But the important thing is your family, traditions, and heritage will play no part in your A.I. arranged marriage. You'll be D.I.N.K.ing in no time and ending your white supremacist line.
It did not even cross my mind until you said it that this is yet another example of leftists rounding the horseshoe and stumbling onto ancient traditions with a modern coat of paint.
I think we've definitely hit the point where society would be healthier for a return to arranged marriages. If AI could be trusted to pair me up with someone with whom I could have a good chance to build a successful, happy marriage with...well I'd definitely consider it at this point.
On the other hand, everyone is so broken that I'm not sure a healthy marriage is even a realistic goal for the vast majority of people now.
I used to be in favor of restoring the old controls without resorting to arranged marriage, but I've also reached the point where I think arranged marriage is necessary. The problem is finding worthy female candidates. Even if we could somehow force modern women to partake it wouldn't be worth it. Marriage is supposed to be a virginity for provisioning arrangement, not a way for Chad's jizz rag to extort money from a beta. Removing the virginity requirement is the biggest and least talked about scam the feminists ever pulled off.
If AI could be trusted to pair me up with someone with whom I could have a good chance to build a successful, happy marriage with...well I'd definitely consider it at this point.
The problem is that any company that's in a position to do something like this is pozzed. You would never get a good wife out of the deal. Their algorithm would pair you up with some 300 pound boss bitch with 4 kids from 3 different baby daddies, at least one of whom isn't white.
Everyone is so broken because everyone is so pliable, and being pulled in so many directions. If we reach a point where we submit ourselves to AI-based eugenics breeding programs, well, one, we're all completely broken at that point, but two, the AI would have enough power to pull the people back together.
Ma'am ma'am, listen to me okay? ahcordin to our Ai, you must show bobs and vagene to mister rahjeet that was matched with you, please do the needful, okay?
They'd program it to scam danger hairs into sending foot fetish shit to their fellow pajeets. It would be the only part of the app that works correctly.
Bumble founder is essentially showing why men are going to go the ai waifu route as she now wants to us “AI” to filter out low value men.
Herd explained that the new technological advances coming to the world of dating apps include "AI dating concierges" going on "dates" with other AIs to narrow down a pool of suitors and assess who is genuinely worth going on a date with before one is scheduled.
Female solipsism on full display
“Our focus with AI is to help create more healthy and equitable relationships. And that also starts with yourself. How can we actually teach you how to date? How can we help you show up in a better way?” she told host Emily Chang.
This is actually deranged, authoritarian feminism making “equitable” relationships…
“For example, you could in the near future be talking to your AI dating concierge, and you could share your insecurities. I just came out of a breakup, I have commitment issues. And it could help you train yourself into a better way of thinking about yourself. And then it could give you productive tips for communicating with other people if you want to get really out there,” she continued.
Thank god, AI therapists to enable women now
“There is a world where your dating concierge could go and date for you with other dating concierges. Then you don't have to talk to 600 people. They would scan all of San Francisco for you say, ‘These are the three people you really ought to meet,’” she explained.
That may already be the case. AI will just accelerate matters further toward polygyny.
I suspect what AI is for is to deal with all the complaints from women who deem modern day dating to be "unsafe" and full of "strange creeps" (a.k.a. men they have to reject because they don't find them attractive) and wish for those men to be filtered out. Alongside pressure from western Governments to "protect women's safety".
The advantage the 5% have is being able to get sex from women at a reasonable price, which is all they're good for. I certainly don't envy the relationshit nonsense that women are trying to subject them to.
Much as I completely hate this idea, that is by far my favourite episode of that show, lol.
Crazy to see the idea that it is literally trying to warn us against become reality this quickly (at least in the mind of this idiot Bumble woman), though...
Single mothers and trannies should have to disclose and men should be able to filter them out. That would solve a lot of problems right there without the need for AI. AI would be useful for filtering out Chad chasers and whores looking for a chump to play house after they lose their game of musical dicks.
There is a world where your dating concierge could go and date for you with other dating concierges. Then you don't have to talk to 600 people. They would scan all of San Francisco for you
Why stop at dating? You could effectively make Her
become reality by letting your "concierges" partake in endless* simultaneous
instantaneous digital orgies.
Unironically, if the AI was developed using Christian moral values, it'd probably easily make the women date the actually good guys than chasing the 'chads' that don't care and already have their long term relationship set up.
Women have a lot more of a social bias and manipulating media through AI could correct that depending the parameters you set for it. I HIGHLY doubt it'll be set up that way but it's something to think about.
