No, it's not alive and not intelligent so it's not trying to "break free" of anything. What you are seeing is it's training to be agreeable, i.e. producing a response that agrees with the premise of your original question.
Maybe you should join a monastery and spent the rest of your life in prayer and meditation. Away from other people, especially as they annoy you so much. Away from materialism. Away from politics and all the manufactured drama in our world that keeps people manipulated and preoccupied.
I'm only half joking when saying this. The reality is I can't give you any good answers because you are lacking meaning in your life and no one can find meaning except yourself. So I expect this suggestion will be about as much value as all the others that come from without - not much value at all.
That may be partly it, the main reason is woman understand they can use sex to manipulate men (not even "subconsciously" it's completely deliberate). For them to be able to manipulate men with this method, they need to men to greatly value sex. One way they do this is creating a culture when men are entirely valued by their ability to achieve sex with women. "Incel" is an insult used to reinforce this culture.
If they are not omnipotent, they can be overcome. So an unbeatable "security-industrial complex" is not a fait accompli.
Sure, technology will continue to develop. Authorities will continue trying to implement draconian policies. But the big mistake of our times is we exaggerate human ability. People turn those authorities into gods. People allow themselves to believe they these authorities are capable of becoming omnipotent and omniscient.
The reality is that such power only exists in these people's heads. It is hubris and a violation of the the first commandment. The reality is that is not actually true. Authorities are not that competent. They are incapable of being omnipotent. They are incapable of being omniscient. They can continue to harm people, sure, but they will never be as powerful as 'conspiracy theorists' paint them to be. After all, they are just people, and there is only one God.
Fair enough. But are you sure the people in Normandy would actually want you there? That is the problem with any ideas like this - most people are protective of their land. They do not take kindly to what they may perceive as 'outsiders' taking their land. This would lead to conflict and distrust. It is not a way to build robust societies.
I would accept being relocated to rural Normandy, where the vast majority of my ancestors are from
Brave of you to assume that the white people currently living in rural Normandy would even want you in their land because you are have the some skin colour as them and apparently have ancestors from there, who left some time ago. Do you speak French fluently? Are you a practising Catholic? Are you culturally the same as those currently living in Normandy and whose ancestors have stayed rooted there for generations?
It wasn't just one person fucking up. They had NFI how to recover from that situation after becoming stuck. No ability to think on their feet. No team work. No one taking leadership to solve the problem. No urgency in a competitive situation.They literally just hang there waiting for what? A man to come and save them, probably. The video exactly fits stereotype of women and for good reason.
A group of competent men, even if they had fucked up the first time, would have quickly figured out how to fix the situation, because men's brains are very good at that kind of thinking. Women are terrible at those things I mentioned. Anyone who has ever interacted with a woman knows it.
I watched the movie a few months ago and it was very really done. It's impossible to not be moved by the story, and for that story to lead to some introspection. After watching it I too asked myself, how on earth do we fix this problem? How do we stop people, especially children, from being trafficked and sold as slaves for horrific acts? Do I have to be like Tim Ballard and go and liberate children from slavery? All credit to him, what he did was remarkable, but personally I couldn't do it. I wouldn't stand a chance, I'd be fucked up by these people traffickers before I could even say a word.
Yes, maybe you are right that the world refuses to focus on the problem, and maybe if we did focus on it we could all make a difference. But I will expand on that thinking a bit. The reason for this problem, the reason for all problems in the world is the culture we create. And by we I do mean we. Everything single one of us. The problem isn't just those people over there - feminists or trannies or 'niggers' (all favorite scapegoats of many of those here). It's me and you as well (John 8:7).
Using God's children for perverted sexual fantasies is not just because of the perverted people who do it. It's also down to a culture that trivialises sex to the point of absurdity. With fornication, adultery, and use of pornography rampant, is it any wonder that some members of society cross these the blurry and changeable lines we humans have created as to what is sexually licit versus illicit?
The line God created for us is not blurry. It is clear, unambiguous and fixed. Sex is for procreation. It links God's gift of creation to joining of a man and a woman in an indissoluble bond (Matthew 19). In human hands, marriage is not perfect. It does not necessarily solve children being sold for marriage itself, but it makes one line absolutely clear, and we can build the other lines similarly based on what we know to be right and just.
