This is the NY prosecutor who is trying to railroad Daniel Penny.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
The jury was deadlocked on first charge and could NOT move on to the following charges because the instructions didn't allow it.
Since the judge wants to find Penny guilty of something, anything, instead of declaring a mistrial, did something that is almost never done and dismissed the first charge the jury was already deliberating on, and instructed them to go back and deliberate for a verdict on the second charge.
As said by the very people/witnesses he saved from a violent, criminal lunatic threatening to kill people in a closed space : Daniel Penny saved them. He is a HERO. Yet the state treats him like a criminal.
And of course, the non-Whites who helped Penny restrain the violent criminal threatening to kill people, were not charged with anything.
Typical activist MO. Shamelessly trying to get the result they want instead of following the rules, and ignoring precedence while trying to carve out a new dangerous precedence. Thanks in no small part to the other activists making sure "their" judge gets the case. It's where we get the saying "Don't use California case law as precedent."
That's how it always goes. I recommend people read on things like "jury selection" process on a lot of big cases and see how its literally the Prosecutors hand picking people who will give them the result they want and forcing out people who don't have the right politics.
Many here have argued that White people have to stop playing by White society rules of jury standarts in a non-White society. And we are under non-White rule. Intersectional Race Marxism now governs us. That means stop sincerely disclosing they are in favor of self-defense and constitutional rights ( and thus get excluded from juries when the prosecutor needs woke juries ).
Instead refuse to convict White defendants when the allegedly injured party is non-White, because the majority of black jurors will aquit any black defendant no matter how obviously guitly if they can get away with it.
You should always retain a degree of skepticism for what is presented in courts, as judges and prosecutors often illegally selectively hide evidence to harm Whites, or men, during trial.
That is, when the prosecutor dosen't simply fabricate a false key witness as they did against George Zimmerman. ( ''The girlfriend of Trayvon Martin'' who testified to court was never his girlfriend, and never wrote the letter presented in court as if she authored it. She was so illiterate she was totally incapable to read any of the letter when asked to in court ).
While everything you say is true, it goes even further than this.
The Menendez brother thing is in the news again, and their trial is famous for the jury being hard deadlocked. Why?
Because women unquestioningly believed their claims about being molested by their father, all the holes in that story be damned. Where the men either didn't believe it possible or found it a shaky claim, because of aforementioned holes.
And courts will go on record saying things like "we excluded any juror who didn't believe in the death penalty" or "we dressed her modestly to make her look more appealing" which is literally playing manipulation games to get verdicts without any care of evidence.