Closest rooftop is unsecured plus there’s a fucking ladder? No social media presence for a 20 year old leftist? They magically can’t get into his phone?
“Muh diversity hires, amirite?”
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Yep, leaning that way, although I think DEI incompetence is an important part of any good conspiracy. (when you want to steal an election you employ the dumbest loyal negros and women at key polling centers) They were planning to let the kid shoot and then bump him off the whole time. They didn't expect him to miss.
I do want to hear more about the shooter before making any firm conclusions.
I seriously doubt it.
if the deep State tried to assassinate trump, they wouldn't do it on live TV in front of a bunch of supporters. And they most especially wouldn't hire some amateur Columbine wannabe to pull the trigger.
An assassination of Trump would be in the form of a sudden heart attack from poison food or a pin prick from a handshake. it offers complete deniability.
Unless they wanted to send a message by blowing him up on 4k video. Prigozhin didn't have a quiet natural death.
The downside of using an experienced guy is that he'd have to essentially agree to a kamikaze mission, as we saw, plus his identity and history would be blasted over the country. Would look a little weird if he was a Marine sniper who did some contracting for the Agency no?
I'm halfway with you though, I could easily see incompetence instead of malice. We need a lot more answers.
It's both.
It's incompetence, and intentional allowance. That's my theory at least.
Most on the ground agents were legitimately incompetent. Higher-ups and planners were in on it, as well as potentially the sniper team.
I'm also wondering if there was a second shooter. If - big if - the information that the shooter was confronted by an officer seconds before the shots is true...it turns a pretty good shot into an amazing shot; assuming the confrontation is true (again, stressing that that's far from certain), it becomes harder to believe that he got so close to a headshot under those circumstances.
Crooks was almost definitely a patsy, and was killed as planned. Whether or not he was the primary shooter, and the one who winged Trump, is still up in the air.
This kid seems like a fucking mess. It's possible he is a genuine nutter, but I do wonder if he was used as a patsy.
I still maintain that this was the dumbest possible move they could make. There's no benefit for them, even if he had died.
I still maintain that their plan would probably have been to False Flag Biden with Patriot Front, and use that to justify a crackdown on the Republican party generally.
Unless they actually had orders not to fire, the snipers hesitating so long makes me think the shooter was a patsy. Who's patsy isn't clear yet, but the situation is so sketchy I do suspect some level of conspiracy, so I do think he was a patsy, and meant to die.
Also, it's not too late to go after Biden, and I'm worried that's part of the plan. The "Deep State" or whoever can overshadow the attempted assassination of Trump, and save themselves from Biden, by attempting to or succeeding in taking out Biden, and then blaming Trump/supporters/The Right.
Organic or otherwise, someone took at shot at Trump, you know, Literally Hitler. The current power structure needs for alleged "Trump supporters" to behave violently in turn. Sadly, I see at least the very real possibility of false flags and attacks against Democrats and minorities.
I'm still not clear on what the sniper saw or chose to do. It looked like he needed to adjust his rifle to get into position and had to look over his scope to see the target.
Maybe he thought he needed permission, maybe he was told he did, and maybe he was just out of position for the shot.
I think it was Edward Snowden??? or someone similar that said they've seen what happens. They just bring a unit of some kind in, plug it in and have full access. Maybe the local PD can't get in, but the feds can.
I don't think the DEI incompetence and deep state hit are mutually exclusive. JFK was a hit, and there wasn't incompetent secret service at the time. The SS just being useless is icing on the cake.
No no no, boys. If it was a real hit there would have been multiple redundant shooters. Didn’t we learn anything from JFK?
DEI incompetence serves as plausible deniability for the deepstate mafia to gaslight the public. It's a funny distraction for people unable to accept how deep malice has seeped in our institutions like rot.
Already said my piece.
What is the point of killing a 78-year-old obese man, who I'm sorry to say will die naturally soon enough - make him a revered martyr and God-like figure to tens of millions?
And if you're going to engage in such a high-stakes assassination attempt, why would you pick a guy who is so bad at it that 1 of his 8 (reported) bullets graze the guy's ear? Surely, as much as it is a bad to murder him, it's far worse to try and then fail.
Don't get me wrong. I don't put this past the deep state. I'm not saying they're too good and noble to do this. I'm saying they're too smart to do it. If it turns out that they're not smart, so much the better.
While your first paragraph is retarded because it's obvious what they stand to gain in the short-term, you're right about the deep state being more competent than this. Besides no social media presence? Locked phone? Those are absolutely squandered opportunities to steer the narrative. I don't think they'd be so wasteful.
Having worked as a federal contractor, I have some serious doubts about the notion that the government is competent in anything other than sporadic fits that cannot be planned around.
Considering that Trump got nothing accomplished in his first term that went against the Deep State, in their position, I would try to manage Trump rather than go to war with him. Hell, I'm pretty sure he would be in a worse position if they had not tried to sabotage him at every turn.
A president's second term is almost always a failure, or at least a disappointment. It won't be different for Trump. He likely won't get much accomplished as a lame duck, let alone when it goes against the Deep State. Now, weighing that against the downside of making him a martyr for all the ages, a new Gracchus who will inspire people 83 years from now? In their position, I'd prefer a Trump presidency 10 times over.
The people calling him the "end of democracy" would try to manage Trump instead of going to war right?
Assuming that was the plan, I think they just wanted to win the election. Then they would handle Biden as they see fit. And when I say "they" I don't pretend the Deep State is one coordinated blob. There are various factions with different levels of smarts.
Predictably retarded Antonio lol
Can you also explain why it is wrong?
You do realize that they're in debt now. right? They can't afford the things they could around 20, even 10 years ago.
What is your theory, then?
I don't pretend to know with so little evidence, but that does not require me to accept theories that seem rather illogical.