Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

81
why is the White House so silent in the face of new global threats to free speech? (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by SophiesBoyfriend 1 year ago by SophiesBoyfriend +81 / -0
24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 42 ▼
– Unknownsailor 42 points 1 year ago +42 / -0

The professional class thinks free speech is a threat to its power. They are not wrong.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Sumsuch 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Scam artists fear people spreading word of their scams.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– Unknownsailor 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0

This blog entry goes into what I said before, that the professional class considers free speech a threat to their power:

https://empiresmustfall.blogspot.com/2024/09/narrative-warfare-ten-years-after.html

GamerGate was one facet of the war against global homo. It was one of the early incidences. Brexit and the election of Trump came later. To quote the article:

Gamergate is what forced Globohomo to go Mask Off about Narrative Warfare.

I will also recommend that everyone listen to the Tucker interview linked within that.

The US, post WW2, is a global empire. The US is the bad guys all over the world. As a retired member of the armed wing of Global Homo, you have no idea how much it pains me to type that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– evilplushie 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

when did the current administration care for free speech?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– FrozeInFear 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

When they demand porn be kept in school libraries.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

when it's convenient for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Hmm, are we sure it's not because Biden is dead?

I mean I doubt they'd give a shit from promoting their faggotry to defend free speech anyway but are we SURE he's not already dead?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TheOutlaw 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

When's the last time he appeared in public?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Playing Weekend at Bernies on the beach I think

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FrozeInFear 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's been a little while now. He has apparently been on vacations for the last two weeks. Tweet from last week: https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1828875888391270617

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Galean 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Who is against authoritarianism? Canada? UK? Germany?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– FrozeInFear 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

'The powers that be' have made a policy of free speech absolutism impossible. Every 'place' must be safe and welcoming for all* peoples, or else.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Assassin47 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

There's a lot to that. Diversity is our weakness. I've had non-Americans point out to the same thing as an observation about America. When you try to mix so many unrelated cultures together you start walking on eggshells to avoid conflict, but some people don't, and we end up with special privileged classes of people. Some people are more equal than others.

(it also extends to giving minority groups too much influence i.e. "America worships niggers")

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

because they support it and would love to do it here

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Assassin47 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

It's not even enough to "speak out" against threats to free speech. In Japan they neutered the Yakuza (we can argue whether that's a good thing but that's another debate) by making it illegal for businesses to pay "protection money" to the neighborhood thugs. Collectively it made it a waste of time for gangs to pursue those rackets. Another example is the longstanding American anti-terror policy of "don't pay ransom for hostages".

In an alternate reality where America wasn't the great satan it is, it would be imposing fines or worse against those American companies being held hostage for even attempting to comply with draconian laws overseas. Oh you think it's bad that Pavel Durov was locked up for refusing to give user data to the government? That's funny because we'll do even worse to Zuckerberg if he hands our citizen's data over to the French. When it no longer becomes profitable to hold our people hostage - because our multinats are more afraid of what we'll do to them than what foreign governments will - other countries would either stop doing it, or try to set up their own competing tech companies and keep us out of their markets altogether. It would have been far better for Google to stay out of the Chinese market than live under their rules - better for the people anyway, not for Sergey and Eric and Five Eyes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– c35312fb3a7e05b7a44d 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

that's because the white house is the one behind threats to free speech

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Archive of the tweet

  • https://ghostarchive.org/archive/HPLEX

Archive of UnknownSailors article

  • https://archive.ph/HIY6y

I like the term Narrative Warfare. I'm reading a book about that right now. It's a leftists saying the entire thing is Donald Trump's fault.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– covok48 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

You except a party that cheated their way to victory to respect speech that challenges them?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MegoThor 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Because the White House is one of the global threats to free speech.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MLGS 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

In less than a decade they did a complete 180 degree shift on how they feel about the concept of free speech, it doesn't bother them at all that they changed a fundamental belief, and they'll only get agitated if you point that out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Because the communists are also against free speech?

I don't understand why anyone thinks this is a legitimate question. We all know the answer. And if you don't know the answer, then you're a retard who shouldn't vote.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 83671R18 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Biden's in a coma after getting buttfucked by Mike Obama, Kamala Harris is out cold after doing 20 tonnes of crack in 5 seconds, that bald fuck is stealing more luggage for some reason, mop head actually can't read and the guy on her headpiece quit because of the toxic work environment and Barack Obama is in Epstein's Island V2.371b begging for more adenochrome from the glow-in-the-dark CIA niggers.

Of course the white house is silent.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy