Intel is pretty fucked. They have no good cpu cpu for the next few generations/years... and since intel is probably being staffed with more jeets by the day, their chances of making a competitive cpu is getting lower and lower. All the skilled and knowledgeable white and asian engineers retiring or replaced by jeets and dei.
There is no excitement for their products anymore. Only OEM buys them and they sell prebuilts to unsuspecting normies.
Their ‘tick tick’ policy died about ten years ago, and they’ve been trying to stretch the concept ever since. And didn’t an entire generation of their chips (14?) wind up completely faulty unless you manually downclocked them?
They should have retooled for ARM in 2014. They deserve what they get now.
13th and 14th gen Intel processors had manufacturing contamination resulting in oxydation.
This means your chip was physically rusting from the inside-out.
Their coding for how motherboards were calibrating voltage had several problems. The CPUs were pushed too hard to try to one-up AMD in benchmarks, resulting in premature degradation ( you could tell by the wildly higher power demands and heat of Intel chips vs AMD ). They also had weird voltage jumps that took Intel months and months to gradually fix, which also caused premature degradation.
Upgrading your motherboard's BIOS today should fix the voltage problems.
It cannot fix the oxydation problems. It will happen to all CPUs that had manufacturing contamination. There should have been a recall of all affected chips, but there wasen't for some reason.
TL;DR : Intel claims they fixed all these problems. They have lied for years about these problems existing, then about having fixed those. Fuck Intel's CPUs.
P.S. : If you have an Intel's 13th or 14th gen CPU that underperforms or has stability problems, request a replacement to Intel due to known oxydation and previous voltage-regulation caused degradation. In most jurisdictions, Intel cannot just tell you ''warranty's expired'' and refuse to replace a defective product they distributed. A CPU is not supposed to die after a few years. It's supposed to vastly outlast the computer it's in becoming obsolete 10+years later.
If they refuse, tell them you will fill a complaint to your jurisdiction's consumer protection agency and file a small-claims court claim, which Intel will lose. That should make them cave.
Side note, designing chip is perhaps the ONE computer-related thing that is absolutely insanely hard to do. Modern architecture, modern software, AI, advanced in programming language (C++ for instance) have made everything else at most a 8/10 in terms of difficulty, but most likely 4-6/10.
Designing chip is still and will always be 11/10. There is a reason only one company on earth makes the most advanced AI chip (ASML) and why only one company on earth can make the best mobile/power efficient chips (TSMC)
Intel is pretty fucked. They have no good cpu cpu for the next few generations/years
Panther Lake, Intel's current mobile option, is their best laptop CPU in years. It made a huge leap forward in efficiency, and is now the better option than AMD in nearly every metric. I think people are judging Intel on their past poor performance, no different than how people treated AMD for a while. Neither is going anywhere anytime soon.
i only do desktop ;s, cant say i owned a laptop since windows vista era.. Power use/performance is just not there for pc for gaming and it is slightly better at productivity compared to AMD.
ive used intel for a decent amount of time. 4790k, 9900k and 12900k. and 3 prebuilts before the 4790k. And I really needed a new CPU since I do a lot of physics simulations for work and constantly compiling shaders.
not that AMD is fantastic.. my current AMD computer that i built 1 year ago, contains a 9950x3d and 5090, has a lot more gremlins than all at least 3 previous intel computers combined. for your last comment.. people usually do stick with one brand for long term since its something that is familiar. it takes a lot of fuckups to make people switch. i probably will look to upgrade CPU in about 4 years and GPU in about 3-5 years and i am definitely itching to go back to an intel CPU if they do something impressive.
So let's get this right, if America and Israel, who have COMPLETE air superiority so could fly a fleet of B52s uncontested into Iran and carpet bomb, launch an bigger attack on major infrastructure because Iran won't stop harassing ships in the strait, they'll try to destroy ALL energy and water desalination facilties in the Gulf....
Ok...that would make the world more dependant on Russian and AMERICAN oil and gas especially since America is reclaiming influence in South America. I think if Iran tried, China would want to nuke Iran first...
The world being more dependent on our oil after Iranian missiles hit the big Saudi oil fields may be good for bankers and oil industry executives, but it would absolutely suck for us ordinary American taxpayers. Remember, rising oil prices will also cause groceries and everything else to skyrocket.
