This is the dominant subjugating the weak.
Dominant figures more successfully spread their genetics if they sabotaged their sexual competition.
They're hijacking the psychology of this - they're not technically doing this for the most part because they're just replacing the current people here with people from poorer countries that grow up more normally and have fewer pyschological issues - and passed a fitness test to get into the country.
The idea of sexually controlling the people below you is appealing to dominant personalities that view themselves as the people in charge.
Thus, were LGBTQ+ to not exist, would that make it even harder for straight men to compete for women?
They're pushing 2 things simultaneously.
- that being straight and all straight interactions are bad - a non-stop series of depictions of all man/woman interactions that are all harrassment, rape, humiliating, etc.
- that you can escape this straight nightmare by being gay/trans/non-binary a choice that effectively sterilizes you except in a few cases.
These people make the worst depiction of Trump look mature and egalitarian.
These are all self-projection on their part - if you've seen this in action they want to scream their obscenities at you at work and force you to endure it in silence. They want to abuse men at work at astronomical levels. They want to run over everyone else's boundaries like the psycho's they are.
They need to be the 100% center of attention at all times and nothing that doesn't benefit them is allowed.
Tell me this is not a man.
https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2027449/nina-jankowicz-poses-official-photo.jpg?w=1600&h=900&q=88&f=c981d161cbc5ad29092f7c881610cea5
Literally sociopathic pattern.
If they see something that humanizes people, they get enraged and attacked it.
They are literally telling you that chopping your genitals off with trans must be accept with one hand - while with the other hand they are telling you it's bad and wrong to be a boy or a girl.
The Walt Disney Co. may be able to maintain its quasi-independent status thanks to the language of the 1967 state law which created the Reedy Creek Improvement District.
Then they passed a new state law...that's how that works. New laws can be passed that override old laws.
They haven't really been shy that their goal is to install a woman into the presidency, biden will have some sort of big public moment of senility and be unable to continue and kamala will be installed as the president.
I wonder if this is why they keep extending but not paying off the student loans, so they can do the "look at what women will do for you that men won't" moment right after she's installed.
The republicans of course are running around doing everything they can to paint themselves as villains, in minnesota they're trying to repeal some voter-passed thing preventing huge rent increases screaming "SOMETIMES VOTERS MAKE MISTAKES".
Yeah, the thing is, they haven't actually been banning hate groups. They've been banning competing hate groups.
If you banned hate groups including feminists it might work.
Also if they killed twitter entirely that would definitely be fine with me.
You're displaying submission to their ideology, so they'll take that as proof they should keep going.
Of course I'm hetronormative. That's normal. I'm also no-cancer-normative as I believe having to cut off body parts to avoid a disease is sad and bad thing.
There's honestly a question of whether endlessly pontification on the history of slavery is just a mechanism to "keep black people in their place".
When societies want intellectuals they teach them a positive backstory of their relatives being intellectuals. When societies want inventors same thing. Soldiers, same thing
When society wants slaves they teach them all about slavery.
The only racial group that's dramatically improved their incomes over the last 50 years is asians / indians. Went from average/low to near the top. You don't see them getting told their history is one of slavery.
...there were repeated use of racial and ethnic stereotypes that were in actual assignments.’ ‘The use of the word “plantation” and things of that nature,’ Robinson said. ‘In addition to the racial and ethnic stereotypes, there was an insensitivity to socioeconomic status and as well as a disregard for the children who weren’t physically in the classroom.’
You can't even mock them because there's no point where what they're doing could be more stupid. It's like dealing with the mob, except it's all preschool children.
So it's almost, aaalmost at the point of awareness
It's not a cutesy thing they don't quite get, though the person saying it may or may not be aware of it because our conscious minds are not nceessarily aware of the other processes in the brain, they're always are of the groupthink and powertrip.
The point is to say 2 contradictory things and getting away with it.
Forcing people to not call someone a man os demonstrating power because you told others what to do.
Following up with a demonstration that you don't have to follow those rules by calling him a man yourself, is another demonstration of power.
The problem for them is this either creates or attracts people with serious mental disorders.
She was fully aware that pretty much any male could physically dominate her, at will.
These are feminist tactics to manipulate you. They know as a man you naturally seek to protect women, while never expecting the same from them.
Women develop these patterns growing up with other women. Just this I was studying for traing and went to the library for a change of scenery and at some point I noticed a group of not-attractive teenage girls was chatting behind me. One of them starts saying that some girl who isn't there is her friend friend forever and - then the queen bee of the group starts talking over her, angrily, telling her she needs to break up with her "she's not worth it". She gets really angry, she clearly believes she has every right to tell the other girl who she should and shouldn't be friends with.
This is the kind of thing that forms of womens actual fear. Group ostrasization because of association with someone the group doesn't like - often entirely unexpectedly. One day you think things are fine, the next the whole group is threatening to abandon her because she was seen with someone they don't like.
For the purposes of this work, we will define a user perceived as being a woman as an account that is a member of at least two women-oriented subreddits and has overall positive karma in women-oriented subreddits.
"woman" is defined as man-hating political activist.
Act shocked that when they bully people, those people respond with negativity. Insist their bullying users need "special protection" to stop their victims from responding to getting bullied.
Just another day on reddit I guess?
It's interesting that it looks like reddit finally got around to banning some of the feminist extremists.
A bunch of us who used to moderate gender critical/radical feminist communities on reddit just got banned out of the blue. Maybe we're contributing to that banned "14k accounts for posting hateful content directed at women"...
Honestly it seems like they target dumb stuff to replace it with their own dumb stuff.
Has you ever used anything above algebra in your entire life? All the time I spent in various calc and discrete math class was a 100% waste of time I could have better spent on literally anything else whatsoever.
Playing video games was literally a better use of time as it promoted problem solving and logical thinking.
Why do I feel like we're back to shitty political manipulators spamming out teenage sex stuff again? Like the left is getting people angry with them for trying to groom kids into other sexualities, so...now it's the rights turn to do the same shit?
Honestly, shut the fuck up.