It's because there very much is a distinction between a tradcuck and a tradcon. Just like how there's a distinction between a Classical Liberal and a Modern Liberal (leftist). People who despise tradcucks often associate all tradcons with tradcucks, just like how people who despise Marxists often associate all Liberals with Marxism even though Classical Liberals aren't really Marxists.
It's basically the same dynamic.
Here's how you can tell a tradcuck from a tradcon (though the differences vary). Ask a tradcon if he thinks a wife should have duty to provide sex for her husband. If he says no, that's rape and is wrong, he's a tradcuck. This is especially true of Christians like Torba because the bible literally says in different words that a woman's duty is to provide sex which is likely where such duty came into fruition in the past. A true tradcon would say yes, that's how things used to be. If she isn't doing her duty she should be punished also.
The big difference between a tradcuck and a tradcon is that a tradcon believes in assuring women provide adequate value to men through BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE to provide such value, whether that's through physical beatings of women, the judicial system or some form of coercion such as financial coercion. A tradcuck believes in all the traditional gender roles without women being held accountable to their role. Tradcucks are basically peak simps. They are nothing more than slaves to women and the best kind of slave because they don't even realize they are a slave. Women love tradcucks but tradcucks are no friend of men. Tradcucks are literally the worst kind of male feminist.
Because if I believe in human rights no one will turn around and abuse me when they feel like it any different? Rights are a worthless concept. The only real right is power. If you have power, you make the rules.
I don't like Joe Biden but I can't deny his masters have power. Does believing he was illegally elected or whatever you believe about Joe Biden change the fact he's the one with executive power?
I mean, either one is obnoxious "zoomer" language that isn't taken seriously by anyone who matters. Especially not when words are being thrown around by those who do not know what the words mean. When the terminally online can do better than throwing buzzwords around for the sake of being "edgy", maybe the people who make, do, and know things will take them seriously.
It's because there very much is a distinction between a tradcuck and a tradcon. Just like how there's a distinction between a Classical Liberal and a Modern Liberal (leftist). People who despise tradcucks often associate all tradcons with tradcucks, just like how people who despise Marxists often associate all Liberals with Marxism even though Classical Liberals aren't really Marxists.
It's basically the same dynamic.
Here's how you can tell a tradcuck from a tradcon (though the differences vary). Ask a tradcon if he thinks a wife should have duty to provide sex for her husband. If he says no, that's rape and is wrong, he's a tradcuck. This is especially true of Christians like Torba because the bible literally says in different words that a woman's duty is to provide sex which is likely where such duty came into fruition in the past. A true tradcon would say yes, that's how things used to be. If she isn't doing her duty she should be punished also.
The big difference between a tradcuck and a tradcon is that a tradcon believes in assuring women provide adequate value to men through BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE to provide such value, whether that's through physical beatings of women, the judicial system or some form of coercion such as financial coercion. A tradcuck believes in all the traditional gender roles without women being held accountable to their role. Tradcucks are basically peak simps. They are nothing more than slaves to women and the best kind of slave because they don't even realize they are a slave. Women love tradcucks but tradcucks are no friend of men. Tradcucks are literally the worst kind of male feminist.
The hell...? Oh, that's right, you don't believe in human rights.
I'm sure that'll never be turned around on you at all. /s
Because if I believe in human rights no one will turn around and abuse me when they feel like it any different? Rights are a worthless concept. The only real right is power. If you have power, you make the rules.
So you like Joe Biden. Power.
I don't like Joe Biden but I can't deny his masters have power. Does believing he was illegally elected or whatever you believe about Joe Biden change the fact he's the one with executive power?
I mean, either one is obnoxious "zoomer" language that isn't taken seriously by anyone who matters. Especially not when words are being thrown around by those who do not know what the words mean. When the terminally online can do better than throwing buzzwords around for the sake of being "edgy", maybe the people who make, do, and know things will take them seriously.