In my limited experience, lefties lack the introspection necessary to learn from their defeats rather than merely obsess over them.
I suspect it's because a lot of lefties are, honestly, scared of examining anything, but especially themselves, to that level of detail.
That's not a surprise, unfortunately. Even if the had kid survived, I'd be amazed if they didn't experience significant degradation.
And, the important point, that is the point of this.
Repeated heavy blows to the head will kill or cripple, especially, as here, when the kid's skull is against the floor and cannot rock with the impact.
Every time you see this, it's attempted murder.
Even with the (supposed) main head of the cult removed from power a few years ago, these things won't just go away.
Eh, modern feminism is an iteration of marxism. They will sacrifice everything to retain power, including their precious "representation".
I suspect it depends on what the purpose of those weapons is:
Consider, for instance, some kind of high-orbit defence platform with regular resupply. That can afford relatively wasteful practices, although, even there, throwing heatsinks overboard and FOD'ing it's own orbital track seems unwise.
Perhaps they'd settle for a simpler option of using a water heatsink and just spraying the stuff overboard - or the sublimation system the Apollo spacesuits used.
Conversely, some kind of spaceship operating far from support might not want to dump it's water overboard every time it engages targets, so might prefer to maintain a stock of dedicated heatsinks or just run very large radiators to dump the heat without requiring any consumables at all.
Yeah, the issue for spacecraft generally isn't that they cannot keep warm.
It's that they cannot dump the heat they are already generating.
For instance, look at the picture. Note the huge radiator arrays? Those had to be lifted in to orbit at horrendous cost. That wasn't done by accident - this is not a facility struggling to stay warm, far, far from it.
It's part of the trade feminists make.
To allow them to completely remove the possibility of agency from women, rendering them basically cattle - and this is how feminists think of women, not me, although feminists, of course, play word games to avoid confronting this - they must then ascribe the most malicious, spiteful motivations possible to men to account for feminism's many failures.
Yup, a retired F-14 pilot did a video on it a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFUXshaaMQM
I wonder if the British civil service is so in favour of this on the theory that if they can import enough people from outside, they can run the government without having to worry about those pesky voters getting in the way all the time...
... leave it to historians to find it "most probative" that they alone can see law that was not written.