22
ClownTamer 22 points ago +22 / -0

It’d be the funniest bail out yet. That probably means they’d get it.

“We keep making movies about how we hate the majority of people. And the majority of people won’t go see them! So we need the majority of people to save us so we can continue pissing off or annoying the majority of people.”

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d say it’s more that we’ve let a grim caricature of female nature take over in an effort to not be mean, and we need a return to masculinity as far as leadership and values go. Right now we’re being run by hysterical female values to appeal to hysterical female women because they’re one of the biggest voting demos you can swing.

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard it was good from many people with good taste. Honestly I don’t care what people say about it, I’ll get it at some point after I finish Tears of the Kingdom. I’m fine if people boycott CoD since it sucks anyway.

14
ClownTamer 14 points ago +15 / -1

A lot of them say they hate men. Then they pretend to become a man. Then they get hated and hate that too. Pretty soon the backlash will grow hating the male doctors that made women men.

8
ClownTamer 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can’t tell at this point.

8
ClownTamer 8 points ago +8 / -0

If there’s no race, then we were all enslaved and there’s no need for reparations or priority college admission.

7
ClownTamer 7 points ago +7 / -0

Now it’s about degrees of gayness

7
ClownTamer 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’ll be wonderful if it works out.

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

My limited understanding is they wrote some of their usual bullshit but aimed it at Nintendo for not being diverse or woke enough or something in some of their reviews of Nintendo games, so rather than artificially souring the market based on that leading up to a game’s launch, Nintendo has been flipping them the bird ever since with sending them anything, prerelease or otherwise.

Kotaku would have just said that it’s still a regressive game for not making Zelda the lead or Link black or something. And that the only person of color in the whole game is usually the villain.

11
ClownTamer 11 points ago +11 / -0

It is kind of hilarious how people try supporting transing the kids as supported by ‘Science’. Like with puberty blockers. They haven’t even been using that for transing people for more than a decade or two. If that. We basically just made it up by using one med to do something else, and even those meds haven’t been around for more than a blip. Or people saying ‘Science™ says most trans kids are happier after transitioning’. We literally just made all this shit up.

Or saying there are no long term side effects from the Covid shots. We just made that shit up at point of injection. We had no idea.

by folx
2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suppose part of the problem is that even in your response, you’re using ‘gender’ in the sense they use it instead of saying their ‘sex’. Gender used to just refer to the implied or analogous ‘sex’ of things that don’t have it, like words in languages like Spanish. It was just used at times as a synonym for sex outside of that. Now, it’s been completely corrupted.

by folx
6
ClownTamer 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you subscribe to their world view, this guy is ‘funny’ in that sense. If you believed all that nonsense, the structure of what this guy’s saying is comedy. The bigger issue is that some people actually believe that world view, despite all evidence to the contrary.

It is funny, to certain people. The issue is more that those people exist than the comedy. Kind of like when people around here make fun of wokies. If you don’t believe in that stuff, making fun of it is funny. If you do believe in it, the jokes don’t sound true and it stops being funny.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha, I don’t know about that. I think it’s more that you had bad people with bad ideas given to bad writers on a bad show for all the wrong reasons.

9
ClownTamer 9 points ago +9 / -0

At this point everything’s the right place for it. I mean they turned late night TV into Pfizer ads anyway. They even got Colbert fucking dancing with needles.

5
ClownTamer 5 points ago +5 / -0

You know women are easily persuaded when the establishment got them to actively fight for the right to do shitty jobs they hate for years on end until they no longer are capable of having kids and nobody wants to make them with them.

3
ClownTamer 3 points ago +3 / -0

A competent owner would have an easy time of things too. There are hundreds of Star Wars books that are better than all the new films and shows of it. Even the games had better stories. George could just buy it back and then just hire anybody at all to turn the books or comics into movies.

19
ClownTamer 19 points ago +19 / -0

Girls like that aren’t good wives anyway. Or people. Imagine throwing out a 25 year marriage because your husband had a different opinion on an abstract issue that doesn’t directly affect either of you.

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s even more compelling that Crowder became monetarily unworkable due to all the bans when his own network could no longer support him. It’s not like The Blaze is retarded. If they could make it work they would have since he was already on there and was for years.

Crowder’s whole shtick here seems to rely on people not realizing how contract negotiations work, so he could try to have a big ideological movement to support him launching his own thing when the reality of it was that the guy that gets banned a lot and is demonetized isn’t profitable without his own private network like Jones. I’ll support him either way, but could have done without all this.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Making rational decisions on social dynamics is something that Estrogen seems designed not to allow.

6
ClownTamer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Most people in general are bad at their jobs. Especially if their performance doesn’t affect them having the job. Most women are bad at their jobs at a higher rate than men because they don’t have to be good at things for their life to work out. Based on that, most women will be worse at all work than most men in most contexts. Not all. But most.

That’s not because women are dumb or anything, either. They just don’t have much reason to work more or try harder in most cases, because they are women. Guys have the opposite incentive structure, because they have to work harder and excel more if they want any chance of getting laid. In that context, it would be very strange if women weren’t worse than men at most jobs, who themselves are also typically bad at their jobs because most people are bad at their jobs.

Competent female employees also typically feel that way and don’t like working with other girls because most expect the same social considerations made in the social/dating world to still apply in the work place, only now without having to give anything in return. I know plenty of women that are good at their jobs, and if they had their way, they would hire not one other women in the entire company.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›