evil.

The funny (not 'haha') thing is, if the WEF succeeds in reducing earths human population down to 500 million, they'll eliminate most evil tolerators and evil doers. Aside from their own crimes and intentions, they'll automatically become the greatest force for good in thousands of years.

3
Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tolerating those people has been working out really well the past 50 years. We should keep doing it down to the last conservative.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›