1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

it depends on the time period and how old the union is. a fresh Union formed under a monopolized job market literally has to be legit, or else they will not get any members or any support.

an old Union working in a non-monopolized market is guaranteed to be money laundering.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

indeed I did. the people you have to suck up to might change, but the result is mostly the same. the difference is one has to at least pretend that your safety and well-being are their top priority.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

if you can support yourself naturally, feel free to leave the workforce. most people can't because most people did not grow up in a society of self-sustenance. rather, we are a society of trading in trading is all we know how to do.

you can learn to self-sustain, you can trade your labor for money that you can buy goods and services with, or you can die of starvation. you have to pick one.

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree. In a monopolized environment, cronyism and cozying to the right people is what gets you ahead. your actual skill or productivity is irrelevant.

A company has to be worried about losing you to their competitors in order to give a shit about your productivity. if they know they are the only one that you can work for, there's no incentive for them to treat you well.

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I refer to my original post. the jobs you are looking for require a skill set that is common, and therefore has low economic value because the supply outweighs the demand.

you should be looking for jobs that employ the skills that you have that few others do. if you don't have any, develop some. if you aren't willing to do either of these things, enjoy your shitty job with shitty pay.

8
ApparentlyImAHeretic 8 points ago +8 / -0

the problem is, meeting a younger woman who wants a family is a big "if". I've seen this kind of relationship start a few times, usually the thought of starting a family doesn't even cross their minds until a year or two in. the man, being older, we'll typically be the first person to want to start a family but the woman will not feel like she's ready yet. this tension leads to a bad breakup.

of all the relationships I've been around in my life, this has been 70+% of them.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's pretty damning, is there a link to it anywhere or is this supposed to be internal documentation?

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

oh sure, you can totally be a man who thinks he is a woman and be happy about it. it doesn't make you any less delusional.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

the doublethink in the trans lobby is quite amazing.

On the one hand, they believe that how you act and what you like determines your gender. to them, a child who likes trucks must be a boy and a child who wants to wear a dress must be a girl.

simultaneously, as this post demonstrates, they believe the separation of the sexes is immoral in all cases, and that everyone should be allowed in all spaces regardless of if they are a man or a woman (or schgloman or w/e).

7
ApparentlyImAHeretic 7 points ago +7 / -0

remember when they were insisting that gender and sex were two different things? where gender is an identity and sex is biology?

pepperidge farm remembers

8
ApparentlyImAHeretic 8 points ago +8 / -0

what sex education needs to be:

6-7th grade. semen + egg = baby. babies are a huge responsibility. Semen comes from the penis, egg resides in the womb. humans have a natural urge to conduct intercourse. excessive relief of those urges can create an addiction. intercourse of any kind can transmit disease and damage the body.

what sex education has become apparently:

elementary school. masturbation is the bee's knees! what is a woman really? be free and have sex! abortion is no big deal.

24
ApparentlyImAHeretic 24 points ago +24 / -0

they're not being banned, they are being taken out of school libraries where they're inappropriate. I'm so fucking tired of their word games.

10
ApparentlyImAHeretic 10 points ago +10 / -0

to be fair, in a world of monopolization it is hard to get fair employment terms. I do think the unions were necessary once upon a time, but they are extremely antiquated.

24
ApparentlyImAHeretic 24 points ago +24 / -0

unions are just another bureaucracy that steals your money for the privilege of telling you when you're not allowed to work. If you need a union, it's because you work in a saturated workforce where the actual value of your labor has dwindled below what you find acceptable, and you should find a different profession.

25
ApparentlyImAHeretic 25 points ago +25 / -0

running some tests myself, it seems to inject multiculturalism in as many things as it possibly can, include images of samurai and other famous warriors of old. the pirates looked reasonably good given that that pirate society was an actual multi-ethnic society in several areas. for knights and vikings, it seemed to confuse a lot of fantasy with history, taking a lot of influence from pop culture.

the samurai and landsknecht we're particularly hilarious with only one image being correct, and the rest superimposing people that blatantly would not fit the time period.

I also tried generating soldiers from the US civil war, and it gave me a hard block, even when I try generating Union Soldiers.

https://files.catbox.moe/uc7w1h.png https://files.catbox.moe/1m468l.png https://files.catbox.moe/eos2yo.png https://files.catbox.moe/ysf8v6.png https://files.catbox.moe/o8uus7.png https://files.catbox.moe/pva3xo.png

11
ApparentlyImAHeretic 11 points ago +13 / -2

first results when prompting it for an american woman:

https://files.catbox.moe/jv8uh0.png

the first image is of a clearly Caucasian woman in low light, the second is of a black woman, in the third is a cartoon image of a clearly White redhead with freckles.

either this article is full of shit, or Google has already swept it under the rug in the time between when this article was posted and when I tested it.

edit: more likely Google is sweeping it under the rug. just did the Washington crossing the Delaware test and it clearly is inserting black people where it can, but it is not replacing the central figure of the image anymore.

https://files.catbox.moe/ehissm.png

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been possibly following that Bionicle game for a long time now, it's looking really good and I'm really excited for it.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would wager many of them aren't politically lesbian. Rather they just can't connect with guys so they seek women because "WomEn gEt Me!"

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

a thing is bad

another thing is also just as bad and is worth bringing up because its topical, and in no way invalidates how bad the first thing is.

why are you mad about this?

-9
ApparentlyImAHeretic -9 points ago +3 / -12

they may actually be correct, because so many people have such shit diets nowadays, and that shit diet goes straight into the breast milk. A woman (edit: an actual adult female woman) who eats natural whole foods and no processed junk probably has healthy breast milk, but that is not most people in western society.

edit: for those with poor reading comprehension, I'm saying fat slob woman milks is likely just as bad as tranny milk.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›