No, investors are the most expensive way to raise funds. Debt is the cheapest. All major corporations hold a debt-to-equity ratio that is considered reasonable for their industry.
The reason for this often comes down to the tax savings on interest but also because interest rates tends to be lower than the expected return on equity.
I suspect just more strain on the healthcare system with visits to hospitals or disabled kids.
I just browsed their Q3 statements. They are pretty healthy. Just normal borrowing. Nothing alarming going on.
I'm really curious what happens if you take the drugs past 10 weeks... Or what could happen... Expect a lot of women to do this.
Great, your worldview is worthless too because you have 0 power to do anything about your worldview, just like mine. Welcome to the club.
I don't believe in most human rights. Who dictates what a right is? Someone else. You think I support Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Not a chance. You think I support the UN's Human Rights? Not a chance. You think I support the USA's Bill of Rights with amendments like the 19th? Not a chance. Just because a government says you have a right doesn't mean it's morally right so why would I support them? And further to that, just because a government says you have a right doesn't mean they will respect it when the time comes. What good then are the concept of human rights when many are morally wrong?
And I know full well anyone who supposedly believes in my rights will take them away at a moment's convenience so the only true way to guarantee a "right" is to have the power to guarantee it. The second your government decides it doesn't want to guarantee you your rights, they are gone unless you have the power to guarantee them yourself. You only have "rights" because your "rights" happen to align with what the powers that give you your rights happen to agree you should have. That's hardly much assurance. The second they don't want you to have your rights, you don't have any.
Calling for violence? Terrorism isn't violence brah. Remember, the Truckers? They are terrorists yet they were peaceful? Remember the Proud Boys? They are terrorists in Canada, yet they were peaceful. No need to try to get me banned by insinuating I was "calling for violence' by saying Westerners should be disobeying their government.
Right as in ability to do something not right as in what is morally right or wrong. Do you believe all human rights are morally right? Do you believe all laws are right? So just because the UN gets together and says X is a "human right" that means unobjectively it is morally right because your morals are dictated by the UN? Something can be a "right" and still be morally wrong just as how you can have the right to do something justified by the power to do it but such action is not morally right even if I can't stop you from doing said action. Morals are irrelevant to whether something can or cannot do something if they don't adhere to such morals. For the vast majority of people with power, you'll find no set of principals actually guide their actions other than what will enhances their own wealth and power though they will argue the moral justification of whatever action they take to those who would judge their action as morally wrong.
Let me make it clear for you.
- Do I believe pedophilia is morally right? No.
- Do I believe beating an unruly wife is morally right? It can be depending on what exactly she has done to deserve it.
- Do I believe transexuals should have a right to not be discriminated against? No.
- Do I believe women deserve "equal rights" to men? No.
- Do I believe homosexuals deserve "equal rights" to heterosexuals? No.
- Do I believe it is morally right to discriminate based on race? Yes.
Ahh, you're stuck on semantics. Got it.
Cool, and you think Epstein cared about your son or daughter's rights? He'd have trafficked them all the same.
If anything, she should be suing her parents.
What I'm saying is difficult for you to understand. Under the law, pedestrians have the "right of-way" compared to automobiles for traversing roads. Would you start crossing a street in the way of an automobile because of your "right"? Only a fool would. If you get hit by an automobile moving at adequate speed, your "right" is worthless because you'll be dead.
Is it morally right for the automobile to hit you? No and not only that it is also illegal and against the law but that doesn't stop people from doing it anyway, perhaps without even realizing they're doing it. Perhaps with rationalizing it in their mind that you "jumped out without them being able to react". However they wish to justify their actions, it is irrelevant to the fact you are now dead. What good is your right in this circumstance? It is worthless.
You must live your life not based on concepts of "rights" but on actual realities. Your actions should be controlled by these realities not these "rights".
It doesn't matter what you think of Joe Biden. Joe Biden currently has executive power in the country. You can think he's an evil man all you want but your thought is worthless. It doesn't matter how right or wrong you are, you are living under the Joe Biden government and this government has power over you. Don't pay your taxes? The IRS will come knocking. Don't respect a law Joe Biden makes? The police will come knocking. Joe Biden's power is irrespective of what you think of him so living your life based on whether you think Joe Biden is evil or good is irrelevant. You change nothing.
