EDIT: Several weeks ago, I was upvoted quite a bit for saying the exact same thing: that I think she has potential.

When it comes to social media/forums, it's all about timing and the mood of those currently viewing. Some months ago, there was a post with a video claiming George Carlin was a proto-Redditor/online lefty. It got downvoted (as it should have, since Carlin is from a different generation and doesn't come close to the level of smug idiocy of current lefties). It got posted again a few weeks later with a ton of updoots and I wondered if I was on planet Htrae

You are right to hate them and you are right to call them right-wingers. Many of these right-wingers would reject the "right-wingers" on this group for being "degenerate" because they like video games, anime or big titties

I think it would be better to say that this issue is more rooted in what defines a "right-winger". There are other pieces to this political puzzle that need to be included when making bold claims. Lethn reaches for the false dichotomy like many others and just calls on right-wingers entirely, instead of being more specific in his claims, and that's why he gets slapped around a lot.

So if you are not a fence sitter, and you are attacking the right, then you are a leftist.

I don't automatically simp for the right therefore leftist is his position apparently.

When you proclaim that you were right about something in a condescending way and accuse supposed allies with broad strokes (instead of hitting the proper targets), it upsets the retards. It makes yourself look dumb, so I would again encourage you to stop doing it. It's no use flashing your plumage like a peacock when all it does is arouse anger in some hard-head types who can't comprehend beyond the "us vs. them" binary. Body language and intonation are missing from online discussions, and even though people have different ideas of what certain words mean, you have to understand the local context of where you're posting and be careful with word choice

Sounds like she has a lead deficiency. There's a remedy for that.

Ignoring the randomly generate names of those involved...

a passerby who has not been identified picked up Crawl’s gun... used Crawl’s gun to shoot Lewis “multiple” times... and then ran away

Only in an urban shithole would one be dumb enough to do this.

It will be interesting to see how the Fedbois attempt to interfere in this. Maybe they'll let it slide because it's an election year and they can't have BP colliding with state law enforcement for not enforcing federal laws. Or they'll just ship them or fly them in through other states that aren't Texas. But hopefully other states follow suit and deport.

Fudge packer is my go-to if I'm not feeling spicy enough to use faggot.

I wasn't entirely aware of the inner workings of each sub, but I just remember that they were part of the earliest banwaves. I assumed it was because of Reddit admins promoting body positivity and didn't know about the snarky mods. Things were extreme enough at the time that I could easily believe the ban was natural.

I feel like I'm getting old too -_-

I never posted there but I had already moved away from the site by the thirdish banwave. The bullshit included:

• Manipulating r/all because of r/the_Donald and meme magic

• Banning r/CringeAnarchy and r/fatpeoplehate for being too based.

• Banning various pro-White subs, claiming they were promoting "white supremacy" (the beautiful white women subs and the fragile black sub, which was just a mirror to r/FragileWhiteRedditor, a racist sub which still exists)

• Banning r/theredpill and leaving a notice instructing visitors to seek psychiatric help from a group that doesn't actually respect men

And this was before mods nuking entire threads on verboten subjects had become commonplace, and before r/the_Donald was taken out. The place was already too insane for me to tolerate by late 2019 and COVID combined with the opening of communities.win created an out. I explored some other reddit alts but .win was the only decent one.

Reddit will be 100% bots and astroturf eventually, don't look back.

unless you have huge trust issues and are very insecure

Considering how many male celebrity cocks have probably been through her since she first got mainstream attention 15+ years ago, and possibly the men prior given her early songwriting, her ability to pair bond is close to crippled at this point. The strip club ban and improved warobe rules make sense (as long as she's putting out, and also a guy should look presentable in public), but it's obvious she can't keep a man permanently going forward. That wall has already splatted her, and it's just her obscene wealth and popularity that's keeping the guys coming. She'll probably be like DiCaprio and continue trading for younger bods as she ages.

Two character designers so far, likely the third will be another character designer.

I don't know how I would define it now, however back around the time I was beginning to understand politics and the world, I wanted closed borders, a balanced budget with no more grift and handouts (both welfare and world policing go away), the lower taxation to go with it, and the government to leave people alone if they were being responsible and exercising their rights as per the Ninth Amendment. People being allowed to prosper without unnecessary government interference and without appropriating their fruits to subsidize those who don't want to contribute. Currently I'm cynical about whether or not Americans are competent enough to accomplish that.

But it's certainly intensified... to the modern vitriol

Again, it's because of the polarization. The specific vitriol is really stemming from the consolidation of "tribes" on either side. As things become more strained, there's less room for disagreement about the solutions.

Getting high is a "basic right"? Where did you get that ridiculous idea?

You spoke of drug use in the same post as "fundamental liberal premise that people are 'equal'". I assumed you were meaning that universal equality and recreational drug use are concepts that should be treated the same.

your reward is in heaven with Him and not on this earth

Material wealth is temporal and vain, sure, but I believe that accepting fate and hinging one's purpose in life on something that has no tangible observable evidence, aside from "this world is so complex and elegant", can be a life "squandered", but... whatever helps you sleep at night. Not saying God doesn't exist, but I don't think humans truly understand exactly what they receive when life passes.

Personally, they just don't understand us tomboy enjoyers want women with minimal emotional stress and who are more likely to share our interests on a non-opportunistic empathetic level.

But more towards your point, the attack from both sides really is rooted in sex (mostly because of the progressives pushing things too far). It's rather simple:

Lefties -> We need more sexual degenerates and sterile feminists, tomboys are troons

Righties -> We need women to be strictly feminine, not enforcing gender roles has infected everyone with teh ghey

Your "drug" example, although absolutely silly, makes sense for voting but not for basic rights. You do understand that if rights are ordained exclusively by taxes combined by land ownership, all the upper echelon have to do is bribe government to regulate self-sustaining business out of existence and buy out all the land? Civil unrest begins and civilization goes bye-bye and you start all over again.

Equality before the law regardless of socio-economic status at least creates some political and societal stability. Why participate in society if you aren't wealthy enough to own land because the value has been inflated to where 80% of society can't afford it? In many states or town jurisdictions you don't even own the land anyway, because your town is in possession of the title deed to legally siphon property taxes.

how the former became the household definition

Because there were so many claiming to be "libertarian" that either were instead liberals or became authoritarian leftists as they got older. They weren't actually for small government and freedom, they desired some non-existent freedoms and also to tear down some things as they just didn't like what either major Party was doing. The term was fine over a decade ago, but the rise of SJW-ism during Obama and its metastasizing in reaction to Trump, caused the term to morph. It's tainted to the point that you can't really claim to be one without garnering a negative reaction, similar to how words like Nazi and racist were used to denigrate people until those words lost their power.

And really the West is so polarized now, you're not going to be able to go outside the dichotomy without one of the major factions accusing you of being the other, even when some sheep among both of them have similarities, in that they are anti-freedom and autonomy. A declining society/civilization will feature this behavior as humans regress to their tribal instincts. The current state of the mass populace is not really any different to WWII, when all the major belligerents were practicing some form of Socialism yet we're supposed to pretend one alliance wasn't evil. Historically, intelligent people always suffer from this cycle.

My opinion I made above won't make sense to, or be agreed upon by, everyone because I'm someone who was born on the edge between generations. Our kind get screwed out of opportunities by both ends (like my parents did), so my outlook on the concept of "generational gaps" is negative.

It probably defeats the point of my argument but I don't like the defined ranges for each "generation". There's similarities among those in the ranges but it's not representative of every single person in that hard line range. It's only really become a part anthropology because the Industrial Revolution caused rapid changes in technology that affected culture to the point that people 20 years later aren't psychologically the same as those before them. Prior, things evolved so slowly you could have three or four generations of people be pretty much the same.

Instead they collectively bought in the lies of good times and muh equal, and chose to become lotus eaters

Good times make weak men

greatest flaw of the millennial generation is their appalling lack of perspective

Flaws of the average person from any generation are a consequence of what came before them, simply because of their upbringing being different whether it be politics or technology or rearing from parents.

• Greatest generation dropped the ball by resetting geopolitics
• Silent Gen can't/couldn't let go of the past or former glories
• Boomers are spoiled narcissists that benefitted from Western economies getting hallowed out yet acting like the youngins are the issue.
• Gen X'ers became jaded and probably doomer-pilled to the point they couldn't help move the needle back
• Millennials are intolerant extremists thanks to all the agitprop bombardment in media and Internet
• Post-Millenials/Zoomers are degenerate narcissists seeped in anti-humor memes
• Post-Zoomies can't (won't be able to) think past their iPads

A handful of the characters are serviceable, but with a granny rapper, male characters designed to confuse people (Geeta, Grusha and Rika), a toddler-sized Elite Four member claiming to be 9, various hairstyles and appearances that put the craziness of SwSh to shame (especially the Team Star Squad bosses), it's a whole lot of NOPE.The series is probably fully compromised at this point.

Aha, that gave me a good laugh!

Considering the lack of needing to strongly develop characters, it's a fast and easier way to cultivate manga drawing skills.

With that, I still don't see how it's manslaughter on part of the father simply because it wasn't done by his own hands. If they knowingly let their son have a gun, at most it should be accessory to murder, but I'm assuming the prosecutors were slapping harder charges because the shooter was a juvenile and they possibly don't like guns.

The irony of him saying to "spend it on anime porn" is you could walk not even a few feet into Pixiv and easily find PokéPorn for every fetish under the sun. It's so grossly abundant.

If legal challenges can only be done in the DC Circuit then the law should only havd jurisdiction in DC. All other states can ignore said law because challenges can't be conducted there.

(DC needs to be dissolved. The capital should not be its own metaphorically walled city-state for the corrupt rats to consolidate power and hide)