I'm just going to say it, stuffing gay shit in every form of entertainment just makes me hate your movement.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
You should hate the LGBTBBQ+ mouvement. Homosexuals have equal rights, so the remaining "activists" are crybullies and degenerates who want more than freedom.
They want to coerce you into validating and celebrating their sex life. They want to censor, control and coerce speech. You will deny biological reality along with transgender activists, or else. They want access to your children for brainwashing or worse ( pedo trannies at public libraries anyone? ).
Don't let the activists use your simpathy for your gay friends or relatives who mind their own buisness. It's emotional manipulation to make you accept other things that aren't "equality" at all.
Such as brainwashing children with Gender Theory pseudoscience in schools, or pushing for an even more absurdly high over-representation of gays and trans in the media.
I grew up in a solid democrat household and was a social libertarian until a few years ago.
World War T proved the slippery slope is absolutely real and anyone who denies it is supporting the slide down.
And I'll take it one step further outside the current overton window. Homosexuality, along with any deviant (or even an excessive level of normal) sex obsession, is a mental illness and should be treated as such.
Don't ask don't tell and sodomy laws are the correct place to be, along with a separation of the public and private spheres. We pretend in public that everyone is normal. Men are expected get married to women, have a family, and raise children. Those who fail to do so are properly looked down upon. After they are married whether they dress up in women's clothes or like to suck cock on the side is something that is kept behind closed doors and dealt with in the not brought up in polite company.
Hypocrisy is the lubricant that allows the gears of society that are made up of many different and fundamentally incompatible kinds of people to function. Fuck who you want in private, pretend to be normal in public.
I don't want a new slippery slope from "if we accept that men aren't women, then we will slip back to criminalizing homosexuality".
Homosexuality is obviously a disorder of sexual attraction. Sexual attraction is there because it makes people reproduce. But there is no effective way to change sexual orientation, like there is no way to change your sex.
Your sex life is private matter though, agreed on that, and over-representation in the media in the futile hope to normalize what is not the norm needs to stop.
And your argument in favor is the same as the faggots' argument "I like it because it feels good."
I give this counter-point a 2/10.
" Men are expected get married to women, have a family, and raise children. Those who fail to do so are properly looked down upon."
I would rather be looked down upon than be a simp like you want us to be.
Me and you both.
Women showed what they are, we can't unsee it.
How about no? That's the one progressive point that's correct. A man's value is not based on whether he takes on a parasite.
It's not even so much a cynical "token" gay dude to appeal to the ... whoever likes gay dudes market any more. It's an enthusiastic "oh, we're changing the world! We're righting the wrongs of the past! We're representing poor, pathetic, 'marginalized' and oppressed people! Look at how good we are!"
I'll take the cynical marketing move over the true believers any day.
If characters were simply gay, these people would lose their minds.
They would never tolerate a 'gay' character that does literally everything normally, but has a same-sex partner that no one brings attention to, mentions, or even considers relevant in any meaningful way.
and if thry fidnt they would be crtisied. These peopld just want to be outraged ovef everything,makes tgem think they are doing something important.
Yes. They need to accept that being gay simply isn't normal. And just like how the default mode of a man without socialization/civilization is that of a brute, being gay comes with some proclivities that they need to keep control of (for men in particular it's exceptionally easy to acquire sex from other men, so they're almost all severe man whores).
Also the fictional characters aside, the real people who like this sort of thing don't realize just how utterly uninteresting all of this gay shit is. It's like how teenage girls think claiming bisexuality or whatever other vogue sexuality makes them more interesting somehow. It doesn't. But they don't care, they just want their validation from <Corporation>. It's demented.
And finally all of this has probably damaged the viability of gay characters in not-shitty media. Once we get past this, if someone wants to include a gay character in their work, as soon as it comes out that they're gay everybody who's not an intersectionalist fool is just going to roll their eyes and assume the worst.
That and also an issue is the activism and the virtue signaling. And how certain writers treat them like some kind of special protected class instead of just normal characters that happen to be queer
Watched The Walking Dead: World Beyond first episode last night.
They managed to drop in that the tough male main character is gay...because of course he is.
Yeah whats with TV shows and movies acting like for every 5 people there is one gay friend. They always need the token black guy and/or a gay guy.
I noticed many gangster shows now days have to have gay plot lines thrown in. Even my favorite series, Gomorrah, had a gang leader who was in love with a tranny. I'm currently watching the Hungarian show Easy Living , and the daughter is a lesbian. Before that I watched Gangs of London, where one of the sons was gay. Even the MMA show Kingdom had a gay plot line. I doesn't offend me, it simply bores me.
For a show called Gomorrah, this seems appropriate.
yeshnot bothering to watch this.
I droped the walking dead when they had a line up of about seven new characters all were either female, gay, black or disabled.
