a hospital which offers medical services to """treat""" mental illness can decide to remove child custody and recommend their mental illness """treatments""" for the child? and nobody sees the conflict of interest???
After Covid, at the least, "conflict of interest" became a verboten thought because to wonder about those would be to be a misinformation anti-vaxxer bad guy instantly.
Imagine if this was a mechanic working on your car. OBVIOUSLY the mechanic has a conflict of interest in their recommendations. Everyone understands that, so nobody would accept laws that allow the mechanic to impound your car until you do his recommended work. (generally, barring some annoying exceptions) We have a free market and can take our car somewhere else. That used to be the rule with doctors too: Get a second opinion. Yet because we treated Healthcare as something special and sacrosanct and not just a normal service transaction - instead a resource owned by "The People" - over time we've allowed a giant beast of government and bureaucracy to grow around the industry and create a protected Health Priesthood Class with incredible power in and outside the state. All in the guise of giving more people access to healthcare.
In July, 2022 — the boy made a second suicide attempt, and was re-admitted to Children's National as a girl.
He also had a second autism assessment in August, but at this meeting the foster mother removed him — claiming it was not necessary, according to the lawsuit.
The foster mother then died unexpectedly, with the boy believed to have been moved into the care of Ms Kelley, according to the lawsuit.
Foster mother in DC dying suddenly in the second half of 2022?
Possibly another jab death
The family say their eldest son was hard working and initially home-schooled, before being sent to high school at age 14.
He graduated a year later, and was then accepted onto an Associates degree in Engineering program.
...
Rather than treating [us] as patrons with legal and dignitary rights, the defendant... treated the parents as though they had harmed their son, even though the parents had never endangered their child and had home-schooled him to college entry at fourteen years old.'
Colleges have replaced high schools, since high schools stopped letting people fail out. That means modern colleges teach at about what used to be a grade 9, maybe 10 level, for their first year, to "catch up" all the quota students and bonus paycheck students that shouldn't have gotten in in the first place but did because high schools just arbitrarily give good marks.
So it's likely a homeschool thing, that he actually has a grade 9's knowledge in grade 9, instead of in grade 13.
I've always wanted to do it the other way, right? You sue me because you don't like what I do, and I want to make you find out right back. IDC for or about the rules; just try to work around enforcement. Courts aren't how I settle things, right? I don't go there. So I'd be looking for justice elsewhere, and I'd, to the extent that I can, insist that things are settled the old fashion way inasmuch as they involve me.
See, the issue is, these people have kids to take care of. Of course, what you're talking about is Very Bad in its own right and all that (I am an EU subject), but what will happen to this kidnapped kid if they spend the rest of their lives in jail?
This is why it's only when people have nothing to lose that they act in such Very Bad ways. They're quite good at making sure that people never have nothing to lose, just very little.
It's a collective action problem. But of course, if you can rouse the collective, there is no need for the Very Bad actions, because you can handle such misconduct in ways that are regarded as legitimate.
I'd work really hard to settle that another way. Not necessarily violence because you could pursue things socially. You may in fact end up in a situation where what is right is not the same as what is practical. I have empathy for someone in that situation, and I'd not judge them or propose a one-size-fits-all solution.
I'll take that as a compliment, but extralegal methods of settling one's differences don't always involve violence or threat of violence. Legal methods always involve the threat of violence (that's what government is). I prefer negotiation. If you can even get anywhere. Social pressure is another nonviolent tool that can be used with people who are reticent to negotiate.
With Brexit this may be true. But at least DC is still nominally bound by the US constitution. In the EU, you have no rights the ruling class is bound to respect. Whatever you are allowed to do is just what they have not decided to forbid at any given moment.
Unfortunately, the US is moving more and more towards that position as well.
a hospital which offers medical services to """treat""" mental illness can decide to remove child custody and recommend their mental illness """treatments""" for the child? and nobody sees the conflict of interest???
