I've been thinking about race, politics, family and all the crap that's been going on.
And one of the things I've realized about the elites, is that they hate poor whites and middle class whites more than anyone else, and I think the reason for hating whites makes sense when you think about it.
White people everywhere, wherever they are, generally think about freedom and push for freedom everywhere. That is a problem for them. They are only going to replace and remove whites from power in their countries because they can't control them, the goal is to put trojan horses in power that are also white or look white, and only replace them completely afterwards (this is where we are right now, notice how the whites in power is always a Marxist, it is never just about their own country and people).
We are actually seeing how all these Marxist supporters of Palestine are being pushed aside by the authorities (we know the don't give a shit about "minorities" at all), they immediately lost political influence and out of nowhere the "right wing" media now has the narrative power because they decided it is necessary, but when we are no longer useful to protect them, they are going to go back to whatever they want and kick us again, all of us, right and left alike.
They used leftists all this time to destroy our countries and gradually put control laws over our lives, when people went after them in 2011 with the whole Wall Street situation, they used leftist ideology to divide us, now that they are being attacked again, they are using the right to move the rage towards Muslims. (Who deserve it no doubt, but let's talk about who is really in control here).
So all this time, we have been being used by the elites and because the internet exists, they can no longer hide (that's why they want to control all social media as they did with the mass media), I think the "change" of narrative we are seeing that benefits the "right" is nothing more than another operation to protect themselves.
And here is the craziest thing I think is happening ... we are allowed to talk about protecting white countries and white people, because they are actually thinking of using white people as their strike force if shit goes down in flames ... white supremacist armed forces funded by Marxist globalists are on the table, because if necessary, they will not only have stronger white men killed in battle, but they will also imprison the survivors who win said race war through a new type of Nuremberg trials (the strongest will be dead, and the rest will be politically assassinated).
They thought they could control the browns and blacks because they really think they are racially superior (the white elite who are under Zionist influence, and the Zionist Jews themselves), but seeing how no one is publicly defending them, they have panicked and are thinking of using whites to defend them. And furthermore, the other reason why they were bringing Africans and Asians, among other Muslims to America and the West, is because black Americans and Hispanics are coming into ideological contact with whites and they can't let that happen.
But as I said before... now that the machine is running and the bureaucracy is too big to handle it, they can't stop the whole operation (mass indoctrination has that problem, that the machine doesn't stop running even if you try to stop it, because the useful idiots will continue to operate against your orders, they now believe the lies and that's why they are Marxists), so they are planning ahead. ... and as I said, the white supremacist groups are going to be controlled by the CIA and the feds, and they are going to be used as pawns, shock troops, or exterminators if necessary.
Crazy fucking long post but, i'm i seeing too much into this whole situation?.
There is something to this but you are making the mistake of "correlation being causation". Yes, (some) white people are a barrier to totalitarian control of the world. Yes, this is (partly) due to the difficulty in controlling these people.
But this is only correlated with them being white. It is not caused by them being white. There is nothing inherent with white people, due to their genetic ancestry, that makes them resist totalitarian control. After all, plenty of totalitarian regimes have been white. Plenty of those currently pushing for totalitarian control (e.g. those you call "leftists") are white.
The focus on white people in terms of their skin color and DNA is a psyop. The point is to keep you distracted so you cannot diagnose what is actually going on. The point is to take advantage of the primitive heuristic within people to assume people that 'look like them' are on their side. Like all heuristics, like all instincts from our primitive lizard brains, this heuristic is useful for making snap judgements, when time is of the essence and response is needed immediately, but poor when making the best judgement when time is not of the essence, and we have time to think about things.
So what is the underlying cause then, if not skin color or genetics? It is the beliefs inherent in the culture of white people. It is the beliefs that have been honed and developed over centuries and passed on from generation to generation, sometimes progressing further, sometimes regressing, as each generation makes its mark. The core of these beliefs, however, is not a random vacuum. The core of these beliefs is European Christianity. It is the values and virtues from Christianity that is the basis of Western and European civilisation and success. It is the values and virtues from Christianity that are most under the attack. Those after totalitarian control are more interested that no one has these values and virtues than the color of your skin.
The misdiagnose means people cannot fight the actual problem. By focusing on skin color, people chose to help those that would harm them (e.g. 'woke' white people) and chose to harm those that would help them (e.g. Asian or African Christians). They focus on electing populist politicians, based on a misguided idea that there is some cheat code to fixing these problems (let's just elect X, he will close the borders and we'll all be saved!), when there is no cheat code - even if the European countries were 100% white, there will still be those 'woke/leftist' white people subverting these countries from within.
The actual diagnose - that Christianity is the threat to totalitarian control that is under attack - demands a totally different solution. It demands that we focus on following Christ, our Lord, and the virtues and values espoused by His teaching. (Re)building our societies with Christ as our King. There are no short cuts. No cheat codes. Only the long slog trying our best to be obedient (to God) and pious, teaching His word to our brothers and sisters (whatever the color of their skin), and praying to our Lord.
that's a severely long way to disprove the beginning point of your own post.
European Christianity is a White thing (possibly what the European part means...). non-White Christians, unfortunately, tragically, and regrettably prove themselves unable of the same Christian values. for example, Zimbabwe is supposedly 84% Christian - would you say the commonplace state-encouraged rape and murder of White farmers is in accordance with Christianity?
if the answer is "they are obviously false Christians" then i propose that non-Whites are immensely more likely to falsely claim to be Christian than Whites, who most often have Christian values ingrained into them even if they claim to be atheist or agnostic. you would then argue as you already have that it is Christian-developed culture that results in this, and I would then ask what culture the original Christians had to go off when primordially deciding what the next two thousand years of development would look like. then it could be claimed it was not them but our Lord Jesus Christ who decided that, but that can be easily disproven by the very many who did not follow Him, such as the pharisees who later became modern judaists, and violent political revolutionaries in our dear Europe...
eventually we have to arrive to the fact that there is something not sociopolitical about Whites that resulted in our current sociopolitics. everything has its cause, and the cause of our current everything is our DNA, just as african poverty has its cause solidified well before colonialism occurred and just as mexican cartels mimic their aztec past with their evil torturous methods despite having access to modern, civilized culture.
nonetheless, race cannot and should not be worshipped. the way forward deeply involves Christianity, we agree on this. but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility - casting your pearls before swine, if you will.
All you are doing is trying to merge the heresy of Darwinism into Christianity. This will fail. Darwinism is materialist and whereas God acts at a spiritual level. The battle is a spiritual one, as it always has been, one that the West is failing.
Equally, your argument about the success or otherwise of African countries is also largely materialist, and extremely limited.
For example:
Whether or not people from Zimbabwe are 'true' Christians is not for me or you to judge. That is up to God. Equally, following God and our Lord Christ does not guarantee you will have a successful materialistic civilisation, instead He offers the chance that each of every one of us will attain the rewards of eternal life at the end of this age.
Yes, I do believe that being Christian will societies build themselves to be healthy and healthy robust, but this is not a magic switch that gets flicked on by people being Christian (or saying they are Christian). God doesn't act like that, anyone who is Christian should know this. If it was that easy, that we could suddenly all just be baptised as Christians and then everything will be perfect, then there would be nothing for us to do. He requires us to chose, of our own free will, to have faith in Him and follow Him. To continue to struggle against Satan and his empty promises. And have faith that if we do so, we will be rewarded. If not in this life, then the next.
You are partially right, but also partially wrong. European genes have been conditioned for civilizational success in large part due to the reforms wrought by Christianity over 2000 years - the culling of immorality each generation. You get what you promote and you get less of what you reject. American and especially European society is heavily secularized, and yet still functions with more individual liberty and less abuse than other nations.
Christianity has had much less time to work its eugenic effects in the Third World, and a lot of that work has been hindered by materialistic global culture. On top of that, the children of Ham started off behind everyone else, and there is reason to believe the worst parts of the world bear the results.
However, you are correct that supplanting the spiritual causes of our current situation with an atheist evolutionary explanation is not just insufficient, but also plays into the very forces that caused the situation. One can easily argue that the rejection of God in the West is ultimately worse than the misdeeds of the Third World, since, as Uncle Ben paraphrased from the Bible, to whom much is given, much is expected. A wrong decision made with power is much worse than a wrong decision made in weakness. Complacency and spiritual laziness was the doom of the Israelites, and not much has changed.
I'd agree with this. Genetics and selection are clearly factors in the evolution of civilisations. Darwin wasn't completely wrong, but the idea that it is trivial to predict complicated evolutionary outcomes based on 5-minute thought experiments - which is what most people do when they think about evolution and 'natural selection' - is flawed (a classic example is the a "tribe with 1 man and 99 women will survive better than one with 50 men and 50 women" which falls apart even on casual analysis).
The point about Darwinism being wrong is that I meant it. Darwinism cannot be merged with Christianity. Why? Because it is a violation of the first commandment - the creation of false gods and a false idol. It leads to humans thinking it is up to them to play the role of god, and decide the outcome of evolution. That is God's role. It is not up to me or you to decide whether or not people from Africa are 'true Christians' and whether their societies and civilisation should survive or not. Yet, that is what people who are busy promoting 'whiteness' are doing - they think it is their role to decide whether Africans should be allowed to exist, based on their own human set of values. It is not up to me or you to decide whether another man, whatever the color of his skin, is worthy of salvation because he is using his reason to avoid sin. That is God's role. Yet, that is what those promoting 'whiteness' do - they decide based on some arbitrary measure of skin color that a person is 'incapable' of using reason and thus a sinner by default, and not worthy of salvation, or even existing.
My point was to make these people focus on what they should be doing - cleaning their own back yard, their own societies, their own minds, hearts and souls of sinful behavior and promoting virtue, not judging people based on how they look.
We shouldn't be trying to play God. Even if it wasn't a sin (which it is, and a particular severe one in my view), that's God's role. The Father gave us his Living Word to tell us what He wanted from us. All we have to do is follow It. For our own salvation and for the sake of the world to come.
Are there niggers in heaven?