Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

107
Based conservative Supreme Court did it again! (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 1 year ago by SparkMandrill83 1 year ago by SparkMandrill83 +107 / -0
33 comments download share
33 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 47 ▼
– Mpetey123 47 points 1 year ago +47 / -0

Alito and Thomas were the 2 I'm guessing

permalink save report block reply
▲ 47 ▼
– Tundinator 47 points 1 year ago +47 / -0

Not only are you correct, but the dissent from Thomas was hella based.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– YesMovement 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

We wouldn't expect anything less.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 41 ▼
– Ahaus667 41 points 1 year ago +41 / -0

The Trump picks were all massive letdowns.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– Kienan 33 points 1 year ago +33 / -0

He really shouldn't have appointed three women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0
▲ 25 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 25 points 1 year ago +25 / -0

Once again everyone should remember that the "Trump picks" were actually Mitch McConnell, Federalist Society picks. None of them would have been any different under any other Republican president and Trump had no power to nominate anyone he personally wanted.

The Federalist Society is a "conservative" legal society that scouts and develops Supreme Court nominees decades ahead of schedule. For example, Amy Coney Barrett was already a meme in the conservablogger sphere when Romney was running for president.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– current_horror 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

He literally went 0 for 3.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– XBX_X 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

Trump always surrounds himself with snakes and sycophants who always betray him.

Trump drives away Lazarus to embrace Judas. He can't pick his own friends; it's his curse!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 42 ▼
– akira2501 42 points 1 year ago +42 / -0

"Increasingly used in crimes."

So, the Second Amendment needs to be abrogated because DEI law enforcement can't do their jobs? The fuck does one have to do with the other?

Means. Motive. Opportunity.

A man with the motive and opportunity will discover the means.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– XBX_X 20 points 1 year ago +20 / -0

So-called "legal" and "traceable" guns can have their serials filed off. Then what?

Their arguments are total bullshit and they know it. But as always, "It's for your safety, citizen."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– YesMovement 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Founders: "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" There, that should be pretty simple for future generations to understand!

SCOTUS: Obviously the founders meant "unless too many people start using them to commit crimes"!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Kaarous 24 points 1 year ago +24 / -0

Said it before and I'll say it again.

Every bit as much as the media, the judiciary is the enemy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

Supreme Court has been a joke since Wickard v Filburn. Maybe even longer than that but I'm already angry enough.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– YesMovement 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Holy shit, I just heard of this one.

tl;dr a farmer grew "too much" wheat to feed animals on his own farm according to the government and even though he wasn't selling it SCOTUS said it still somehow constituted "commerce" because reasons.

The Court decided that Filburn's wheat-growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for animal feed on the open market, which is traded nationally, is thus interstate, and is therefore within the scope of the Commerce Clause.

That one needs a Dobbs reversal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TriangleGang 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Wickard v Filburn

Ah yes: you grew this wheat for your own private use, but it's existence impacts the markets because now you won't be buying something that you otherwise might have bought, therefore it's "in or affecting interstate commerce".

A ridiculous argument that, taken to its logical conclusion, grants the federal government unlimited power over everything because every act or failure to act and every piece of property or raw material can potentially affect interstate commerce in some sort of six degrees of separation way.

America as the founders envisioned died in the Civil War, but the 20th century, particularly the New Deal saw the destruction of even the pretense that the nation consists of numerous sovereigns with a federal government that only exists for a few limited purposes and has no powers beyond those granted to it by the Constitution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Tundinator 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

From what I gathered on a quick skim of the majority opinion the SCOTUS basically said 'no it's not really wrong but you do have to show why this violates the act, and do so specifically per product'

we'll see if they ever do though.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– computadora 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

I'd be really interested to see ghost gun murder statistics

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Kienan 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Very high. But a "ghost gun" is a legally produced and sold gun, that was at some point stolen or sold, and had the serial number filed off.

If we're talking homemade guns, like they always try to conflate...practically nil.

All so called "ghost guns" used in crimes are just normal guns that have been defaced in some way. It's fearmongering and attempting to backdoor even more tyranny.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

They used to use guns like that as a type of money. I could get a gun for doing someone else's paper.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

You see this is 4d chess to expose the swamp. İn 2 weeks Trump will make an announcement that his picks will be relocating below Area 51 to assist the aliens.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– nikgtasa 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

But i was told Trump literally picked everyone in the government and handpicked the courts and they're all evil and republican.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– SicilianOmega 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Inb4 the 7-2 SCOTUS ruling that Trump can't defund USAID, deport Tren de Aragua members, or secure the border.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Man, this really, really, really sucks.

