The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments
You misspelled "evil".
Leftists will literally self-flagellate in the town square, they are nothing but shame, which is why they don't understand either pride or humility.
Leftists are also extremely good at "reasoning", which is to say "using words to convince people". Their whole schtick is that they've come up with a "reasonable" way to say that there is no objective Truth, ergo everyone is equally corrct, so only power matters.
They would be pathetic is they were actually trying to do good. But, since they're evil, they have the support of Satan in bringing darkness to the material world.
Performative shame isn't the same as actual shame. There is a reason why the word virtue signal was invented for them.
They will loudly declare all the shame and guilt in the world, but only because it benefits them to do so. In their home and hearts they feel none of it.
Have Christians demanded that the director be fired from any job that he has ? Have Christians considered demanding that politicians bring back blasphemy laws ? i haven't seen Christians even try to suggest this. That's why i say Christians have no teeth and instead engage in "why didn't you do that to some other religion" . Which is pathetic.
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).
The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
You misspelled "evil".
Leftists will literally self-flagellate in the town square, they are nothing but shame, which is why they don't understand either pride or humility.
Leftists are also extremely good at "reasoning", which is to say "using words to convince people". Their whole schtick is that they've come up with a "reasonable" way to say that there is no objective Truth, ergo everyone is equally corrct, so only power matters.
They would be pathetic is they were actually trying to do good. But, since they're evil, they have the support of Satan in bringing darkness to the material world.
You mean leftists are extremely good at "pilpul"
Sure, you can call it that. Ultimately it's "trying to change the nature of reality via language".
Performative shame isn't the same as actual shame. There is a reason why the word virtue signal was invented for them.
They will loudly declare all the shame and guilt in the world, but only because it benefits them to do so. In their home and hearts they feel none of it.
If these creatures were capable of shame, they wouldn't be dancing naked in the streets in full view of children as a fuck-you to their parents.
Have Christians demanded that the director be fired from any job that he has ? Have Christians considered demanding that politicians bring back blasphemy laws ? i haven't seen Christians even try to suggest this. That's why i say Christians have no teeth and instead engage in "why didn't you do that to some other religion" . Which is pathetic.
Most cultural "Christians" are judeo-christians.
There is the body of christ, those who follow him, and then there is the Judeo-Christians who go to buildings to talk about being "good".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).