The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments
You misspelled "evil".
Leftists will literally self-flagellate in the town square, they are nothing but shame, which is why they don't understand either pride or humility.
Leftists are also extremely good at "reasoning", which is to say "using words to convince people". Their whole schtick is that they've come up with a "reasonable" way to say that there is no objective Truth, ergo everyone is equally corrct, so only power matters.
They would be pathetic is they were actually trying to do good. But, since they're evil, they have the support of Satan in bringing darkness to the material world.
Performative shame isn't the same as actual shame. There is a reason why the word virtue signal was invented for them.
They will loudly declare all the shame and guilt in the world, but only because it benefits them to do so. In their home and hearts they feel none of it.
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).
Christians have been using that line of argument for years and it has never worked. Nobody cares .
As Ger111 said, the only way to stop all this is by either cancelling the blasphemers or advocating for blasphemy laws which i haven't seen modern Christians ever advocate for.
libtards exclusively side with minorities. if christianity was a minority religion in france and islam would be the dominating force, they'd have mocked islam in the ceremony
That hypothetical is unrealistic. Liberals do not support Christians in Iran, Syria, or Lebanon. (unless it's neolibs seeing an opportunity for regime change) This is a spiritual battle above all else.
if they "jumped at the throats of jews" they would have called out the fact that Biden's children are all married to jews and Trump's children are all married to jews and would have called out the disproportionate power that jews have on American politics, media and banking. But they didn't. They are only against israel.
Leftists support goat fuckers to a suicidal extent. Just look at what happened in Egypt during the Arab Spring. The leftists supported the Muslim Brotherhood, who promptly started purging them when they gained power with leftist help. They were only saved because the military stepped in for reasons of their own.
You still wouldn't allow it among "your people". And the first person to cite that to you would no longer be concerned of "your people", and would be treated as a race traitor.
There isn't a conversation to be had, because you don't really have principles at all. Just a friend-enemy distinction and a historical dialectic. Nothing further.
The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
You misspelled "evil".
Leftists will literally self-flagellate in the town square, they are nothing but shame, which is why they don't understand either pride or humility.
Leftists are also extremely good at "reasoning", which is to say "using words to convince people". Their whole schtick is that they've come up with a "reasonable" way to say that there is no objective Truth, ergo everyone is equally corrct, so only power matters.
They would be pathetic is they were actually trying to do good. But, since they're evil, they have the support of Satan in bringing darkness to the material world.
Performative shame isn't the same as actual shame. There is a reason why the word virtue signal was invented for them.
They will loudly declare all the shame and guilt in the world, but only because it benefits them to do so. In their home and hearts they feel none of it.
If these creatures were capable of shame, they wouldn't be dancing naked in the streets in full view of children as a fuck-you to their parents.
Sure, you can call it that. Ultimately it's "trying to change the nature of reality via language".
Most cultural "Christians" are judeo-christians.
There is the body of christ, those who follow him, and then there is the Judeo-Christians who go to buildings to talk about being "good".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).
On Reddit the fags are claiming it's not The Last Supper it is a Feast of Dionysus
it’s : “make them follow their own rules”
If we can have state sponsored mockery of christianity then let’s see it for islam.
Christians have been using that line of argument for years and it has never worked. Nobody cares .
As Ger111 said, the only way to stop all this is by either cancelling the blasphemers or advocating for blasphemy laws which i haven't seen modern Christians ever advocate for.
libtards exclusively side with minorities. if christianity was a minority religion in france and islam would be the dominating force, they'd have mocked islam in the ceremony
its weird but what can we do
That hypothetical is unrealistic. Liberals do not support Christians in Iran, Syria, or Lebanon. (unless it's neolibs seeing an opportunity for regime change) This is a spiritual battle above all else.
dunno man, just look at how they instantly jumped at the throats of jews after they invaded gaza
theyre going by the minority tierlist
if they "jumped at the throats of jews" they would have called out the fact that Biden's children are all married to jews and Trump's children are all married to jews and would have called out the disproportionate power that jews have on American politics, media and banking. But they didn't. They are only against israel.
To the Left, Israelis are "colonizers", therefore White.
exactly. They are going after Whites. Not jews.
Nah. It's just xenophilia. That's the left in a nutshell - they're like delusional weaboos for their exotic culture of the month.
.jpg posting is a cancer.
Laziness is a cancer. Look it up yourself. Proven redpill method.
Leftists support goat fuckers to a suicidal extent. Just look at what happened in Egypt during the Arab Spring. The leftists supported the Muslim Brotherhood, who promptly started purging them when they gained power with leftist help. They were only saved because the military stepped in for reasons of their own.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Call for violence
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
NatSocs don't believe in Free Speech one way or another. Don't appeal to rights you already rebuke.
You still wouldn't allow it among "your people". And the first person to cite that to you would no longer be concerned of "your people", and would be treated as a race traitor.
There isn't a conversation to be had, because you don't really have principles at all. Just a friend-enemy distinction and a historical dialectic. Nothing further.
You aren't criticizing, or even addressing issues. You're asserting perpetual race war. Your entire dialectic is false
This isn't a criticism of a religion. You're racializing Jews and asserting it as a racial base.