there's a reason why they never allowed people to hear what the German NatSocs themselves had to say. Because if people heard what they said , they'd realize the Germans were actually very reasonable and would probably even agree with them.
It was a pre-emptive strike. Or do you think Stalin amassed the largest standing army with the largest tank and air force in the entire world by far for shits and giggles?
Why would you aggressively and violently expand your sphere of influence and threaten the strategic supply lines of your ally while building airfields close to the border and amassing a tank and air force larger than the rest of the world combined when you have literally no plans of invading the rest of Europe?
I get you’re a pathetically retarded jeet, but your stupid ass seriously can’t comprehend the difference between invading Eastern Europe and invading Germany? Where’s the Russians operation Barbarossa you stupid jeet poolicker?
Yeah, I never denied that. The issue is that Stalin seemed genuinely to believe that he had secured a lasting peace with Germany, due to his shock at the invasion, his complete lack of response to it early on, his authorization for military parades with the Wermacht during the alliance period, and given the massive economic support that Germany had been giving the USSR.
What was Germany doing during that exact same time cupcake? Were they standing down their military? Also Russia didn’t have the largest Air Force, they also built 95% of their aircraft AFTER GERMANY INVADED. Same with the tanks, 90k out of 102k Russian tanks were PRODUCED IN THE LAST 3 YEARS OF WW2. Why are you lying through your teeth faggot?
Wait your stupid ass is now claiming Russia, who was going to attack Germany imminently got caught with their pants down by an attack on the supposed front he amassed the biggest army ever and needed to be bailed out by the US? You truly are the most pathetic jeet faggot in existence, go back to sucking on shit you degenerate retarded faggot.
Is it really so difficult for you to grasp that a surprise attack has a tendency to catch someone with their pants down? If you're not prepared for a defense it is rather difficult to defend yourself.
You've made it quite clear that you got all your knowledge of WW2 from Hollywood slop as you seem to think that the Germans were some sort of Ubermensch that started their invasion with Tigers and Panthers instead of mostly Panzer IIs and IIIs that were ill equipped for tank vs tank warfare.
How do you think France got stomped so quickly? A year after they've declared war on Germany. How do you think Rommel slapped the Brits around in Africa despite being vastly outnumbered? Because of Wunderwaffen?
Is it really so difficult for you to grasp that a surprise attack has a tendency to catch someone with their pants down? If you're not prepared for a defense it is rather difficult to defend yourself.
Yes you stupid jeet, you don’t “surprise attack” their main concentration of military, unless you’re a pathetic lying jeet faggot and the majority of the actual Russian engagement was… in Finland before Germany attacked.
No you stupid jeet, you have zero clue what you’re talking about. Preemptive strikes exist to hit someone WHERE THEY ARENT EXPECTING IT, NOT WHERE THEY SUPPOSEDLY AMASSED ALL THEIR FORCES. For example, Poland where the Russian forces weren’t concentrated at the time. You truly are a low iq jeet
The US invaded Russia in Afghanistan with the Taliban who only sprang into existence 5 years after the Russians fucked off? Shit nigger I guess I missed that.
You really should stop here and not embarrass yourself any further.
Did you not know that the taliban was formed by the mujahideen? Or do you just need semantics to frame stupid arguments like Germany “preemptively striking” russia?
So the systematic slaughter of 60% of Slavic people is reasonable? Russian people were stuck between a communist hell and Nazis promises, of course the Nazis didn’t tell them they were planning on mass slaughtering the majority of them to expand aryan lands, but you conveniently left that part out.
Oh really! So you’re now claiming operation Barbarossa wasn’t a thing? Or that it clearly planned the mass slaughter and takeover of Slavic territory? Funny how that works
insane atrocities committed by the Nazis in the Katyn Forest. All cleverly ignored by the Nazi larpers.
Like I said, you're my favorite troll!
That was the Soviet secret police, under Stalin. It was the Germans who discovered evidence of some of the Soviets' massacre of the Polish prisoners of war.
Yeah, I'm not a Nazi sympathizer like many here who joined post 2020 are, but attacking communists bent on world domination is a good thing, the first attacks were on land the Soviets had just stolen from Poland. Why you would pick that of all things to criticize...
the first attacks were on land the Soviets had just stolen from Poland
And where did Germany attack from? Was it from land they had just stolen from Poland? I’m criticizing operation Barbarossa which was a planned genocide.
Hitler's handling of WWII can be criticized. In hindsight, there likely were ways for him to win but he lost.
Ultimately, the USSR needed to be attacked and dismantled. Many Americans realized this also after WWII with Generally Patton famously writing that they attacked the wrong enemy (meaning he thought the USSR was worse than the Nazis and the USSR should have been the target). The cold war basically proves this.
Hitler realized the USSR threat and attempted to thwart it but it was a tactical/strategic error.
No? then why are nazi books banned on Amazon? Why don't history "documentaries" ever translate Hitler's speeches? why can't i post the post that OP just posted on Patriots.win or in the majority of places on the internet without getting banned or censored?
No, both Hitler and Trump had populist messaging, but it doesn't mean the 2 are the same, far from it. Racism was a core Tenet of National Socialism, anyone who was deemed "Untermensch" was fit only to be enslaved or exterminated.
I'm not seeing him say Qataris are X. I'm seeing him say one person is a Qatari. Is he saying other's are Qataris and that Qataris are inferior? Is he saying that Qataris as an ethnic group are doing something?
If someone says "I think you're JIDF" that isn't in and of itself a violation of Rule 16. Government intelligence agencies are not a racial conspiracy. Saying something is a CIA operation isn't an attack on whites.
It's not that strange. Just how we can appreciate regular old nationalists from other nations. People who have the back of their people (preferably without - unreasonably - hating others) are generally deserving of some level of respect.
No one good likes cowards and traitors, and most appreciate bravery and honor.
There are plenty of bad racists, or all races, but there are also plenty of good racists, of all races.
I don't even think there is "unreasonable" hate short of something like severe mental illness. Hate is a powerful and taxing emotion. To truly hate someone (or a group of someones) they have to either have betrayed you or threatened someone/something you genuinely love. I wouldn't hate any group that hadn't done at least one of those things, like I couldn't care less about Eskimos or Sentinel Islanders or Amazon jungle head-shrinkers or Congolese pygmies. I don't even remember they exist most of the time.
My point is, there are some black nationalists/racialists/supremacists/whatever that you can get along with. There are others that are terrible and hateful people. Same for any other similar groups of other races.
It's basically positive versus negative racialism. Do you love your own group, or hate outgroups? There are plenty of very resentful and absurd racists.
Oh nice…..well, anytime you place your race/nation at the forefront, at least in the west, there’s always a certain group of outsiders living in your midst who know you placing your needs first means they can only succeed as much as the average goyim, so yo them, that’s one of the most sinful things goyim can do, you are essentially refusing them control over your nation/economy.
Stop making shit up. National Socialist racialism was explicit that Germans were the only pure-blood decedents of Aryans, and Aryans were the founders of all nations on Earth. Jews were a subversive race that destroyed nations. Blacks were animal race. Asians were an animal race that bred with Aryans and explains how they formed civilizations. Slavs were an inferior polluted blood race that needed to be exterminated in order to preserve Aryans.
Your retarded apologetics makes no sense within National Socialist ideology. There's no such thing as 'all other races did the same for themselves'. Other races can't improve themselves within Aryanism. They are inferior and diluted blood races that physically can't improve, because civilization and nations can only descend from Aryans who are the decedents of Hyperborean. There is no rising of any other races. That's the whole reason Hitler needed to pogrom other races and ensure "breathing room" for the German race. Other, inferior, races were not able to be 'lifted up'. By his own ideology, the only thing he could do is prevent the Germans from being diluted.
Why do I have to explain Nazi ideology to you? How is it you want to worship Nazis, but you're clearly not familiar with Mien Kampf, never read Himler, don't know Nazi racial laws, and didn't read "Passing of The Great Race"?
Listen retard, all I'm asking you to do is agree with yourself.
Admit that German National Socialism wasn't just "boy howdy I think being German is cool". Just admit that it has a strict racial hierarchy, and they saw lots of races as inferior, including jews.
Just stop lying. The post is a lie. We both know it, I just want you to try being fucking honest for once.
inferior races ... That doesn't not make them lesser or disdained.
I'll grant you this: It sure as shit doesn't NOT make them lesser...
Jesus dude. Again, National Socialism doesn't give a shit about 'White' society. 'White' is a British/American racial construct. They give a shit about German society. You're race mixing your definitions here. The Franks, Italians, Anglos, the Slavs, they are all of diluted blood and are by definition inferior races. Being European doesn't make them less inferior. Read Himmler if you are confused.
You don't leave inferior races alone under National Socialist ideology. Demographics is destiny, and therefore lesser races may out-breed superior races, and it is the nature of might through history for superior races to exterminate lesser ones and take their resources for the expansion of the superior race. That is National Socialist ideology. This is not a debate. They believed this unironically, and was why lesser races should be driven to extinction: genocide was a moral imperative to ensure the survival and prosperity of a superior race. Conquest by the strong was righteous. The Nazis were not apologetic about their beliefs, I don't know why you're trying to make apologetics for them.
Maybe you don't believe that... but then why are you running interference for Nazism then?
who are you to talk about who does or doesn't give a shit about White society? you are anti White and you hated that people donated to the White woman who said nigger .
This isn't about me, it's about National Socialism. Hitler didn't give a shit about "White society", that's why he killed Slavs, bombed Brits, and tortured Franks. It's not about "Whiteness". It's about Germanness.
It is about you. You trying to talk about who is or isn't pro White is the same as a militant athiest trying to tell Christians who is or isn't pro Christian.
I'm not trying to be apologetic nor am I trying to argue from a point 75 years ago but you are because you want to be hyper fixated on your interpretations of things you haven't actually understood because your brain can't handle it because you are an inferior race.
I think if anyone can really discuss this, there are basic questions to ask;
Is the German race seperate from the Aryan race? Because he's using German a lot and not a breath about Aryans.
When was this statement made? A statement given at Nuremberg is a bit different than a statement given during the war. I guess he made them in Spain after the war when he was exiled in Spain.
Dude was ethnically French, raised in Belgium, and was a devout Catholic, why is he pro-German race?
We have to be fair. I've seen a lot of defense of Hitler saying he was protecting ethnic Germans in Czechoslovakia and Poland. You can't claim that and also say his goal was to protecting white people. Clearly German people rated higher on the scale
Dude was ethnically French, raised in Belgium, and was a devout Catholic, why is he pro-German race?
The Franks were a Germanic tribe. They may have latinized, but they were still brothers to the tribes who stayed in Germany and the tribes that invaded Britain.
Except being Pro German meant making conjuring up lies about Jews creating pornography, owning transgender clinics and impoverishing people with usury. None of which are true. Not to mention befriending squatting terrorists in Israel in order to exterminate the Jewish race.
there's a reason why they never allowed people to hear what the German NatSocs themselves had to say. Because if people heard what they said , they'd realize the Germans were actually very reasonable and would probably even agree with them.
Really? How reasonable was operation Barbarossa again?
It was a pre-emptive strike. Or do you think Stalin amassed the largest standing army with the largest tank and air force in the entire world by far for shits and giggles?
Why would you do a pre-emptive strike on an ally you've been shipping goods to, and has literally no plans at invading you?
Why would you aggressively and violently expand your sphere of influence and threaten the strategic supply lines of your ally while building airfields close to the border and amassing a tank and air force larger than the rest of the world combined when you have literally no plans of invading the rest of Europe?
Yeah, he showed that quite clearly by occupying the entirety of Eastern Europe after the war. I guess that's also why the Cold War started.
I get you’re a pathetically retarded jeet, but your stupid ass seriously can’t comprehend the difference between invading Eastern Europe and invading Germany? Where’s the Russians operation Barbarossa you stupid jeet poolicker?
Yeah, I never denied that. The issue is that Stalin seemed genuinely to believe that he had secured a lasting peace with Germany, due to his shock at the invasion, his complete lack of response to it early on, his authorization for military parades with the Wermacht during the alliance period, and given the massive economic support that Germany had been giving the USSR.
What was Germany doing during that exact same time cupcake? Were they standing down their military? Also Russia didn’t have the largest Air Force, they also built 95% of their aircraft AFTER GERMANY INVADED. Same with the tanks, 90k out of 102k Russian tanks were PRODUCED IN THE LAST 3 YEARS OF WW2. Why are you lying through your teeth faggot?
Are you trolling?
Are you retarded? Shall we go over the production numbers together pookums?
The Stalin regime merely wanted peace!
With Germany (though not with Ukraine, Poland, or Finland). It's not my fault Communists are retarded enough to believe Hitler.
Stalin was afraid of krauts striking first too.
No, he wasn't. That's why he got caught with his pants down and needed to bailed out by the US.
Wait your stupid ass is now claiming Russia, who was going to attack Germany imminently got caught with their pants down by an attack on the supposed front he amassed the biggest army ever and needed to be bailed out by the US? You truly are the most pathetic jeet faggot in existence, go back to sucking on shit you degenerate retarded faggot.
Is it really so difficult for you to grasp that a surprise attack has a tendency to catch someone with their pants down? If you're not prepared for a defense it is rather difficult to defend yourself.
You've made it quite clear that you got all your knowledge of WW2 from Hollywood slop as you seem to think that the Germans were some sort of Ubermensch that started their invasion with Tigers and Panthers instead of mostly Panzer IIs and IIIs that were ill equipped for tank vs tank warfare.
How do you think France got stomped so quickly? A year after they've declared war on Germany. How do you think Rommel slapped the Brits around in Africa despite being vastly outnumbered? Because of Wunderwaffen?
Yes you stupid jeet, you don’t “surprise attack” their main concentration of military, unless you’re a pathetic lying jeet faggot and the majority of the actual Russian engagement was… in Finland before Germany attacked.
Preparing for an offensive is not the same as preparing to defend against one, which is why the concept of preemptive strikes exists.
No you stupid jeet, you have zero clue what you’re talking about. Preemptive strikes exist to hit someone WHERE THEY ARENT EXPECTING IT, NOT WHERE THEY SUPPOSEDLY AMASSED ALL THEIR FORCES. For example, Poland where the Russian forces weren’t concentrated at the time. You truly are a low iq jeet
You mean what he did in response to Germany invading Poland? Do you think if China took Taiwan the US would expand its military?
You mean the joint invasion of Poland?
...OOF.
Haha.
The US and the taliban also jointly attacked Russia, tell me, did they consider themselves allies?
The US invaded Russia in Afghanistan with the Taliban who only sprang into existence 5 years after the Russians fucked off? Shit nigger I guess I missed that.
You really should stop here and not embarrass yourself any further.
Did you not know that the taliban was formed by the mujahideen? Or do you just need semantics to frame stupid arguments like Germany “preemptively striking” russia?
well the Russian people themselves supported it https://archive.md/t0f7z so i think its reasonable.
So the systematic slaughter of 60% of Slavic people is reasonable? Russian people were stuck between a communist hell and Nazis promises, of course the Nazis didn’t tell them they were planning on mass slaughtering the majority of them to expand aryan lands, but you conveniently left that part out.
Nice bullshit atrocity propaganda you have there
Denying a white genocide? Nice one, idiot.
More like denying your atrocity propaganda . Or you want me to start talking about the White genocide that jewish Bolsheviks caused in Russia?
I want you to acknowledge the mass murder of Poles, Ukrainians, and Greeks by the "White Supremacist" Nazi regime.
Oh really! So you’re now claiming operation Barbarossa wasn’t a thing? Or that it clearly planned the mass slaughter and takeover of Slavic territory? Funny how that works
Not to mention the insane atrocities committed by the Nazis in the Katyn Forest. All cleverly ignored by the Nazi larpers.
Like I said, you're my favorite troll!
That was the Soviet secret police, under Stalin. It was the Germans who discovered evidence of some of the Soviets' massacre of the Polish prisoners of war.
And don't forget the Nuremberg court rejected the commie claims about Katyn.
Yeah, I'm not a Nazi sympathizer like many here who joined post 2020 are, but attacking communists bent on world domination is a good thing, the first attacks were on land the Soviets had just stolen from Poland. Why you would pick that of all things to criticize...
And where did Germany attack from? Was it from land they had just stolen from Poland? I’m criticizing operation Barbarossa which was a planned genocide.
"Was it from land they had just stolen from Poland? "
Yes, how is this relevant to whether Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union through Soviet occupied Poland, was bad?
"Barbarossa which was a planned genocide"
Of communists.
Who killed more polish?
Calling all Russians communists then is the same all calling the USA socialists
Hitler's handling of WWII can be criticized. In hindsight, there likely were ways for him to win but he lost.
Ultimately, the USSR needed to be attacked and dismantled. Many Americans realized this also after WWII with Generally Patton famously writing that they attacked the wrong enemy (meaning he thought the USSR was worse than the Nazis and the USSR should have been the target). The cold war basically proves this.
Hitler realized the USSR threat and attempted to thwart it but it was a tactical/strategic error.
Shut up, Qatari. Just because you are too stupid to read Nazi racial theory, it doesn't mean everyone else isn't allowed to.
No? then why are nazi books banned on Amazon? Why don't history "documentaries" ever translate Hitler's speeches? why can't i post the post that OP just posted on Patriots.win or in the majority of places on the internet without getting banned or censored?
A free translation of Mien Kampf is the 3rd result in Google you utter buffon.
https://www.literatibookstore.com/book/9781483707181
Can be shipped in 2-5 days. Why are you a disingenuous faggot?
I bought a copy off Amazon 5 months ago.
Why is the turner diaries banned on amazon?
Hopefully because it gets boring by the halftime mark.
Well translations of Hitler's speeches are really easy, German isn't some ancient semitic language that died 3000 years ago.
I can understand German, and pretty much all his speeches boil down to this
So you're saying Orange Man really is Hitlerian after all!
Checkmate, MAGAts!
/s, obviously.
No, both Hitler and Trump had populist messaging, but it doesn't mean the 2 are the same, far from it. Racism was a core Tenet of National Socialism, anyone who was deemed "Untermensch" was fit only to be enslaved or exterminated.
Trump does not hold racist nor antisemitic views.
Shutup jew
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
I don't think this merits harassment, it's a response to a comment. It may be mean, but a mean comment doesn't necessarily make it a bannable comment.
What, calling everyone he disagrees with "Qatari" as if that entire identity group is conspiring doesn't violate rule 16?
I'm not seeing him say Qataris are X. I'm seeing him say one person is a Qatari. Is he saying other's are Qataris and that Qataris are inferior? Is he saying that Qataris as an ethnic group are doing something?
If someone says "I think you're JIDF" that isn't in and of itself a violation of Rule 16. Government intelligence agencies are not a racial conspiracy. Saying something is a CIA operation isn't an attack on whites.
If I called everyone who disagreed with me here a jew, you know you'd give me a timeout at the very least.
That’s some jeet logic right there. Tell me, does all that poo cause your low iq?
Ah, of course, rule 16 only applies to bankers. Nice shabbos goyim logic you're showing.
😂😂😂 “I can’t tell the difference between an individual and a collective”
You must be a socialist faggot 😂😂😂😂
Well, I can definitely tell the individual I'm currently speaking with is a boomer-brained shitskin.
Maybe this is why top black scholars like Kanye West are attracted to it.
I'm in the strange position of having more in common with racists of other races than "anti-racists" of my own race.
It's not that strange. Just how we can appreciate regular old nationalists from other nations. People who have the back of their people (preferably without - unreasonably - hating others) are generally deserving of some level of respect.
No one good likes cowards and traitors, and most appreciate bravery and honor.
There are plenty of bad racists, or all races, but there are also plenty of good racists, of all races.
I don't even think there is "unreasonable" hate short of something like severe mental illness. Hate is a powerful and taxing emotion. To truly hate someone (or a group of someones) they have to either have betrayed you or threatened someone/something you genuinely love. I wouldn't hate any group that hadn't done at least one of those things, like I couldn't care less about Eskimos or Sentinel Islanders or Amazon jungle head-shrinkers or Congolese pygmies. I don't even remember they exist most of the time.
My point is, there are some black nationalists/racialists/supremacists/whatever that you can get along with. There are others that are terrible and hateful people. Same for any other similar groups of other races.
It's basically positive versus negative racialism. Do you love your own group, or hate outgroups? There are plenty of very resentful and absurd racists.
True. I'd say zionists, more specifically talmudists are probably the worst of the racists (and yet are often the most vocal "anti" racists)
Can I even comment yet or am I still banned by dom for hurting his feelings
You're so back.
I literally tell you how long your banned for. The ban message even includes it if I forget.
Whites are the only group ever explicitly told our culture and bloodlines shouldn't have a future.
Oh nice…..well, anytime you place your race/nation at the forefront, at least in the west, there’s always a certain group of outsiders living in your midst who know you placing your needs first means they can only succeed as much as the average goyim, so yo them, that’s one of the most sinful things goyim can do, you are essentially refusing them control over your nation/economy.
When that Master Race meets those Chosen People, all hell breaks loose!
Only at cinemas!
Stop making shit up. National Socialist racialism was explicit that Germans were the only pure-blood decedents of Aryans, and Aryans were the founders of all nations on Earth. Jews were a subversive race that destroyed nations. Blacks were animal race. Asians were an animal race that bred with Aryans and explains how they formed civilizations. Slavs were an inferior polluted blood race that needed to be exterminated in order to preserve Aryans.
Your retarded apologetics makes no sense within National Socialist ideology. There's no such thing as 'all other races did the same for themselves'. Other races can't improve themselves within Aryanism. They are inferior and diluted blood races that physically can't improve, because civilization and nations can only descend from Aryans who are the decedents of Hyperborean. There is no rising of any other races. That's the whole reason Hitler needed to pogrom other races and ensure "breathing room" for the German race. Other, inferior, races were not able to be 'lifted up'. By his own ideology, the only thing he could do is prevent the Germans from being diluted.
Why do I have to explain Nazi ideology to you? How is it you want to worship Nazis, but you're clearly not familiar with Mien Kampf, never read Himler, don't know Nazi racial laws, and didn't read "Passing of The Great Race"?
Listen retard, all I'm asking you to do is agree with yourself.
Admit that German National Socialism wasn't just "boy howdy I think being German is cool". Just admit that it has a strict racial hierarchy, and they saw lots of races as inferior, including jews.
Just stop lying. The post is a lie. We both know it, I just want you to try being fucking honest for once.
I'll grant you this: It sure as shit doesn't NOT make them lesser...
Jesus dude. Again, National Socialism doesn't give a shit about 'White' society. 'White' is a British/American racial construct. They give a shit about German society. You're race mixing your definitions here. The Franks, Italians, Anglos, the Slavs, they are all of diluted blood and are by definition inferior races. Being European doesn't make them less inferior. Read Himmler if you are confused.
You don't leave inferior races alone under National Socialist ideology. Demographics is destiny, and therefore lesser races may out-breed superior races, and it is the nature of might through history for superior races to exterminate lesser ones and take their resources for the expansion of the superior race. That is National Socialist ideology. This is not a debate. They believed this unironically, and was why lesser races should be driven to extinction: genocide was a moral imperative to ensure the survival and prosperity of a superior race. Conquest by the strong was righteous. The Nazis were not apologetic about their beliefs, I don't know why you're trying to make apologetics for them.
Maybe you don't believe that... but then why are you running interference for Nazism then?
who are you to talk about who does or doesn't give a shit about White society? you are anti White and you hated that people donated to the White woman who said nigger .
This isn't about me, it's about National Socialism. Hitler didn't give a shit about "White society", that's why he killed Slavs, bombed Brits, and tortured Franks. It's not about "Whiteness". It's about Germanness.
It is about you. You trying to talk about who is or isn't pro White is the same as a militant athiest trying to tell Christians who is or isn't pro Christian.
Except damn near every post you make, you hurl personal insults against people.
You are, by far, the most toxic person on this board.
I'm not trying to be apologetic nor am I trying to argue from a point 75 years ago but you are because you want to be hyper fixated on your interpretations of things you haven't actually understood because your brain can't handle it because you are an inferior race.
So then you agree, that the Nazis are not about Race Egalitarianism.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This is kind of also Rule 3, because it's a statement of moral inferiority of jews, but directed personally, so it's real violation is still Rule 16.
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Do not assert the moral inferiority of races.
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Do not assert the moral inferiority of races.
I think if anyone can really discuss this, there are basic questions to ask;
Is the German race seperate from the Aryan race? Because he's using German a lot and not a breath about Aryans.
When was this statement made? A statement given at Nuremberg is a bit different than a statement given during the war. I guess he made them in Spain after the war when he was exiled in Spain.
Dude was ethnically French, raised in Belgium, and was a devout Catholic, why is he pro-German race?
We have to be fair. I've seen a lot of defense of Hitler saying he was protecting ethnic Germans in Czechoslovakia and Poland. You can't claim that and also say his goal was to protecting white people. Clearly German people rated higher on the scale
That's the problem with the war, it's still to much of a myth to discuss without people being angry.
The Franks were a Germanic tribe. They may have latinized, but they were still brothers to the tribes who stayed in Germany and the tribes that invaded Britain.
Except being Pro German meant making conjuring up lies about Jews creating pornography, owning transgender clinics and impoverishing people with usury. None of which are true. Not to mention befriending squatting terrorists in Israel in order to exterminate the Jewish race.
Alvin Goldstein, cite the source man.
My guy all of that is true
He knows. He's, in my opinion, a hilarious troll pretending to be a retarded Zionist.
He was calling Arabs "tunnellers" immediately after the NY Jew tunnels came to light, among other absolute bangers.
Dude's hilarious, once you realize the game.
I mean, big if true. Would be a genius way to redpill en masse.
Just look at his stuff, it's amazing.
You are my favorite troll.