Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

101
I feel so bad for the kids. (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 1 year ago by weltallic 1 year ago by weltallic +101 / -0
39 comments download share
39 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 35 ▼
– Adamrises 35 points 1 year ago +35 / -0

Women really should be banned from making "lel relatable" webcomics. It just creates this horrible feedback loop of politics and emotional spiraling.

I think only the one with the catmom didn't fall into this trap, afaik.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– Gizortnik 31 points 1 year ago +31 / -0

I almost wonder if we should just ban women from social media altogether. It seems like it has, effectively, no positive outcome for women. Best it can do is create a Longhouse for some of the pretty ones.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 38 ▼
– Adamrises 38 points 1 year ago +38 / -0

At that point I think banning social media period is more healthy.

Because LinkedIn proves that guys aren't much better in terms of keeping it a useful and healthy thing when its catered to their interests.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– Ricky_CIA 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0

Social media is this century's asbestos.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– MassivePecorino 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

There's a reason why people cite Uncle Ted when talking about social media. The vast majority of humans cannot handle social circles greater than ~100 people, and cannot integrate technology into their lives in a logical way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– KekistanPM 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

I'm on LinkedIn for three reasons: To make it easier to find work if I decide to move on, to have a pulse on what's going on in the industry, and to know who to avoid in the industry. I never post anything unless its to promote something I worked on.

The last reason is easy to fill because sooner or later someone always goes full redditor and writes a wall of text starting with "I can no longer stay silent over bad orange man shitting on everything. So here's what I need all of you and the whole rest of the world to do right now..."

There's also the occasional gem where a boomer CEO complains about how lazy people are and how hard it is to find good employees. Those are fun to read; especially when the comments section has a lot of posts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

There are plenty of valid uses for all the social medias. I use Facebook (my only one) to keep contact with my poor friends who can't afford a phone or simply very old school friends who I'd never text but am marginally interested in their life.

But there are many men who use LinkedIn as god and those connections as real major things. Its a huge part of "Hustle Culture" and guys whose entire existence is to use and abuse it to groom impressionable young men into being slimy douches whose life revolves around money for zero value ventures (that rarely work) and other nonsense.

Its like Discord for 20 something dudes with a lot of spunk but no sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Gizortnik 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Not even gonna challenge that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– TheOutlaw 25 points 1 year ago +25 / -0

I don't almost wonder. I know for a fact that it's a good idea. For every porn addicted man there are thousands of women whose social media rotted brains make the porn addict look like the personification of mental health.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Gizortnik 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

If attention for women is like porn for men; then I think we have an answer for why it should be restricted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– systemthrowaway 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

I'm at the point where I think women shouldn't be allowed to read or go outside without a familial male chaperone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 1 year ago +20 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– systemthrowaway 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Women just don't have the intuition or conscious men have. Teach them to read and they'll believe everything they read. Allow them to go outside and they get knocked up. There's a reason why every successful civilization kept them subservient to men.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Yes. Obviously.

There's also a good case to be made for banning them from the internet entirely.

However at this point I'll settle for banning social media itself because that's a more realistic goal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– akira2501 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

women are going to be women. that's why you can't live with them and you can't live without them.

none of this would work without the reddit manipulation machine. reddit should just be banned. use the alien enemies act against it's board. send spez to CECOT.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Devidose 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

The comic where the family are all talking anthropomorphic cats? I have a feeling I've seen a retarded take by that one along political lines so wouldn't be so sure it's exempt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I'm sure its had a retarded take, we all have them sometimes, but I can at least expect a comic with a joke in it most of the time when I see it posted somewhere.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Queen of Wands creator fell off the face of the internet and didn't have any drama during her tenure from what I recall. Definitely one of my favorite comics and really did a good job of capturing the feeling of the era in which it was written. It's a nice little time capsule to revisit now and again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
View 1 more comment
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– MAGAnic316 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

You asking for the comic or the OF? 🤨

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– Filo76 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

After my 5 minutes of research, it is a webcomic artist. Everything checks out too. Her earlier work turned very anti-Trump and MAGA and she does indeed have an onlyfans. She’s not even that attractive. She’s just whoring herself out because she found some Reddit simps who will throw money at her because orange man bad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– akira2501 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

I'm reasonably certain that 90% of the money that reportedly gets "earned" on OF is just a deep state money laundering mechanism. The overhead is used to direct political propaganda into the nation through these unwitting vaginas.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– systemthrowaway 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Bingo. 80% of reddit is already bots and a shitty webcomic is even more niche. You could probably count the number of men who have jorked it to her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MAGAnic316 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I was just busting your chops, bro. Sorry

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

Going by the earlier comics, you know when she was still just a comic artist, the kids are already fucked up considering how they were depicted.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Impishdesire 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I do know for I am her kid

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

Just another thot attention whore that lives off simp validation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LastRights 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Exactly. Who?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– LastRights 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Badly drawn comics.

They forgot to add that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

I get the idea that she's trying to vent frustration about the world.

But if you get offline and spend time with actual people, you'll notice life isn't so bad, despite the media telling you it is.

The fact that her comic went from fun and interesting things to venting frustration means she doesn't talk to anyone outside of her bubble, so everyone clearly and obviously thinks like she does.

Any pushback is just chuds and nazis and drumpf. I know because reddit told me.

It's sad to watch someone in real time cry for help like this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– FurryMLG 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Holy shit is that female Andrew Dobson?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy