This is the NY prosecutor who is trying to railroad Daniel Penny.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
I'll bet the premise of jewish vengeance and survival means subverting the institutions of white nations to make sure whites get the short end of the stick at every opportunity.
The definition of "partisan" being used is "a member of an armed group formed to fight secretly against an occupying force." Her partisan father is Israeli, so the book is probably about the IDF's favorite pastime, murdering goy children.
Her father was a partisan fighting against Nazi Germany after the invasion of Poland. He failed to raise his daughter to not be a treasonous piece of shit, but his waging war against the invading force that murdered his parents doesn't deserve your spite.
Her dad's memoir was titled “The Defiant: A True Story of Jewish Vengeance and Survival”. I'd say she is carrying on her dad's will of Jewish vengeance just fine.
You say that because your hatred of Jews has made you retarded. Attacking the enemy of your enemy is not vengeance.
You really need to read these two links:
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/NHC/NewPDFs/GERMANY/GER.Polish.Atrocities.Against.German.Minority.in.Poland.1940.pdf
It details the reasons why Hitler invaded Poland. Poland was murdering ethnic Germans in the newly created Polish nation after WW1, which stole much of the territory from Prussia, where those Germans had lived for hundreds, if not thousands of years.
Great Britain had made a secret deal with Poland to instigate a war with Germany, and if a formal was broke out, Britain would ally with Poland, regardless of who was at fault for the war. This is why Britain and France declared war against Germany for invading Poland, but didn't declare war against Soviet Russia for doing the exact same thing, invade Poland, only a short time later in the same month of the same year. For example, in addition to Poland killing ethnic Germans en masse, they openly gave out their invasion plans of Germany multiple times, openly bragged that they could defeat Germany on their own multiple times, and they attacked German installations and farms, in German territory, multiple times.
The moment you figure out that the entire narrative surrounding WW2 is bullshit, the entire charade of propaganda you've been fed should fall away. If you continue to defend the "official" history of WW2, taught to you by known liars, who've lied to us about literally everything, even about other history and wars, then you're a fool deserving a fool's reward. I hope you don't, and that you give this alternative a chance.
Her father raised a genetic dead-end. Lolol
If that's really a woman, then no wonder she'd be bitter and resentful. She's utterly hideous.
That’s not why she’s bitter and resentful.
Lack of belief in Jesus and His Word leads to bitter and resent. Bigly.
The jury was deadlocked on first charge and could NOT move on to the following charges because the instructions didn't allow it.
Since the judge wants to find Penny guilty of something, anything, instead of declaring a mistrial, did something that is almost never done and dismissed the first charge the jury was already deliberating on, and instructed them to go back and deliberate for a verdict on the second charge.
As said by the very people/witnesses he saved from a violent, criminal lunatic threatening to kill people in a closed space : Daniel Penny saved them. He is a HERO. Yet the state treats him like a criminal.
And of course, the non-Whites who helped Penny restrain the violent criminal threatening to kill people, were not charged with anything.
Typical activist MO. Shamelessly trying to get the result they want instead of following the rules, and ignoring precedence while trying to carve out a new dangerous precedence. Thanks in no small part to the other activists making sure "their" judge gets the case. It's where we get the saying "Don't use California case law as precedent."
That's how it always goes. I recommend people read on things like "jury selection" process on a lot of big cases and see how its literally the Prosecutors hand picking people who will give them the result they want and forcing out people who don't have the right politics.
Many here have argued that White people have to stop playing by White society rules of jury standarts in a non-White society. And we are under non-White rule. Intersectional Race Marxism now governs us. That means stop sincerely disclosing they are in favor of self-defense and constitutional rights ( and thus get excluded from juries when the prosecutor needs woke juries ).
Instead refuse to convict White defendants when the allegedly injured party is non-White, because the majority of black jurors will aquit any black defendant no matter how obviously guitly if they can get away with it.
You should always retain a degree of skepticism for what is presented in courts, as judges and prosecutors often illegally selectively hide evidence to harm Whites, or men, during trial.
That is, when the prosecutor dosen't simply fabricate a false key witness as they did against George Zimmerman. ( ''The girlfriend of Trayvon Martin'' who testified to court was never his girlfriend, and never wrote the letter presented in court as if she authored it. She was so illiterate she was totally incapable to read any of the letter when asked to in court ).
While everything you say is true, it goes even further than this.
The Menendez brother thing is in the news again, and their trial is famous for the jury being hard deadlocked. Why?
Because women unquestioningly believed their claims about being molested by their father, all the holes in that story be damned. Where the men either didn't believe it possible or found it a shaky claim, because of aforementioned holes.
And courts will go on record saying things like "we excluded any juror who didn't believe in the death penalty" or "we dressed her modestly to make her look more appealing" which is literally playing manipulation games to get verdicts without any care of evidence.
Even the far left media is writing they over-charged the guy. The prosecution is just being stubborn
Every. Fucking. Time.
every WHAT time??!!?
...fucking?
She was the daughter of "Shalom"...
...And then you bother to highlight she was born in Isreal afterwards?
"Timothy was born to Americaman and Merica Stronginfree, oh, by the way, he was born in the USA".
Imagine the smell.
That's a dude
Maybe little mustache man was right.
There was no need to highlight the text lol.
The name gives it away.
Doubt.
Is this that wall that people mention?
No. She was born that ugly.
Thank God. For a moment I was concerned that Alvin Bragg was involved in some of this. This whole time I was worried that Alvin Bragg was targeting people along racial lines, and keeping NYC dependent on the government via Anarcho-Tryanny and Racialism. Thank god you were able to dissuade my concerns by finding an jew somewhere in New York.
She would be the same vile rodent whether she worked under Bragg or someone else.
That doesn't mean you ignore enemy action because jew attracted your attention like a shiny new toy.
Bragg would have only hired a vile rodent to prosecute Penny one way or another. The information here is useless.
And she would have a job opportunities elsewhere as long as people like her dominate the legal system.
"If the legal system were dominated by non-jewish Leftists, this would never have happened! Only jewish Lefitsts would act like Leftists!"
You consider me a leftist. If the legal system were dominated by people like me this would not have happened.
Are you kidding? It would be worse. It would be required. You would be putting people in prison for it.
If people like you were in charge, the only change would be in topic. You would be executing blacks for stopping whites from being assaulted because they have no right to interact with them in any condition. You would execute them because it's too dangerous to allow racial harmony to form. On the other hand, you would be executing whites for helping blacks being assaulted as race traitors. A white man rescuing a black man from an assault would be a demonstration that he is counter-revolutionary.
You would be so concerned about race that you'd never actually enforce the law outside of race regulation, and it would be your enforces committing the majority of the crime.
You're the same people. You're not special. you never do anything different.
Thanks for admitting your Cheka preference.
Lmao