This shit is important, and getting it wrong at the Supreme Court level like this will have ramifications for decades. Unless this is one of those "narrowly tailored" gayops from Roberts, haven't looked into this particular case. But it's still bad regardless.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– TriangleGang 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Apparently the fools on the pro-gun side argued only a point of minutia: that the P80 kit didn't fall under the definition of "readily convertible" to a firearm based on where the definition fell in the text. The ruling was narrow in that it held some kits meet the definition ("we'll know it when we see it"). They didn't even challenge the constitutionality of the law under Bruen's text/history/tradition test.

When you challenge a law, you list every possible reason you claim it should be struck down, because you never know which argument will be the winner, and you're stuck with the arguments from the original trial on appeal.

The Obamacare lawsuit was the model for how you do it. The Republicans threw every objection they could think of in the filing, which was a good thing, because they won on some obscure Medicare cost sharing rule instead of the primary argument that it was illegal for the feds to force you to buy insurance from a private company.

The court ate up the bullshit claim that the penalty was a tax, even though it was always called a penalty until they were defending it in court. It would have been game over right there if that was the only argument in the filing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– PraiseBeToScience 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

So, unpopular opinion: I'm kind of like "who gives a shit" on much about the second amendment anymore... It's just grown tiring hearing chest-beating 'muh sekint amendurr' from LARPing rednecks who want to play with toys but won't admit that that's all there is to it.

Go to any forum full of those kinds of people, that talks about 'muh 2a SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED' and post the schematics for making your own home machine gun, and you'll be banned faster than you could ever be banned on Reddit. There is nothing criminal about gun schematics for machine guns. There is nothing criminal about detailed instructions for making your own home suppressors. Even if I showed off my entirely illegal third-pin-drilled, homemade autosear equipped (for DOUBLE the fun!) AR15, guess what, that isn't a fucking crime for you to have that image on your forum, or to look at it. It's like thinking looking at Hunter's cocaine is a crime. But Fudd-run cesspools like AR15.com are militant about that gay shit because MUH FEDS.

Having an unstamped machine gun is literally just an issue of taxation, but I've met zero shit-talkers who are doing some underground criminal shit. For fuck's sake, go to an AK forum, and you'll find them all taking 922(r) "required US made parts" super-seriously, and making sure all their guns are in compliance, because they're a bunch of bootlicking fags.

When the bump stock ban came down, they all hid their bump stocks, because at the end of the day, they will comply with anything, and the MOLON LABE shit is just them being poseurs. The issue of gun laws is primarily about their guns being toys than it is anything else, which also explains why things like "Sunday Gunday" are just about humblebragging with some wildly overpriced gucci rifle. It's just about showing off how rich and cool you are. Retards are dropping $4,000 for Wilson Combat shitheaps and trying to justify how great it is with completely subjective, immeasurable metrics they don't actually know, like "muh fit and finish".

Arm braces are a great example. EVERY SINGLE PERSON KNOWS AN ARM BRACE IS A FUCKING STOCK. YOU ARE FOOLING NOBODY. I bet fewer than 20% of brace owners have ever even strapped it to their arm. The entire point of the arm brace restriction was to be a loophole in the SBR law... that means arm braces existed because 'MUH COME AND TAKE IT' types dutifully spent millions of dollars on R&D, production, and purchasing these fucking gimmicks to make sure their SBR toy was super-duper legal and extra-compliant with laws they claim they will not comply with... but they literally did, otherwise who the fuck was buying the arm braces, and for what purpose?

It's not that I'm against the second amendment but hearing trashholes post the same copy-pasted Boomer rage on everything for decades just... kinda grows exhausting, y'know? They're a bunch of tough-talking hicks online but a bunch of mewling weeping yellow-bellied bootlicking pussies in real life, which is why a 17 year old kid in Kenosha was left to fight the rioters alone while all the "TRY THAT IN A SMALL TOWN" types hid in their trailers rage-posting their fantasy dreams online.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– TriangleGang 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Having an unstamped machine gun is literally just an issue of taxation

I'm honestly surprised that people charged with violating the NFA haven't challenged the law as cruel and unusual punishment. 10 years in federal prison for failure to pay a $200 tax? Shit, they've got nothing to lose adding it to their defense.

And those lying assholes swore in Miller it was a tax measure, not an attempt at illegal federal gun control, so they could use fedgov's own words against it (they cared just a bit more about the appearance of complying with the Constitution then; now they don't even bother).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 26 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 26 points 1 year ago +26 / -0

I believe it was sarcasm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– YesMovement 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I believe your mom was sarcasm!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

😡

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WitchHunterSiegfried 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Feel for it again award.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy