2
Ender910 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not even bordering on education, but instead pure indoctrination.

4
Ender910 4 points ago +4 / -0

Likely because they never use characters/visuals that actually look masculine.

2
Ender910 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely. I mean I don't entirely blame farmers for the situation. Dealing with critters intent on eating up crops wholesale is a never ending battle.

If it were more practical and economical I'd probably favor greenhouses and hydroponics as a way to limit the risk of pests without requiring any chemicals. I guess a more feasible alternative would be if people grew their own little gardens, but I imagine that would only work for so many kinds of crops.

20
Ender910 20 points ago +20 / -0

Shit like this has been going on for a LONG time. A friend of mine used to troll Monsanto-hired shills on reddit back when Glyphosate was receiving a lot of well deserved attention.

DuPont and the damage they've done is another huge example.

7
Ender910 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly. It's mind numbingly stupid how much leftists and feminism have bogged down all dialogue on the subject, misconstruing what should be simple logic.

A physically fit and healthy body, that is properly nourished with good nutrition (and sometimes with good genes) make for a more attractive and appealing mate. Not only are there valid instinctive reasons for this, but there's very much real and practical benefits as well that could help lead to a happier and more successful relationship. Better physical health, mental health, emotional health, and sexual health.

And the sexual health would be just as much due to "visual" appeals as well as due to the physical and performative advantages with being healthy and fit.

4
Ender910 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh I've become very much aware of it. I was very tempted to bring it up, but opted not to. Once people start the noticing, you almost don't even need to spell out all the examples because it becomes so apparent.

9
Ender910 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well that and the money plastic surgeons and such make from such a horrible industry.

I dare say that at most, 10% of cosmetic procedures that are undergone are even remotely justified, such as in cases of disfigurement and birth defects. Just about everything else is extra fluff that is totally unnecessary with potentially backfiring results.

On a similar but unrelated note, things are liable to get a little more nebulous though as we've already started to see the effects from video and photo filters, which are only going to become even more capable of artificial visual enhancements as the technology improves.

5
Ender910 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think Wil Wheaton is upset that he's still alive, frankly.

7
Ender910 7 points ago +7 / -0

All she really had going for her was the red hair and not being obese.

12
Ender910 12 points ago +12 / -0

He's definitely a bigger and more whiny bitch than La Boof though.

"Poor me, I was praised to undeserved celebrity status through a Star Trek and have no actual talent in acting. Pity me and worship me!"

6
Ender910 6 points ago +6 / -0

Offspring rebellion is not an uncommon variable, and while being a good parent can maybe lessen the chance of things playing out that way, it doesn't necessarily guarantee it.

1
Ender910 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still have to laugh at the audacity of that one movie he was involved with, Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death. Not a great film in the end, but the overarching themes were pretty amusing.

2
Ender910 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. He's just an entertainer who occasionally seems to give a shit about the first amendment. All while still being friends with a lot of leftards in Hollywood.

The most you can expect from him are some amusing bits, but that doesn't make him worthy of respect.

6
Ender910 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know why, but I love referring to this line.

3
Ender910 3 points ago +3 / -0

While I have heard that maybe the raw numbers might be "lower" than a decade or so ago, that doesn't mean that letting the numbers continue to be so high is remotely justified.

In other words, we're still letting in too many illegals when we have absolutely no sensibly good reason to do so, at least as it pertains to how it impacts our own fucking country. And worse still, it's deliberately being allowed by the left/Feds.

2
Ender910 2 points ago +3 / -1

That was my position as well, but with Desantis off the ticket, I'd rather gamble on Trump than risk letting a Pajeet run the white house. Although arguably, we already have a Pajeet half-running it right now. Ugh.

2
Ender910 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keffels may have been the loudmouth but it's someone else who's been actively getting companies to cut off KF's technical and financial support.

I forgot the details but iirc it's due to some tranny's father (or the actual tranny) who has a lot more power, money, and connections than Keffels. Someone who's been extremely mad about their skeletons and dirt getting exposed on KF.

Edit: I think maybe it was Liz Fong-Jones?

14
Ender910 14 points ago +14 / -0

I think the better solution is to go for the source of the problem.

These troons may usually be acting on their own, but their goals are often aided by leftist corrupted government and NGO programs and agencies. The medical industry, insurance companies, state and federal policies, the EU, the UN, etc etc.

You're not going to be able to go after tranny hives through Internet communities without potentially giving leftists and the state even more tools and power to abuse for their own agendas.

12
Ender910 12 points ago +12 / -0

I believe that was the implied point Grumman was making. Parents can and should be the ones to restrict that access, not the government.

3
Ender910 3 points ago +4 / -1

Generally no, they don't. Unless that's something that Mormons used to do many decades ago. They usually just refer to non-Mormons as non-Mormons.

Gentiles only really come up when they're maybe referring to Jews as opposed to non-Jews in biblical stories/references.

Edit: Looking it up, does seem that what you're referring to was indeed an older habit from the 1800's and maybe early 1900's. Could possibly be different in pocket groups in other countries.

6
Ender910 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't remember the full history but if I recall it was one of the big companies hit from the fallout of the great recession, which is a big part of what led to the start of media companies getting hoovered up into giant media mega corporations.

Looked it up to rejog my memory. NBCUniversal got bought up around 2010 by Comcast, which included the Sci-Fi channel.

10
Ender910 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's a Mormon thing in general, not specifically a Glenn Beck thing. Granted, I'm not sure if it's more symbolic or if they mean it in some literal sense. Might be a little of both, according to their doctrine.

11
Ender910 11 points ago +11 / -0

The decline, death, and downfall of the Sci-Fi channel.

by Lethn
1
Ender910 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something along these lines might be a good idea. Or maybe have it scale based on the standard running price for the game, since most devs already price their games based on how much content and playtime their product provides.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›