I've been thinking about race, politics, family and all the crap that's been going on.
And one of the things I've realized about the elites, is that they hate poor whites and middle class whites more than anyone else, and I think the reason for hating whites makes sense when you think about it.
White people everywhere, wherever they are, generally think about freedom and push for freedom everywhere. That is a problem for them. They are only going to replace and remove whites from power in their countries because they can't control them, the goal is to put trojan horses in power that are also white or look white, and only replace them completely afterwards (this is where we are right now, notice how the whites in power is always a Marxist, it is never just about their own country and people).
We are actually seeing how all these Marxist supporters of Palestine are being pushed aside by the authorities (we know the don't give a shit about "minorities" at all), they immediately lost political influence and out of nowhere the "right wing" media now has the narrative power because they decided it is necessary, but when we are no longer useful to protect them, they are going to go back to whatever they want and kick us again, all of us, right and left alike.
They used leftists all this time to destroy our countries and gradually put control laws over our lives, when people went after them in 2011 with the whole Wall Street situation, they used leftist ideology to divide us, now that they are being attacked again, they are using the right to move the rage towards Muslims. (Who deserve it no doubt, but let's talk about who is really in control here).
So all this time, we have been being used by the elites and because the internet exists, they can no longer hide (that's why they want to control all social media as they did with the mass media), I think the "change" of narrative we are seeing that benefits the "right" is nothing more than another operation to protect themselves.
And here is the craziest thing I think is happening ... we are allowed to talk about protecting white countries and white people, because they are actually thinking of using white people as their strike force if shit goes down in flames ... white supremacist armed forces funded by Marxist globalists are on the table, because if necessary, they will not only have stronger white men killed in battle, but they will also imprison the survivors who win said race war through a new type of Nuremberg trials (the strongest will be dead, and the rest will be politically assassinated).
They thought they could control the browns and blacks because they really think they are racially superior (the white elite who are under Zionist influence, and the Zionist Jews themselves), but seeing how no one is publicly defending them, they have panicked and are thinking of using whites to defend them. And furthermore, the other reason why they were bringing Africans and Asians, among other Muslims to America and the West, is because black Americans and Hispanics are coming into ideological contact with whites and they can't let that happen.
But as I said before... now that the machine is running and the bureaucracy is too big to handle it, they can't stop the whole operation (mass indoctrination has that problem, that the machine doesn't stop running even if you try to stop it, because the useful idiots will continue to operate against your orders, they now believe the lies and that's why they are Marxists), so they are planning ahead. ... and as I said, the white supremacist groups are going to be controlled by the CIA and the feds, and they are going to be used as pawns, shock troops, or exterminators if necessary.
Crazy fucking long post but, i'm i seeing too much into this whole situation?.
You are partially right, but also partially wrong. European genes have been conditioned for civilizational success in large part due to the reforms wrought by Christianity over 2000 years - the culling of immorality each generation. You get what you promote and you get less of what you reject. American and especially European society is heavily secularized, and yet still functions with more individual liberty and less abuse than other nations.
Christianity has had much less time to work its eugenic effects in the Third World, and a lot of that work has been hindered by materialistic global culture. On top of that, the children of Ham started off behind everyone else, and there is reason to believe the worst parts of the world bear the results.
However, you are correct that supplanting the spiritual causes of our current situation with an atheist evolutionary explanation is not just insufficient, but also plays into the very forces that caused the situation. One can easily argue that the rejection of God in the West is ultimately worse than the misdeeds of the Third World, since, as Uncle Ben paraphrased from the Bible, to whom much is given, much is expected. A wrong decision made with power is much worse than a wrong decision made in weakness. Complacency and spiritual laziness was the doom of the Israelites, and not much has changed.
I'd agree with this. Genetics and selection are clearly factors in the evolution of civilisations. Darwin wasn't completely wrong, but the idea that it is trivial to predict complicated evolutionary outcomes based on 5-minute thought experiments - which is what most people do when they think about evolution and 'natural selection' - is flawed (a classic example is the a "tribe with 1 man and 99 women will survive better than one with 50 men and 50 women" which falls apart even on casual analysis).
The point about Darwinism being wrong is that I meant it. Darwinism cannot be merged with Christianity. Why? Because it is a violation of the first commandment - the creation of false gods and a false idol. It leads to humans thinking it is up to them to play the role of god, and decide the outcome of evolution. That is God's role. It is not up to me or you to decide whether or not people from Africa are 'true Christians' and whether their societies and civilisation should survive or not. Yet, that is what people who are busy promoting 'whiteness' are doing - they think it is their role to decide whether Africans should be allowed to exist, based on their own human set of values. It is not up to me or you to decide whether another man, whatever the color of his skin, is worthy of salvation because he is using his reason to avoid sin. That is God's role. Yet, that is what those promoting 'whiteness' do - they decide based on some arbitrary measure of skin color that a person is 'incapable' of using reason and thus a sinner by default, and not worthy of salvation, or even existing.
My point was to make these people focus on what they should be doing - cleaning their own back yard, their own societies, their own minds, hearts and souls of sinful behavior and promoting virtue, not judging people based on how they look.
We shouldn't be trying to play God. Even if it wasn't a sin (which it is, and a particular severe one in my view), that's God's role. The Father gave us his Living Word to tell us what He wanted from us. All we have to do is follow It. For our own salvation and for the sake of the world to come.
one mistake you keep making is that you think it's about skin color, when in fact these differently colored people are hated by people like me not because they are a different crayon out of the packet, but because they act evilly with such consistency that they can be equated to it. if tomorrow Europe turned into Africa it would be a tragedy not because of the loss of materialistic White beauty (it would have been God's plan for us to all become ugly, i suppose...) but because of the plethora of sins such a transformation would entail. we may have planks in our eyes but many Africans carry lumberyards around with them.
it is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't. but it is up to me, and you as well, to protect our people's goodness and salvation. allowing the defilement of all Christ stands for just for a crumb of a chance to maybe inspire one Ungbwebwe from Nigeria to become Christian would do nothing except feed personal pride - damn all these actual current-day Christians, and these people who are right at the edge of accepting Christ, i must be anti-racist and sacrifice them all to dedicate Christianity to the non-Whites, who in large part make a point of not being Christian.
with all that in mind, protection of our race from the others is, again, not worshipping race, or idolizing Darwin. it's simply protecting its goodness, and its inherent Christianity. we stand no chance of spreading any of it if we bring in rot from outside to destroy it first. Christianity is not a suicidal death cult. Jesus Christ did not die so that we, too, could die, and pointlessly to boot.
on the topic of Darwin, i don't find the idea of evolution incompatible with Christianity at all. whether God poofed us into existence, or set up this elaborate material system to create us over many years, it is equally glorious and impressive. with the Bible's penchant for not speaking literally it's likely enough in my opinion that Eve eating the apple was in fact the first human evolving just the right neurons for sapience... knowledge of good and evil, i.e. the ability to ponder good and evil. one could speculate about this forever, though.
No, I am not making such a mistake. You are attributing evil to all people who appear "African" based on the behavior of some such people. Because some African people are sinners and perform horrific acts, by default, you have decided that all (or most) African are "biologically incapable of reason". In other words, as long as your judgement of such people is not based on the individual, but the demographic group they belong to, of which they have no choice is it was simply the accident of their birth, then you in fact making the judgement based on "skin color" (or similar arbitrary measure).
You are not protecting your race from others by denying salvation to others who would be Christian if they receive His message by deciding that these for these people "reason is a biological impossibility". The early missionaries knew that their one of the main roles as Christians was to spread His message to all who would embrace it, and were happy to martyr themselves for this noble aim. The message of Christ is not yours to keep to yourself or your 'race', it is open for all people. You are certainly are not protecting 'goodness' by spreading a false gospel that only white people are capable of being true Christians, you are doing the work of Satan.
Yes it is. It could not be more obvious that your blasphemous comments. You espouse both a corrupt version of evolution and a corrupt version Christianity. For the latter, I've already elaborated why your ideas are a corruption of Christianity - you are following a false god if you make Darwinism part of your value system. Life and societies evolve, yes, but evolution is so complex it is beyond the capability of any human to predict its outcome. To a large extent, all we can do is observe the wonders of the product of evolution - this amazingly complex mechanism that God created to bring about His plan. It cannot be part of a value system. Only His word can be.
As for the former, your understanding of evolution is equally flawed, for you are insisting that based on some arbitrary measure of 'goodness' means that your 'race' is superior than another 'race'. Yet I could come up with many more arbitrary measures that show your 'race' is inferior to others - tell me, what is the birth rate of people of your 'race'? How does it compare to the birth rate of those you deem to be 'biologically incapable of reason'? Oh, I'm sure you can come up with some excuse as to why this is an unfair measure on my part, which is entirely the point - it's not up to me or you to decide what the 'correct' measure is - that is for God to decide. He will decide what 'race' lives or goes extinct. Not you. It doesn't mean there is nothing you can do if you care about your 'race', what it does mean is focusing on your own morality and salvation, not choosing to follow false gods such as Darwinism, which lead you astray.
the way you put words in my mouth and the way you would seemingly commit familial murder-suicide just to see Bungbwa open a Bible he can't understand makes me think you're not being genuine.
if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbiter, but that i simply call for common practical sense to be used when deciding how best to spread, and protect, Christianity. people following your way of thinking has resulted in situations like the fire at the Nantes Cathedral. what did that spread except flames all over Christianity?
Yeah, I agree with that. God knows the heart, not us, and there are many African Christians doing good work in Africa. But it's just as easy to observe people that belie their professed beliefs over there as it is over here.
I don't know if I've seen people advocating this. I haven't read any of the equivalent here. A lot of people promoting huwite people just want to ensure that majority white countries stay that way, which is moral and necessary.
The comment I replied to has the following line (my emphasis):
This person has decided African people are "biologically incapable of reason", so yes, there are many people who believe that non-white people are inferior to the extent they are like animals incapable of reason or being Christian.
Fair enough, it looks like he's sticking to that viewpoint. To say that describes "people who are promoting whiteness" generally, though, is wrong. It's unsettling to see radical thoughts of all stripes, but it's a natural reaction to people coming into contact with stark truth.