After Covid, at the least, "conflict of interest" became a verboten thought because to wonder about those would be to be a misinformation anti-vaxxer bad guy instantly.
Imagine if this was a mechanic working on your car. OBVIOUSLY the mechanic has a conflict of interest in their recommendations. Everyone understands that, so nobody would accept laws that allow the mechanic to impound your car until you do his recommended work. (generally, barring some annoying exceptions) We have a free market and can take our car somewhere else. That used to be the rule with doctors too: Get a second opinion. Yet because we treated Healthcare as something special and sacrosanct and not just a normal service transaction - instead a resource owned by "The People" - over time we've allowed a giant beast of government and bureaucracy to grow around the industry and create a protected Health Priesthood Class with incredible power in and outside the state. All in the guise of giving more people access to healthcare.
The Socialist ideal of "your children belong to the state" has pretty much come to fruition through certain medical fiats. They managed to find a way.
Was? No, is. He is at risk, and the longer the state has him away from his family, the greater that risk becomes.
We're back to African-American? What happened to Black?
If they aren't sure if they're for Biden, they ain't black!
They want you dead, your children molested, your cities in ruins, your history subverted, and they find it funny.
Foster mother in DC dying suddenly in the second half of 2022?
Possibly another jab death
He's getting accepted to college at age 15?
Is this a homeschooling thing? An autism thing?
Colleges have replaced high schools, since high schools stopped letting people fail out. That means modern colleges teach at about what used to be a grade 9, maybe 10 level, for their first year, to "catch up" all the quota students and bonus paycheck students that shouldn't have gotten in in the first place but did because high schools just arbitrarily give good marks.
So it's likely a homeschool thing, that he actually has a grade 9's knowledge in grade 9, instead of in grade 13.
But muh lawyers!!! But muh just sue them and win big money!!! Checkmate woketards ✋️
According to the simps, it's too easy. You just sue and the courts will, of course, side with morals and reason.
Wait until the Supreme Court rules it unconstitutional!
In which decade?
No standing!
No point in saying it. You do what you have to.
I've always wanted to do it the other way, right? You sue me because you don't like what I do, and I want to make you find out right back. IDC for or about the rules; just try to work around enforcement. Courts aren't how I settle things, right? I don't go there. So I'd be looking for justice elsewhere, and I'd, to the extent that I can, insist that things are settled the old fashion way inasmuch as they involve me.
See, the issue is, these people have kids to take care of. Of course, what you're talking about is Very Bad in its own right and all that (I am an EU subject), but what will happen to this kidnapped kid if they spend the rest of their lives in jail?
This is why it's only when people have nothing to lose that they act in such Very Bad ways. They're quite good at making sure that people never have nothing to lose, just very little.
It's a collective action problem. But of course, if you can rouse the collective, there is no need for the Very Bad actions, because you can handle such misconduct in ways that are regarded as legitimate.
I'd work really hard to settle that another way. Not necessarily violence because you could pursue things socially. You may in fact end up in a situation where what is right is not the same as what is practical. I have empathy for someone in that situation, and I'd not judge them or propose a one-size-fits-all solution.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
As physically close to the line as you can go without crossing it.
I'll take that as a compliment, but extralegal methods of settling one's differences don't always involve violence or threat of violence. Legal methods always involve the threat of violence (that's what government is). I prefer negotiation. If you can even get anywhere. Social pressure is another nonviolent tool that can be used with people who are reticent to negotiate.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2- Violent Speech
It's below the line.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
The allusion is clear.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Adding redacted benefits you with no sanction, but the Ryder truck is a huge problem.
Dom you are so pathetic.
With Brexit this may be true. But at least DC is still nominally bound by the US constitution. In the EU, you have no rights the ruling class is bound to respect. Whatever you are allowed to do is just what they have not decided to forbid at any given moment.
Unfortunately, the US is moving more and more towards that position as well.
Comment Reported for:
Huh. The impersonation one came as a surprise. Sorry, but you'll need a different name just incase.
Eh, DC is a foreign power.