Remember, rising oil prices will also cause groceries and everything else to skyrocket
i can already hear the hand rubbing
this year's economy is going to be jew-maxxed to the bone, and i'm afraid the jews actually prefer it because they control the market they can also control the prices
and nothing pleases them more than goyim going into debt for putting food on their table and keeping their houses warm in the winter, now that's jewing!
We all see that prices can rise 100% in 5 days when some event happens... but even after 5 years, prices never go back down close to before the price rise.
If the market wasn't controlled by the government and monopolies home oil supply should lower prices considering the amount of untapped oil here but we all know how it'll go.
True but that'd push to have more nuclear power facilities in the US.
Ironically it'd be the countries with a functional nuclear power grid that'd survive that better, which Germany and a lot of Europe except France abandoned..
So we've reached a stage where people are unironically saying that "higher oil prices are good, actually"?
Nowhere did I say 'that's a good thing' and you missed out the following part:
I think if Iran tried, China would want to nuke Iran first...
I'm actually surprised China isn't trying to better secure 40% of it's energy imports from Saudi Arabia from Iran strikes.
As for South America it's obvious and like dominoes. Taking Maduro made Venezuela VERY complaint, cutting off oil exports to Cuba making them desperate for a deal with the US. Probably MORE desperate since you have the likes of Hasan Piker over there being a communist supporter...
That's not to mention Nicaragua shutting the fuck up ever since Maduro happened and US forces helping against cartels in Ecuador, I think the only REALLY opposing country left in South America is Brazil, everyone else is working out deals.
You said that it makes the whole world reliant on Murica and Russia. So what is your argument there exactly? It's an outcome the fatass wants so much that he's flailing about desperately trying to get the "Straights" open.
I'm actually surprised China isn't trying to better secure 40% of it's energy imports from Saudi Arabia from Iran strikes.
And what exactly did you expect?
Taking Maduro made Venezuela VERY complaint
I mean, this is just stupid. I guess you really need a "RAWR RAWR TRUMP WINNING" story, eh? You're two months in. Every other leader realizes that they have to balance against the US. And Venezuela won't be "compliant" for long, I'm guessing... like basically every other regime change of which there are dozens.
That's not to mention Nicaragua shutting the fuck up ever since Maduro happened
Er what? I'm NOT American and can see the positives and negatives of Trump.
The main positive is...he's not the other side. Like Trump may have been foolish going into this war, but the other side wants to get the third world into the west, defraud on scale then indoctrinate and even mutilate my kids. How the fuck do you reason with that!
As for South America, if Cuba already gives in to the US, Venezuela has no way to go back to what they used to do especially if they have more lucrative business deals with the US following being compliant. It's hurting China and Russian influence in the region that they are too far away to effectively help quickly enough to make a difference.
In all honesty, I see a sort of naivete towards Trump by you. For example, you seem to have legitimately thought that he wanted the Epstein Files released and that it was Pam Bondi's fault. As if that plastic blonde bimbo has any autonomy.
Sure, Trump is sort of kind of good on immigration (even without many deportations he's not letting in millions through illegal immigration), and transgenderism (belatedly, after supporting t many times), but that's not what we're talking about here, is it? There's no reason to whitewash the other crap he's pulling.
As for South America, if Cuba already gives in to the US, Venezuela has no way to go back to what they used to do especially if they have more lucrative business deals with the US following being compliant. It's hurting China
I can't believe you would put these sentences next to each other. Guess who actually has lucrative business deals with the entirety of South America?
that they are too far away to effectively help quickly enough to make a difference.
You don't need "quick" help. Even that Maduro kidnapping took months of preparation, provocation, and shooting supposed "drug boats". It's funny that so many retards got high off their own supply and thought that this is what you can do everywhere, anytime.
If Venezuela actually changes, it's because of calculations within the regime. Maybe this was their way of doing a coup. It's not Trump's non-existent genius, and everyone who cheered Venezuela is partly responsible for the Iran war.
Mostly because all evidence coming out actually VINDICATES Trump which leads to two seperate explanations for the fucked up release:
Was attempting to not implicate an 'ally' (Cough Mossad)
People within his administration lied to him on the contents they had, claiming they were manipulated to implicate him. Given how much we know he fell for hiring the wrong people during the first term, very likely.
He just made better choices with some other like Tom Homan and RFK Jr. But he's still of the older generation so is prone to not understand the full scope of the generational divide that is currently happening.