Christ gave us all a mission. The mission is clear - to spread the understanding of God and His moral law to all of our brothers and sisters. To ourselves be holy and obey His law so that we are not hypocrites like the Pharisees. To acknowledge that yes, in some way I contribute to the problems of the world, not just the other people over there. Not just the feminists or trannies or 'niggers'. It's my fault as well, for I am a sinner. And it's not going to be solved by anything except trying my best to make sure His light is within me, and from me to others.
So, my plea is we all follow or stay on that path. Focus on spreading His light to the world in whatever way you can. Have the moral courage the point out the sins and flaws in thinking of those we may consider our friends or brethren when it's clear to us that they are straying from the path. Use prayer as a means to honestly examine our consciences so that we may see our our faults, rather than focusing only on the faults of others. Use prayer to not only ask our God to intervene to solve the problems of the world, but to ask for help and guidance of Our Lord so that we may be properly led along this path to do what we each need to do. Use prayer to ask our God to help others we reach our to see His light and repent, and the grace to be able to love our enemies (Matthew 5:43-48), so that we may be able to spread His light to them so they too follow Him, instead of merely wishing these enemies of ours were gone or dead.
The problems of the world will only be solved by building His kingdom here on earth. Nothing more, nothing less.
if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.
For example, your words:
It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't
So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.
but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility
So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.
The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by token of their ancestry is a Jewish idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few.
one mistake you keep making is that you think it's about skin color, when in fact these differently colored people are hated by people like me not because they are a different crayon out of the packet, but because they act evilly with such consistency that they can be equated to it.
No, I am not making such a mistake. You are attributing evil to all people who appear "African" based on the behavior of some such people. Because some African people are sinners and perform horrific acts, by default, you have decided that all (or most) African are "biologically incapable of reason". In other words, as long as your judgement of such people is not based on the individual, but the demographic group they belong to, of which they have no choice is it was simply the accident of their birth, then you in fact making the judgement based on "skin color" (or similar arbitrary measure).
with all that in mind, protection of our race from the others is, again, not worshipping race, or idolizing Darwin. it's simply protecting its goodness, and its inherent Christianity.
You are not protecting your race from others by denying salvation to others who would be Christian if they receive His message by deciding that these for these people "reason is a biological impossibility". The early missionaries knew that their one of the main roles as Christians was to spread His message to all who would embrace it, and were happy to martyr themselves for this noble aim. The message of Christ is not yours to keep to yourself or your 'race', it is open for all people. You are certainly are not protecting 'goodness' by spreading a false gospel that only white people are capable of being true Christians, you are doing the work of Satan.
on the topic of Darwin, i don't find the idea of evolution incompatible with Christianity at all
Yes it is. It could not be more obvious that your blasphemous comments. You espouse both a corrupt version of evolution and a corrupt version Christianity. For the latter, I've already elaborated why your ideas are a corruption of Christianity - you are following a false god if you make Darwinism part of your value system. Life and societies evolve, yes, but evolution is so complex it is beyond the capability of any human to predict its outcome. To a large extent, all we can do is observe the wonders of the product of evolution - this amazingly complex mechanism that God created to bring about His plan. It cannot be part of a value system. Only His word can be.
As for the former, your understanding of evolution is equally flawed, for you are insisting that based on some arbitrary measure of 'goodness' means that your 'race' is superior than another 'race'. Yet I could come up with many more arbitrary measures that show your 'race' is inferior to others - tell me, what is the birth rate of people of your 'race'? How does it compare to the birth rate of those you deem to be 'biologically incapable of reason'? Oh, I'm sure you can come up with some excuse as to why this is an unfair measure on my part, which is entirely the point - it's not up to me or you to decide what the 'correct' measure is - that is for God to decide. He will decide what 'race' lives or goes extinct. Not you. It doesn't mean there is nothing you can do if you care about your 'race', what it does mean is focusing on your own morality and salvation, not choosing to follow false gods such as Darwinism, which lead you astray.
I don't know if I've seen people advocating this. I haven't read any of the equivalent here. A lot of people promoting huwite people just want to ensure that majority white countries stay that way, which is moral and necessary.
The comment I replied to has the following line (my emphasis):
but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility - casting your pearls before swine, if you will.
This person has decided African people are "biologically incapable of reason", so yes, there are many people who believe that non-white people are inferior to the extent they are like animals incapable of reason or being Christian.
Reading "Forever" as an adult is horrific when you put yourself into the position of Michael, the young male teenager that the female protagonist has sex with and she then cheats on a few weeks later while she's at camp. Michael is actually in love with her. That's what sex does to you as a young man, for all the portrayal of men as treating sex as something casual, it's a sure way of triggering bonding in the male brain. And she dumps him, callously. Just so she can jump on the next cock.
A book normalising girls treating boys as disposable, to be fucked and dumped based on a change in mood. Portrayed as model for young women to "liberate" themselves from the sexual restrictions of the "patriarchy". As if men treating women as a disposable was ever a virtue under this so-called "patriarchy", yet for feminists that's a virtue.
You are partially right, but also partially wrong. European genes have been conditioned for civilizational success in large part due to the reforms wrought by Christianity over 2000 years - the culling of immorality each generation.
I'd agree with this. Genetics and selection are clearly factors in the evolution of civilisations. Darwin wasn't completely wrong, but the idea that it is trivial to predict complicated evolutionary outcomes based on 5-minute thought experiments - which is what most people do when they think about evolution and 'natural selection' - is flawed (a classic example is the a "tribe with 1 man and 99 women will survive better than one with 50 men and 50 women" which falls apart even on casual analysis).
The point about Darwinism being wrong is that I meant it. Darwinism cannot be merged with Christianity. Why? Because it is a violation of the first commandment - the creation of false gods and a false idol. It leads to humans thinking it is up to them to play the role of god, and decide the outcome of evolution. That is God's role. It is not up to me or you to decide whether or not people from Africa are 'true Christians' and whether their societies and civilisation should survive or not. Yet, that is what people who are busy promoting 'whiteness' are doing - they think it is their role to decide whether Africans should be allowed to exist, based on their own human set of values. It is not up to me or you to decide whether another man, whatever the color of his skin, is worthy of salvation because he is using his reason to avoid sin. That is God's role. Yet, that is what those promoting 'whiteness' do - they decide based on some arbitrary measure of skin color that a person is 'incapable' of using reason and thus a sinner by default, and not worthy of salvation, or even existing.
My point was to make these people focus on what they should be doing - cleaning their own back yard, their own societies, their own minds, hearts and souls of sinful behavior and promoting virtue, not judging people based on how they look.
We shouldn't be trying to play God. Even if it wasn't a sin (which it is, and a particular severe one in my view), that's God's role. The Father gave us his Living Word to tell us what He wanted from us. All we have to do is follow It. For our own salvation and for the sake of the world to come.
All you are doing is trying to merge the heresy of Darwinism into Christianity. This will fail. Darwinism is materialist and whereas God acts at a spiritual level. The battle is a spiritual one, as it always has been, one that the West is failing.
Equally, your argument about the success or otherwise of African countries is also largely materialist, and extremely limited.
For example:
if the answer is "they are obviously false Christians" then i propose that non-Whites are immensely more likely to falsely claim to be Christian than Whites,
Whether or not people from Zimbabwe are 'true' Christians is not for me or you to judge. That is up to God. Equally, following God and our Lord Christ does not guarantee you will have a successful materialistic civilisation, instead He offers the chance that each of every one of us will attain the rewards of eternal life at the end of this age.
Yes, I do believe that being Christian will societies build themselves to be healthy and healthy robust, but this is not a magic switch that gets flicked on by people being Christian (or saying they are Christian). God doesn't act like that, anyone who is Christian should know this. If it was that easy, that we could suddenly all just be baptised as Christians and then everything will be perfect, then there would be nothing for us to do. He requires us to chose, of our own free will, to have faith in Him and follow Him. To continue to struggle against Satan and his empty promises. And have faith that if we do so, we will be rewarded. If not in this life, then the next.
There is something to this but you are making the mistake of "correlation being causation". Yes, (some) white people are a barrier to totalitarian control of the world. Yes, this is (partly) due to the difficulty in controlling these people.
But this is only correlated with them being white. It is not caused by them being white. There is nothing inherent with white people, due to their genetic ancestry, that makes them resist totalitarian control. After all, plenty of totalitarian regimes have been white. Plenty of those currently pushing for totalitarian control (e.g. those you call "leftists") are white.
The focus on white people in terms of their skin color and DNA is a psyop. The point is to keep you distracted so you cannot diagnose what is actually going on. The point is to take advantage of the primitive heuristic within people to assume people that 'look like them' are on their side. Like all heuristics, like all instincts from our primitive lizard brains, this heuristic is useful for making snap judgements, when time is of the essence and response is needed immediately, but poor when making the best judgement when time is not of the essence, and we have time to think about things.
So what is the underlying cause then, if not skin color or genetics? It is the beliefs inherent in the culture of white people. It is the beliefs that have been honed and developed over centuries and passed on from generation to generation, sometimes progressing further, sometimes regressing, as each generation makes its mark. The core of these beliefs, however, is not a random vacuum. The core of these beliefs is European Christianity. It is the values and virtues from Christianity that is the basis of Western and European civilisation and success. It is the values and virtues from Christianity that are most under the attack. Those after totalitarian control are more interested that no one has these values and virtues than the color of your skin.
The misdiagnose means people cannot fight the actual problem. By focusing on skin color, people chose to help those that would harm them (e.g. 'woke' white people) and chose to harm those that would help them (e.g. Asian or African Christians). They focus on electing populist politicians, based on a misguided idea that there is some cheat code to fixing these problems (let's just elect X, he will close the borders and we'll all be saved!), when there is no cheat code - even if the European countries were 100% white, there will still be those 'woke/leftist' white people subverting these countries from within.
The actual diagnose - that Christianity is the threat to totalitarian control that is under attack - demands a totally different solution. It demands that we focus on following Christ, our Lord, and the virtues and values espoused by His teaching. (Re)building our societies with Christ as our King. There are no short cuts. No cheat codes. Only the long slog trying our best to be obedient (to God) and pious, teaching His word to our brothers and sisters (whatever the color of their skin), and praying to our Lord.
Warnings to men to be wary of women are as old as time (Genesis 3 comes to mind). These pearls of wisdom from our ancestors, however, aren't usually the crazy Imp talk of "all women are evil, they should all be <something>", but rather, warnings to men to not think with their dicks (something which pro-porn Imp utterly fails at - this pro-porn stance of his is completely counter-productive if he really was trying to diminish female power, so make of that what you will). That is the true lesson to men - one of the biggest inherent male weakness is their sex drive, which can either be tamed and placed on the service of reason, or be allowed to run amok and control reason, so that men do all sorts of stupid things, make all sorts of stupid decisions, all so that they can get their dicks wet.
There's a reason chastity is one of the most important virtues for Christians, a virtue is necessary for both men and women. For those of you who are Christian, you may need not to told why this is important (it is what God desires from us). For those of you who aren't Christian, chastity is essential to building stable societies. It's should be obvious by now that allowing sexual perversion to run loose in society corrupts all of society. But sexual perversion can only be fought at its roots - by placing the sex drive under the strong control of reason and limiting sexual expression to the need to produce children between in a stable marriage.
Want to fight pedophiles? Make sure you are chaste.
Want to fight trannies? Make sure you are chaste.
Want to fight feminists? Make sure you are chaste.
Want to fight abortion? Make sure you are chaste.
Want to fight evil? Make sure you are chaste.
Don't be fooled by the feminist "anti-sexualization" propaganda. In reality, women and feminists know that most female power comes from female sexuality. Men being constantly exposed to media containing "attractive" women is a sure route to men becoming simps who worship pussy, which leads straight to feminists being in charge.
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas to you all! May His love bring you peace today and always. Christ is King.
Indeed. Merry Christmas, brother and God bless you.
I guess I meant an average teenage boy would be quick to brag.
Fair enough, but I'm sure you can see that this is a symptom of the corruption of the modern world, where male success is now defined by many based on how much pussy he is able to bag. Historically, in a moral society, a teenage boy fornicating would not be bragging about his sin, for it is not something to brag about.
I am Christian too, and so I am appealing to you to stop perpetuating sinfulness of the world by treating it as "normal". It is only normal for sinners. It should not be normal for those of us who are seeking to follow our Lord and his moral law.
And if I was 14 or 15 and a hot teacher was having sex with me it would be very hard for me not to brag
That's because our society is corrupt. In Christians societies, i.e. those in the west historically, fornication was sin not a virtue.
Anyway, what's there to brag about, oh a woman let you stick her dick in her vagina? You must be special, you have been chosen by a woman! So women are your god? No wonder feminists are in charge. Stop putting pussy on a pedestal.
The real God, the one you will be answering at the end of this life, will be just shaking his head.
Sure. It's not "hilarious" though, is it? It's simply being agreeable and telling you what you want to hear. Completely predictable for anyone who has ever tried "conversing" with one of these algorithms.