So you haven't met Princess?
She may be a fun character, but they need to tone down the quirkiness a little.
Zombie Apocalypse > Gay Character
Implying the group wouldnt just outright kill the man for not being a procreator? In that setting he would be a wasted mouth to feed, its as retarded as the 2 gay couples on the crew roster for a COLONY SHIP in Alien: Covenant... the fuck are THEY going to do when they get there? Waste resources?
You should have hated their movement a decade ago when they bullied and screamed their way into "equality."
Everything we complain about Antifa and similar activists was set up by the foundational work of the LGBT. They just took it further. One reason why precedent is enough reason to always resist and strike against things.
That's downplaying it.
It took the "child raping" United Nations threatening to pull funding to have them finally take NAMBLA out of their ranks in the 90s.
NAMBLA was a founding member, btw.
Its literally on NAMBLA's wikipedia page. They didn't even bother scrubbing it.
That's likely why it still exists. Anyone who knows about NAMBLA knows everything they need to from the name and learned it all before the internet. No one is looking at the page.
For those young enough to just learn about them, they aren't even going to know NAMBLA exists short of a rare rerun South Park about them. And they won't even consider that possibly is a real group.
Oh I did. I should probably get a hobby and do something else.
One day for Fathers, Mothers, Veterans. Entire month for a bunch of degenerates in furry costumes running down the streets and being vulgar,
Because that's how much attention they need to keep from tying the wrong knot and becoming Good Communists in a more-painful-than-intended fashion.
I say that, but the real goal must be to push them under 10% as a group, because they're never hitting "normal" levels of suicidal ideation.
dont deserve a dsy, to me rainbow flag us a sign of hate
I remember reading a detective story from the 90s and the main character had a partner that was gay. It was mentioned at the beginning of the story. The book was about the case they were solving not his partner’s sexuality. Nowadays every chapter would have to make mention of it.
They wouldn't be able to tolerate the idea that being gay isn't the most important aspect of a gay man's life.
As a Christian I’ve met plenty of gays who disagree with me but we agree on the “respect each other’s rights” mentality. But I think the overall push for representation is absurd. Gets to the point where sexual preference isn’t even relevant to a game or show yet there is still whining
Part of me wonders if they are trying to propagandize gays themselves into thinking that the mentality of LGBTQ2IA+ is normal, where as most gays leave that toxic community behind.
You have to wait for a preference cascade to take place against the left in order for the corporatists to turn against it. That means you'll have to wait at least 6 more months.
If we had a free market, instead of a corporatist one, this would never have been an issue in the first place.
This is a naive take.
Propaganda is not a money making endeavor.
This is world of Warcraft we’re talking about though and this desperate virtue signaling is the market speaking. Dying media loves to go woke for the free PR and they’ll double and triple down in a wokeness death spiral to try and appeal to the few fans they have left.
Roll left and die.
Y'know, I used to not give two shits about someone's sexuality. My take on it was live-and-let-live, we're all brothers and sisters on this planet, and we all just need to get along in the name of peace and harmony. I didn't give a damn if Neil and Bob railed each other up the ass nightly and twice on Sundays, or if Pete from next door liked to prance around in a dress and pantyhose in the privacy of his own living room, or if Sue and Karen have a long-time safe word with each other and wear shibari bondage ropes to work every day. What went on behind closed doors or under their clothes was their business.
Obviously, I don't think that way as much anymore. When the extreme deviants among them started dragging it out into the street and acting like it was the norm for everyone to run around in bondage gear or drag and "screw you for judging them", when they started brainwashing kids and grooming them to think that being molested was normal, when they started telling young teens that their feelings of being unsure about their sexuality was because they were really trans, when they started shoehorning in LGBTOMGWTFBBQ characters into every bit of media under the sun and fuck your opinion that the character is shallow and poorly-written because you're a bigot - that's when I lost my cool.
I know there are plenty of gay/lesbian people out there that hate the above just as much as I do. Them, I have no problem with. Them, I'm more than willing to hang out with, have a beer with, invite them over to my cookout or game night, and generally be friends with. All the rest of them, including their "allies", that think first of activism and nothing else besides that - them I have a problem with, and they can take a flying leap.
I used to basically not care about any of this shit, used to be a colour-blind live-and-let-live kind of person, but now seeing what trans ideology and critical race theory does to everything I've come to literally hate these things. Generally hate the movements and try to give the people the benefit of the doubt, but it seems that they increasingly overlap with every trans person being a mindless communist and many black people (not that I see many of them wear I live) outspoken about some mystical racism.
in my entire life only evef met one gay person, yet every pice of media has to be stuffed with em.
Personallg couldnt care less what gross activities they get up to in private, bug donf shove if front if my face.
Ive gone from not caring to outright bigtory.