They basically won. They are still writing, and all the games are shit. Only a few of those outlets went under.
They ARE the Bilderbergs. There is something like 80% overlap between them. Just look at the list of attendees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Bilderberg_Conference
Inb4 someone screeching about archives.
It's something DoM could have wrote.
Don't be a fucking retard.
The bullies have members of the groups of "criminals, jocks and niggers".
You're just looking for an excuse because I mentioned jews.
Not that strange. Super Monday Night Combat did it more than a decade ago, and it was pretty fun. It just lacked any sort of SBMM so it died due to pubstomping and UberEnt being uber pieces of shit. They used the funding from SMNC to make Planetary Annihilation, which also failed.
The people that were at UberEnt are people to watch, and stay away from. The fucked up KSP2 as well.
Man, if only there was a way that you could transmit a picture of what you see on your screen, a screenphoto or something. That would make figuring out what the hell is going on so much faster.
You are a democrat.
You are repeating Democrat talking points again.
I'm literally holding an opinion piece (written by a local jewish democrat party proxy) from a newspaper that says
Brad Onishi, former evangelical minister who once identified as a Christian Nationalist, described it as, "an ideology that is based around the idea that this is a Christian nation, that this was founded as a Christian nation, and, therefore, it should be a Christian nation today, and should be so in the future."
...the 2024 elections will determine whether we save our Democratic Republic, Constitution, and democratic ideals created by the Founders of our county, or lose it all and plunge into authoritarianism and theocracy.
You are literally on the side of the NAACP, Unitarian Universalists, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
No rights for non-whites.
Time to bring back privateering. A few Letters of Marque would go a long ways.
Between her claiming this is the first time she's heard of the Zoepost and her claiming that r/wallstreetbets blew the lid off of "Gamergate", it's pretty clear that she believes the GameStop short squeeze was Gamergate.
Newfags gonna newfag.
Wait a minute...
r/wallstreetbets
You think that the Gamestop short sell was gamergate? You think one game-whatsit is the same as any other game-whatsit?
You owe everyone in this thread an apology. Not that you will. You will just double down and darvo, like the cunt you are.
You do not belong here. Leave.
Gamergate was the side that opposed the journalist, you fucking mongolid. Gamergate was the side that opposed the people that were saying "Gamers don't have to be your audience anymore".
You are supporting the side of censorship while claiming that it is the side of shit talk.
There is no way even a woman is that retarded.
You don't belong here because you don't even know the basic history of Gamergate.
Woman moment. You don't even know which side was which.
Newton wrote down the law of gravitation in 1687. People weren't floating off into space before then. The same thing applies to the NAP. Just because it was called something different doesn't mean it was actually something different.
Look at the history of casus belli. Cato the Elder wanted war against Carthage because they were becoming a threat and should be destroyed while they were weak. The Mongol Khanate wanted war because they were stronger and thus it was their right. Both of those are very much a might makes right casus belli. The Peace of Westphalia brought about the NAP between nations even though it was not called that back then. In fact the entire concept of jus ad bellum is just a variation of the NAP.
, because the NAP is not the only moral system in which committing certain offenses against someone is seen as wrong.
Could you provide an example? I cannot think of any that aren't just the NAP with a thin veneer over it.
Authoritarian don't need the NAP to justify their actions, whereas Libertarians (at least a few years ago) were always harping on the NAP. It's just that the NAP is the foundation of victimhood culture, and people just don't seem to get that.
Think about how claims of anti-semitism would work under a "might makes right" system: The universal answer would be "so what?"
This is the correct stance.
Anyone who is talking about moving is doing exactly what the elites want. They want a rootless class of lower managers to ship around the globe to where ever the next country they are looting is. They want people that have no ties to the land, no history, and no culture. And most importantly they want white blood to be diluted into nothingness so that whites may never oppose them again.
It's just an extension of the Non Aggression Principle. Under the NAP the first person to claim injury is the moral actor, therefore the winning strategy is to claim injury early and often. Libertarianism is just a subset of Leftism.
Fortunately, no one has to care about christfags like you. You aren't permitted to kill your enemies. Or are you more willing to kill whites than blacks?
They rebranded DIE with BRIDGE, and you call that a victory. We have to import our games from China, replacing one source of communist propaganda with another, and you call that a victory. They are funding outlets with unlimited funny money, while inflating your currency to nothing, and you call that a victory
It's only a victory for those that hate white straight males.