Mostly because all evidence coming out actually VINDICATES Trump
Yeah, no. It implicates him to some extent, and to a greater extent idiots in his administration like that grinning idiot who was Jeffrey Epstein's neighbor.
People within his administration lied to him on the contents they had, claiming they were manipulated to implicate him. Given how much we know he fell for hiring the wrong people during the first term, very likely.
You're very invested in that "good tsar, bad boyar" narrative. Frankly, I don't see any reason to give him the benefit of the doubt like that, not with his recent actions.
He just made better choices with some other like Tom Homan and RFK Jr.
Yeah, but those are literally the only two. I guess you could say Vance and Tulsi too, but they've disgraced themselves so much supporting wars that I've lost any confidence in them whatsoever. Vance was saying that it's not a war because "we just bombed their nuclear facilities".
I would bet my house that you've never read any history book, let alone one about World War II, because you'd know that the atomic bombs had nothing to do with firing at your gay and retarded boats.
In fact, Ukraine is firing at Russian non-gay boats and nothing is happening.
Says the obvious democrat operative who doesn't understand that the US != Russia. Why the 4 year break during Bidens term? Did they not pay you when you weren't needed?
Pearl Harbor is the event that dragged the US in the Europe kerfuffle (aka Japan touched the boats). The nukes was what that eventually resulted in
Hey, turns out that your pedo-protecting president said that Iran fired 101 missiles at your gay, retarded boats. Who knows if it's true. But it sure makes a fool out of you. Loser.
You really are a special type of stupid are you? But what do you expect from a lowly paid democrat shill. Maybe start reading that history book and find out what the nukes achieved (a certain type of surrender that is now hanging above Iran).
You've never even seen a history book in your life, let alone read any. You're too retarded for that. Go back to shilling for Epstein.
Or maybe when you said not to touch your gay, retarded boats, you meant that they're covered in human feces like your streets. You were trying to help them.
Oh, and I'm not a Democrat, or even a member of your fentanyl nation - by the grace of God.
Way I see it, they attack first (see Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, etc), that makes nearby countries ask for US interceptors and defense bases. Then they claim that their enemies are 'zionist allies' and attack civilians.
The sort of skullduggery I expect from baby-fondling jihadi cowards who fear to fight anyone but disarmed civilians.
Oh look, the durkadurka muhammadjihad came crawling back.
mention three countries that didn't ask the US for interceptors?
You know what happened to them when they didn't ask. Nearby countries took notice. By the way, Lebanon was a majority Christian country before the palestinians invaded them. And there were no american military bases in Bahrain in 1981 when the iranian government attacked them.
Are they in the Epstein Files?
They're Epstein countries. Every country or territory muslims take over, from England to the tent cities of gaza, child sexual abuse spikes. Its written into their "religion", after all. Observe:
You know what happened to them when they didn't ask. Nearby countries took notice
So you're just switching your argument 180 degrees mid-post?
They're Epstein countries. Every country or territory muslims take over, from England to the tent cities of gaza, child sexual abuse spikes. Its written into their "religion", after all. Observe:
Well, you can't have that much of a problem with it, given your shilling for Epstein and Trump.
It's a pretty weird cope when you label the IDF as muslims. Lemme guess, you gonna claim hamas doesn't have any guns next?
Dude, you're such a loser, screaming about Khamas.
So you're just switching your argument 180 degrees mid-post?
My point is, iran was attacking other countries in the region even before US military bases were built. Not a 180, but you keep seething.
Well, you can't have that much of a problem with it
You don't have a problem with your islamic leaders giving the OK to rape and mutilate infants. That's why you ignored it and tried to falsely accuse the bad orange man because he dared to fight back against your decadent cult. Typical muslim DARVO. Also, you made up the part where you said I supported Jeffry Epstein. Typical lying durkadurka.
Dude, you're such a loser, screaming about Khamas.
Says the moron whose death cult marched your precious 'hamas' into a sales event for the Military Industrial Complex.
Please destroy the Intel facilities in Israel. Please end x86 processing forever.
Intel is pretty fucked. They have no good cpu cpu for the next few generations/years... and since intel is probably being staffed with more jeets by the day, their chances of making a competitive cpu is getting lower and lower. All the skilled and knowledgeable white and asian engineers retiring or replaced by jeets and dei.
There is no excitement for their products anymore. Only OEM buys them and they sell prebuilts to unsuspecting normies.
Their ‘tick tick’ policy died about ten years ago, and they’ve been trying to stretch the concept ever since. And didn’t an entire generation of their chips (14?) wind up completely faulty unless you manually downclocked them?
They should have retooled for ARM in 2014. They deserve what they get now.
13th and 14th gen Intel processors had manufacturing contamination resulting in oxydation.
This means your chip was physically rusting from the inside-out.
Their coding for how motherboards were calibrating voltage had several problems. The CPUs were pushed too hard to try to one-up AMD in benchmarks, resulting in premature degradation ( you could tell by the wildly higher power demands and heat of Intel chips vs AMD ). They also had weird voltage jumps that took Intel months and months to gradually fix, which also caused premature degradation.
Upgrading your motherboard's BIOS today should fix the voltage problems.
It cannot fix the oxydation problems. It will happen to all CPUs that had manufacturing contamination. There should have been a recall of all affected chips, but there wasen't for some reason.
TL;DR : Intel claims they fixed all these problems. They have lied for years about these problems existing, then about having fixed those. Fuck Intel's CPUs.
P.S. : If you have an Intel's 13th or 14th gen CPU that underperforms or has stability problems, request a replacement to Intel due to known oxydation and previous voltage-regulation caused degradation. In most jurisdictions, Intel cannot just tell you ''warranty's expired'' and refuse to replace a defective product they distributed. A CPU is not supposed to die after a few years. It's supposed to vastly outlast the computer it's in becoming obsolete 10+years later.
If they refuse, tell them you will fill a complaint to your jurisdiction's consumer protection agency and file a small-claims court claim, which Intel will lose. That should make them cave.
Ah, that’s what it was. Thanks for explaining.
Shame the replacement requirement wasn’t around back when Nvidia had the problem with the 8600M.
Side note, designing chip is perhaps the ONE computer-related thing that is absolutely insanely hard to do. Modern architecture, modern software, AI, advanced in programming language (C++ for instance) have made everything else at most a 8/10 in terms of difficulty, but most likely 4-6/10.
Designing chip is still and will always be 11/10. There is a reason only one company on earth makes the most advanced AI chip (ASML) and why only one company on earth can make the best mobile/power efficient chips (TSMC)
Intel doesn't hold a candle to any of them.
Panther Lake, Intel's current mobile option, is their best laptop CPU in years. It made a huge leap forward in efficiency, and is now the better option than AMD in nearly every metric. I think people are judging Intel on their past poor performance, no different than how people treated AMD for a while. Neither is going anywhere anytime soon.
i only do desktop ;s, cant say i owned a laptop since windows vista era.. Power use/performance is just not there for pc for gaming and it is slightly better at productivity compared to AMD.
ive used intel for a decent amount of time. 4790k, 9900k and 12900k. and 3 prebuilts before the 4790k. And I really needed a new CPU since I do a lot of physics simulations for work and constantly compiling shaders.
not that AMD is fantastic.. my current AMD computer that i built 1 year ago, contains a 9950x3d and 5090, has a lot more gremlins than all at least 3 previous intel computers combined. for your last comment.. people usually do stick with one brand for long term since its something that is familiar. it takes a lot of fuckups to make people switch. i probably will look to upgrade CPU in about 4 years and GPU in about 3-5 years and i am definitely itching to go back to an intel CPU if they do something impressive.
Good.
Donald -- "The Greatest Diplomat, Possibly Ever; They Say, "Sir, You're The Best Diplomat We've Ever Seen" -- Trump
oh fuck, 200$ a barrel here we go...
Cool it with the Antisepticism
So let's get this right, if America and Israel, who have COMPLETE air superiority so could fly a fleet of B52s uncontested into Iran and carpet bomb, launch an bigger attack on major infrastructure because Iran won't stop harassing ships in the strait, they'll try to destroy ALL energy and water desalination facilties in the Gulf....
Ok...that would make the world more dependant on Russian and AMERICAN oil and gas especially since America is reclaiming influence in South America. I think if Iran tried, China would want to nuke Iran first...
The world being more dependent on our oil after Iranian missiles hit the big Saudi oil fields may be good for bankers and oil industry executives, but it would absolutely suck for us ordinary American taxpayers. Remember, rising oil prices will also cause groceries and everything else to skyrocket.
i can already hear the hand rubbing
this year's economy is going to be jew-maxxed to the bone, and i'm afraid the jews actually prefer it because they control the market they can also control the prices
and nothing pleases them more than goyim going into debt for putting food on their table and keeping their houses warm in the winter, now that's jewing!
We all see that prices can rise 100% in 5 days when some event happens... but even after 5 years, prices never go back down close to before the price rise.
If the market wasn't controlled by the government and monopolies home oil supply should lower prices considering the amount of untapped oil here but we all know how it'll go.
True but that'd push to have more nuclear power facilities in the US.
Ironically it'd be the countries with a functional nuclear power grid that'd survive that better, which Germany and a lot of Europe except France abandoned..
Guess who owns all the nuclear startups...
I don't know if any of that is true.
What I do know is that, when Iran is attacked, my price for gas goes up 50%.
So we've reached a stage where people are unironically saying that "higher oil prices are good, actually"?
Wut?
Nowhere did I say 'that's a good thing' and you missed out the following part:
I'm actually surprised China isn't trying to better secure 40% of it's energy imports from Saudi Arabia from Iran strikes.
As for South America it's obvious and like dominoes. Taking Maduro made Venezuela VERY complaint, cutting off oil exports to Cuba making them desperate for a deal with the US. Probably MORE desperate since you have the likes of Hasan Piker over there being a communist supporter...
That's not to mention Nicaragua shutting the fuck up ever since Maduro happened and US forces helping against cartels in Ecuador, I think the only REALLY opposing country left in South America is Brazil, everyone else is working out deals.
You said that it makes the whole world reliant on Murica and Russia. So what is your argument there exactly? It's an outcome the fatass wants so much that he's flailing about desperately trying to get the "Straights" open.
And what exactly did you expect?
I mean, this is just stupid. I guess you really need a "RAWR RAWR TRUMP WINNING" story, eh? You're two months in. Every other leader realizes that they have to balance against the US. And Venezuela won't be "compliant" for long, I'm guessing... like basically every other regime change of which there are dozens.
Impressive achievement. 10/10 influence.
Er what? I'm NOT American and can see the positives and negatives of Trump.
The main positive is...he's not the other side. Like Trump may have been foolish going into this war, but the other side wants to get the third world into the west, defraud on scale then indoctrinate and even mutilate my kids. How the fuck do you reason with that!
As for South America, if Cuba already gives in to the US, Venezuela has no way to go back to what they used to do especially if they have more lucrative business deals with the US following being compliant. It's hurting China and Russian influence in the region that they are too far away to effectively help quickly enough to make a difference.
In all honesty, I see a sort of naivete towards Trump by you. For example, you seem to have legitimately thought that he wanted the Epstein Files released and that it was Pam Bondi's fault. As if that plastic blonde bimbo has any autonomy.
Sure, Trump is sort of kind of good on immigration (even without many deportations he's not letting in millions through illegal immigration), and transgenderism (belatedly, after supporting t many times), but that's not what we're talking about here, is it? There's no reason to whitewash the other crap he's pulling.
I can't believe you would put these sentences next to each other. Guess who actually has lucrative business deals with the entirety of South America?
You don't need "quick" help. Even that Maduro kidnapping took months of preparation, provocation, and shooting supposed "drug boats". It's funny that so many retards got high off their own supply and thought that this is what you can do everywhere, anytime.
If Venezuela actually changes, it's because of calculations within the regime. Maybe this was their way of doing a coup. It's not Trump's non-existent genius, and everyone who cheered Venezuela is partly responsible for the Iran war.
Mostly because all evidence coming out actually VINDICATES Trump which leads to two seperate explanations for the fucked up release:
Was attempting to not implicate an 'ally' (Cough Mossad)
People within his administration lied to him on the contents they had, claiming they were manipulated to implicate him. Given how much we know he fell for hiring the wrong people during the first term, very likely.
He just made better choices with some other like Tom Homan and RFK Jr. But he's still of the older generation so is prone to not understand the full scope of the generational divide that is currently happening.
Yeah, no. It implicates him to some extent, and to a greater extent idiots in his administration like that grinning idiot who was Jeffrey Epstein's neighbor.
You're very invested in that "good tsar, bad boyar" narrative. Frankly, I don't see any reason to give him the benefit of the doubt like that, not with his recent actions.
Yeah, but those are literally the only two. I guess you could say Vance and Tulsi too, but they've disgraced themselves so much supporting wars that I've lost any confidence in them whatsoever. Vance was saying that it's not a war because "we just bombed their nuclear facilities".
How many True Promises is it so far?
"If you destroy our shit we'll destroy your shit?"
