3
A2BS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Speaking of PS5 tranny shit, Bugsnax is a pretty based metaphor for trannies if you think about it. People find out about an island filled with food-like creatures that everyone says is cutesy and delicious, but the end shows that they’re actually parasites that mutilate you and force you to make more of them. The survivors go back to society to warn others of the truth but the media blacklists them after being ordered to by an unseen cabal.

3
A2BS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. They complained about not being able to move, get married, have a business, meet in public, and speak out.

by HypJii
1
A2BS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice try, roastie. You couldn't fuck your way out of a brown bag, much less run an underground prostitution ring in the Bible Belt.

1
A2BS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll make sure to say the same thing to the other students in my high-level math classes in college speaking Chinese.

8
A2BS 8 points ago +8 / -0

His behavior seems oddly... robotic, even? if favorable=false, print "Russian Bot"

2
A2BS 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s not a human rights violation if you strip them of their humanity through propaganda.

1
A2BS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder, does the “9 times” statistic take into account that certain perpetrators (rapists, child molesters, and pedophiles) are abused at disproportionate rates?

3
A2BS 3 points ago +3 / -0

If your partner did that, they’d be considered a psychopathic abuser.

2
A2BS 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with this mostly. Specifically his mom was very abusive and pampering. Bad parenting, hoarding, and poor financial decisions weighed down the family and practically forced the dad into an early grave. Chris is clearly someone who believes nearly anything that’s told to him (as long as it takes almost no effort to believe, since many people have failed to even con him into getting a job or a hygienic routine) which is partially a side effect of his autism but his stubbornness, inability to learn, refusal to become a better person, and hypocrisy seem to be direct results of his mother’s shoddy personality from before she became a vegetable.

2
A2BS 2 points ago +2 / -0

From just a normal, rational, apolitical standpoint, you should never feel bad for be forced to feel bad for being hesitant to take off clothes in front of other people. Now stepping into the political spectrum where this is agreeable with anyone who isn’t hyper-authoritarian, it’s presumptuous to assume that Arabic has gone through the same language transition they’ve forced where men/women refers to expression over sex and have thus adapted their religion to this modern Western minority, because the Quran was written over 2000 years ago. There’s just no understanding of faith or religion by these people.

1
A2BS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet the article won’t stop patting readers on the back as “rationally” believing the science blindly and using psychopathic language and methods to bend others to your will. Big fan of the claim that anti-vaccine “don’t seem to respond to reason” when a few studies found that the anti-bad movement was incredibly scientifically literate. I guess that’s already being memory holed.

10
A2BS 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree with the sentiment of, for example, you just can't cut someone out of a contract just because they "aren't performing" because you told them to go out on a dangerous play and they got injured. However, shit like "I'm not gonna compete because sports make me sad" or even "I got injured getting into a fistfight with a stranger, give me money for nothing please" shouldn't fly at all.

9
A2BS 9 points ago +9 / -0

God, you’re such a media lapdog. He didn’t “threaten” to do that, he was just asked about the hurricane and rambled off possible solutions that he’d ask professionals about and the media took the worst one to spin like he decided wholly to do it. Funnily enough it would likely destroy the hurricane, just create worse catastrophes in its wake.

0
A2BS 0 points ago +1 / -1

Compulsory insemination is a worrying idea, so this definitely needs revision.

20
A2BS 20 points ago +20 / -0

Which was a COOL IDEA. It opened up a lot of thinking about what this dystopian realm represents. Was it an ironic twist that a faceless corporation creating a world of faceless beings was to be overthrown by the destruction of the self? Anyways, I guess even allowing the option of such an interesting expression was too “dark” for these retards.

5
A2BS 5 points ago +5 / -0

One big brain said “oh well on Twitter he said that they ‘killed it’ and kill is a synonym of delete and thus he claimed that they deleted it” even tho (1) it’s a Facebook fact check and (2) people often say “killed” to mean “not advertised”

26
A2BS 26 points ago +26 / -0

Not just a guy, his long time rival and the leader in the standings. From what I’ve heard he only got a penalty for pit maneuvering him and it let him win because his only competition was in the hospital.

5
A2BS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Part of the method is to get rid of the parts of the right in government who aren’t fighting, and replace them with parts who are.

1
A2BS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they’re consistent, it’s just that the first article doesn’t consider the law mentioned in the second article as a real Romeo and Juliet law as it still considers it a crime.

2
A2BS 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s good in small doses, as in a saving economy industry suffers a bit from having the capital to make products but not the demand to back it up. However we’re way past that point and I’m slightly worried about hyperinflation. Not VERY, but it’s a possibility.

4
A2BS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yay! I keep my lifestyle while my savings slowly deteriorate! Woo!

6
A2BS 6 points ago +6 / -0

Civilizations having incredible revolutions in medicine often see declines in birth rate. It may not be a causality that way but it’s an example of a declining birth rate during a time of improvement

2
A2BS 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m breaking this down one at a time. Gender Identity is complete bullshit, I melts down to saying “if the manliest man says he’s a woman, or the most feminine woman says she’s a man, you HAVE to take it at face value”. It’s nonsense from an objective standpoint, as the only way to measure it is from the person itself. Gender Expression just buys into gender roles, which is the opposite of what the feminists wanted us to do in the first place. It’s more measurable, but only if you want to engage in stereotype. Sex at birth is objectively measured and easily falsifiable, this has been widely accepted forever. Physical attraction is just sexuality, also something we’ve agreed on and know. Emotional attraction is, as far as I can tell, who you’d be friends with (that’s pretty much what a relationship without romance is) and the answer should be everyone unless you’re a sociopath or someone with a lot of specific cruel traumas.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›