If you lived in a society where beating an unruly woman was legal such as say in many parts of the world or even western countries up until a century ago, then it doesn't matter whether you think it's right or wrong, you would be able to do it. Imagine being a feminist in Afghanistan and saying it's wrong for the Taliban to kick women out of school. You might get killed for it. What good is a "woman's right to education" in Afghanistan?
Rights are worthless in this regard. All that matters is who has power in order to create the system of right and wrong and then enforce it upon others.
I don't like Joe Biden but I can't deny his masters have power. Does believing he was illegally elected or whatever you believe about Joe Biden change the fact he's the one with executive power?
Because if I believe in human rights no one will turn around and abuse me when they feel like it any different? Rights are a worthless concept. The only real right is power. If you have power, you make the rules.
It's because there very much is a distinction between a tradcuck and a tradcon. Just like how there's a distinction between a Classical Liberal and a Modern Liberal (leftist). People who despise tradcucks often associate all tradcons with tradcucks, just like how people who despise Marxists often associate all Liberals with Marxism even though Classical Liberals aren't really Marxists.
It's basically the same dynamic.
Here's how you can tell a tradcuck from a tradcon (though the differences vary). Ask a tradcon if he thinks a wife should have duty to provide sex for her husband. If he says no, that's rape and is wrong, he's a tradcuck. This is especially true of Christians like Torba because the bible literally says in different words that a woman's duty is to provide sex which is likely where such duty came into fruition in the past. A true tradcon would say yes, that's how things used to be. If she isn't doing her duty she should be punished also.
The big difference between a tradcuck and a tradcon is that a tradcon believes in assuring women provide adequate value to men through BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE to provide such value, whether that's through physical beatings of women, the judicial system or some form of coercion such as financial coercion. A tradcuck believes in all the traditional gender roles without women being held accountable to their role. Tradcucks are basically peak simps. They are nothing more than slaves to women and the best kind of slave because they don't even realize they are a slave. Women love tradcucks but tradcucks are no friend of men. Tradcucks are literally the worst kind of male feminist.
It was sarcasm.
Damn, I would have thought they wanted him to go for retraining for being too pro-Jewish.
I have no idea what's going on. Can someone summarize?
It only applies to powers that have access to violence. Governments? Yes. Other arenas? No.
In the Quran, it teaches Muslims to adhere to the rules of foreigners when you're in their countries in order to subvert and conquer them easier by blending in. The fact he's a mayor and is destroying the city from within aligns perfectly with the Quran. He doesn't actually need to follow the values/beliefs of the Quran while he's busy fighting the war against the enemy in their own lands. He's not a disgrace, he's actually doing precisely what the Quran commands of him.
Funny how when White Nationalists convince people of a belief system, it's grooming and exploitation but when Marxist Antifas do it, there's nothing wrong with it, despite these people committing terrorist acts.
Committing terrorist acts is precisely what most westerners should be doing.
That's nice of the Taliban.
Usually, once a day before I go to bed. I've done no porn before for a full year (including no jerking off either) and honestly, it made no difference. When you're single and not looking you might as well just jerk off and watch porn. If you're out and about looking for women, I'd recommend against it just because the sex is better when you don't jerk off so much. When I was jerking off daily and still fucking women in one-night-stands, I'd have to drop cialis to get hard even for the hottest of chicks because I was just so numb to any feeling both emotionally and physically that I could barely stay hard or get any enjoyment out of it. That's less to do with porn though and more to do with just the superficiality of one-night stands. The whole dating environment was just too emotionally void of anything good that I stopped dating and going out to find women altogether. I haven't bothered for almost 2 years now. Porn and jerking off makes 0 difference if you aren't out trying to find women.
The background is better on the original. The AI generated person is better. What's so hard to understand here people. It's pretty fucking obvious.
Like the January 6th protestors who are in prison? The Canadian truckers who had their bank accounts frozen? You talk but everything you say is as meaningless as your rights.