How, if your shit is already destroyed?
I don't get this.
"If you destroy our [non-military] shit we'll [use our military to] destroy your [non-military] shit?"
That's the full implication, of course that requires the military shit they do still have is capable of carrying out that threat.
Drones and missile launchers don’t require “shit”. They have their own generators
Which I assumed would already be taken out by now, or the next wave of destruction.
Do not touch the US boats. Doing so results in the sun getting dropped on you twice
Source: Imperial Japan
Source: your ass.
You might want to pick up a history book and look at the chapter surrounding the surrender of Japan
I would bet my house that you've never read any history book, let alone one about World War II, because you'd know that the atomic bombs had nothing to do with firing at your gay and retarded boats.
In fact, Ukraine is firing at Russian non-gay boats and nothing is happening.
Says the obvious democrat operative who doesn't understand that the US != Russia. Why the 4 year break during Bidens term? Did they not pay you when you weren't needed?
Pearl Harbor is the event that dragged the US in the Europe kerfuffle (aka Japan touched the boats). The nukes was what that eventually resulted in
Hey, turns out that your pedo-protecting president said that Iran fired 101 missiles at your gay, retarded boats. Who knows if it's true. But it sure makes a fool out of you. Loser.
You really are a special type of stupid are you? But what do you expect from a lowly paid democrat shill. Maybe start reading that history book and find out what the nukes achieved (a certain type of surrender that is now hanging above Iran).
You've never even seen a history book in your life, let alone read any. You're too retarded for that. Go back to shilling for Epstein.
Or maybe when you said not to touch your gay, retarded boats, you meant that they're covered in human feces like your streets. You were trying to help them.
Oh, and I'm not a Democrat, or even a member of your fentanyl nation - by the grace of God.
You're far more gay and psychotic, that's true.
What? You're a literal retard.
When Japan attacked you (fairly) unprovoked, like you did to Iran now? Retard.
Moron. I'll laugh when your gay boats sink to the bottom of the ocean.
I don’t give a fuck about what Iran, or this administration, says.
I did not know the US and Israel have water desalination infrastructure in Saudi Arabia.
Yeah. sounds odd. I think they classify any country with a US military base as part of the Zionist regime
Way I see it, they attack first (see Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, etc), that makes nearby countries ask for US interceptors and defense bases. Then they claim that their enemies are 'zionist allies' and attack civilians.
The sort of skullduggery I expect from baby-fondling jihadi cowards who fear to fight anyone but disarmed civilians.
The way you see it is to mention three countries that didn't ask the US for interceptors?
Are they in the Epstein Files?
The IDF?
Oh look, the durkadurka muhammadjihad came crawling back.
You know what happened to them when they didn't ask. Nearby countries took notice. By the way, Lebanon was a majority Christian country before the palestinians invaded them. And there were no american military bases in Bahrain in 1981 when the iranian government attacked them.
They're Epstein countries. Every country or territory muslims take over, from England to the tent cities of gaza, child sexual abuse spikes. Its written into their "religion", after all. Observe:
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/36138/did-ayatollah-ruhollah-khomeini-the-supreme-leader-of-iran-say-this-about-pedo
It's a pretty weird cope when you label the IDF as muslims. Lemme guess, you gonna claim hamas doesn't have any guns next?
So you're just switching your argument 180 degrees mid-post?
Well, you can't have that much of a problem with it, given your shilling for Epstein and Trump.
Dude, you're such a loser, screaming about Khamas.
My point is, iran was attacking other countries in the region even before US military bases were built. Not a 180, but you keep seething.
You don't have a problem with your islamic leaders giving the OK to rape and mutilate infants. That's why you ignored it and tried to falsely accuse the bad orange man because he dared to fight back against your decadent cult. Typical muslim DARVO. Also, you made up the part where you said I supported Jeffry Epstein. Typical lying durkadurka.
Says the moron whose death cult marched your precious 'hamas' into a sales event for the Military Industrial Complex.
I see, I read it again and you are correct. But your point was still retarded. At no point did Iran attack Syria, Iraq or Lebanon.
Not really. Neocons love Trump and Epstein's pedophilia. Muslims love Muhammad's pedophilia. I oppose both.
I'm impressed, you purport to be against the MIC?
So what? 100% of their military capability has already been destroyed, and Trump is aiming for 150%.
DO. IT.
Glass the entire country of Iran.
*isreal
Username checks out.