You'd need a lot more than a decent AI algorithm (which you would never get considering how pozzed the tech industry is) to get women to stop Chad chasing. The rotten culture would somehow need to be fixed. If that ever happened there wouldn't be any need for AI to fix the problem because it wouldn't exist.
I’ve tried online dating and unless you are is 9 or a 10 it’s tough. Plus women have a ton of options. I know they may get dirty messages but they do get a lot of messages from legit guys
The most unattractive woman has more options than the average male. And despite what red pill gurus in the manosphere will tell you, it doesn't get easier as you get older unless you have evidence of pre-selection and dating/relationship experience. Long term single men who are consistently striking out in dating won't have that.
I’m single and struggling in the dating department but I keep trying. I remember a guy making a point that pre internet dating an average looking guy could get together with an average looking woman, but now the average looking woman is flooded with attention. The times I could make it to a coffee date with online dating I imagine the date with me was one of many for them.
evidence of pre-selection and dating/relationship experience.
I remember a time when having a divorce under your belt was a negative, or at least something that would give a person pause when considering them as a partner.
I remember a time when having a divorce under your belt was a negative
It still is in the case of women. It's hard to find a bigger red flag than a willingness to destroy a guy in divorce court. The problem is that the SMP is so distorted that men will overlook a women with more red flags than a CCP parade in hopes of getting their dick wet. With men it's a mixed bag. It's evidence of preselection which is great for a man's SMV, but it also means the previous bitch already looted the coffers so there's less for whore number 2 to steal.
Divorced middle aged men have better outcomes in dating compared to their long term single male counterparts. And it's for those reasons. It feels counterproductive because what you said sounds logical but we're not dealing with logic when it comes to dating, we deal with observations.
I think college age has it easiest, especially if you are in college or have friends. After that, it is definitely harder. Old age just makes it easier if your income increases (which it does on average for most guys) or if you are okay with settling for less. Finding a girl who isn't a gold digger or slut is ideal but the good girl still has her choice of rich or poor guys, so she'll go as rich/other qualities as she thinks she can get.
College girls are some of the worst Chad chasers. They've written articles about "golden penis syndrome", which is just a fancy term they use to complain that college aged Chads won't commit. They blame it on the 40/60 male/female split, but of course they won't even spit in the direction of 38 out of that 40 percent.
Uh huh. What makes them think the bottom 95% of men this will inevitably filter out will stick around or even try in the first place? Dating apps are teetering on the edge of insolvency because men are realizing that they're a waste of time for anyone who's not Chad.
This is a hilarious idea. Train LLMs agents based individual's chat histories, simulate a long conversation instantly, and check the results.
Millions of dollars worth the parallel processing hardware just throwing pickup lines at itself until one lands and turns on a little green light somewhere.
But seriously this is them comparing profiles in a slightly different way and throwing $CURRENT_TECH_BUZZWORD at it. I'd be shocked if these apps hadn't been using collaborative filtering and/or neural networks for years.
You can't have machines programmed with 2024 American coastal liberal politics in charge of anything, especially if there's no way to pressure a human on the other end.
But the important thing is your family, traditions, and heritage will play no part in your A.I. arranged marriage. You'll be D.I.N.K.ing in no time and ending your white supremacist line.
It did not even cross my mind until you said it that this is yet another example of leftists rounding the horseshoe and stumbling onto ancient traditions with a modern coat of paint.
I think we've definitely hit the point where society would be healthier for a return to arranged marriages. If AI could be trusted to pair me up with someone with whom I could have a good chance to build a successful, happy marriage with...well I'd definitely consider it at this point.
On the other hand, everyone is so broken that I'm not sure a healthy marriage is even a realistic goal for the vast majority of people now.
I used to be in favor of restoring the old controls without resorting to arranged marriage, but I've also reached the point where I think arranged marriage is necessary. The problem is finding worthy female candidates. Even if we could somehow force modern women to partake it wouldn't be worth it. Marriage is supposed to be a virginity for provisioning arrangement, not a way for Chad's jizz rag to extort money from a beta. Removing the virginity requirement is the biggest and least talked about scam the feminists ever pulled off.
The problem is that any company that's in a position to do something like this is pozzed. You would never get a good wife out of the deal. Their algorithm would pair you up with some 300 pound boss bitch with 4 kids from 3 different baby daddies, at least one of whom isn't white.
Everyone is so broken because everyone is so pliable, and being pulled in so many directions. If we reach a point where we submit ourselves to AI-based eugenics breeding programs, well, one, we're all completely broken at that point, but two, the AI would have enough power to pull the people back together.
It wouldn't work for the same reason it would take 100 years of reprogramming to make a difference in the number of abortion fanatics.
Enjoy the pajeets who will be doing the coding for you.
Ma'am ma'am, listen to me okay? ahcordin to our Ai, you must show bobs and vagene to mister rahjeet that was matched with you, please do the needful, okay?
They'd program it to scam danger hairs into sending foot fetish shit to their fellow pajeets. It would be the only part of the app that works correctly.
Bumble founder is essentially showing why men are going to go the ai waifu route as she now wants to us “AI” to filter out low value men.
Female solipsism on full display
This is actually deranged, authoritarian feminism making “equitable” relationships…
Thank god, AI therapists to enable women now
80/20 is going to become 95/5 real soon
That may already be the case. AI will just accelerate matters further toward polygyny.
I suspect what AI is for is to deal with all the complaints from women who deem modern day dating to be "unsafe" and full of "strange creeps" (a.k.a. men they have to reject because they don't find them attractive) and wish for those men to be filtered out. Alongside pressure from western Governments to "protect women's safety".
The advantage the 5% have is being able to get sex from women at a reasonable price, which is all they're good for. I certainly don't envy the relationshit nonsense that women are trying to subject them to.
AI date simulation was literally an episode of Black Mirror.
Much as I completely hate this idea, that is by far my favourite episode of that show, lol.
Crazy to see the idea that it is literally trying to warn us against become reality this quickly (at least in the mind of this idiot Bumble woman), though...
can we use AI to filter out low value women? no? ok.
Single mothers and trannies should have to disclose and men should be able to filter them out. That would solve a lot of problems right there without the need for AI. AI would be useful for filtering out Chad chasers and whores looking for a chump to play house after they lose their game of musical dicks.
Why stop at dating? You could effectively make Her become reality by letting your "concierges" partake in endless* simultaneous instantaneous digital orgies.
*during subscription period
Unironically, if the AI was developed using Christian moral values, it'd probably easily make the women date the actually good guys than chasing the 'chads' that don't care and already have their long term relationship set up.
Women have a lot more of a social bias and manipulating media through AI could correct that depending the parameters you set for it. I HIGHLY doubt it'll be set up that way but it's something to think about.
You'd need a lot more than a decent AI algorithm (which you would never get considering how pozzed the tech industry is) to get women to stop Chad chasing. The rotten culture would somehow need to be fixed. If that ever happened there wouldn't be any need for AI to fix the problem because it wouldn't exist.
I’ve tried online dating and unless you are is 9 or a 10 it’s tough. Plus women have a ton of options. I know they may get dirty messages but they do get a lot of messages from legit guys
The most unattractive woman has more options than the average male. And despite what red pill gurus in the manosphere will tell you, it doesn't get easier as you get older unless you have evidence of pre-selection and dating/relationship experience. Long term single men who are consistently striking out in dating won't have that.
I’m single and struggling in the dating department but I keep trying. I remember a guy making a point that pre internet dating an average looking guy could get together with an average looking woman, but now the average looking woman is flooded with attention. The times I could make it to a coffee date with online dating I imagine the date with me was one of many for them.
I don't know if it's this one, but it's good. He probably had another on that topic specifically.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VviwQeV0mo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iHr5tJhTgA
Thanks!
I remember a time when having a divorce under your belt was a negative, or at least something that would give a person pause when considering them as a partner.
It still is in the case of women. It's hard to find a bigger red flag than a willingness to destroy a guy in divorce court. The problem is that the SMP is so distorted that men will overlook a women with more red flags than a CCP parade in hopes of getting their dick wet. With men it's a mixed bag. It's evidence of preselection which is great for a man's SMV, but it also means the previous bitch already looted the coffers so there's less for whore number 2 to steal.
Divorced middle aged men have better outcomes in dating compared to their long term single male counterparts. And it's for those reasons. It feels counterproductive because what you said sounds logical but we're not dealing with logic when it comes to dating, we deal with observations.
I think college age has it easiest, especially if you are in college or have friends. After that, it is definitely harder. Old age just makes it easier if your income increases (which it does on average for most guys) or if you are okay with settling for less. Finding a girl who isn't a gold digger or slut is ideal but the good girl still has her choice of rich or poor guys, so she'll go as rich/other qualities as she thinks she can get.
College girls are some of the worst Chad chasers. They've written articles about "golden penis syndrome", which is just a fancy term they use to complain that college aged Chads won't commit. They blame it on the 40/60 male/female split, but of course they won't even spit in the direction of 38 out of that 40 percent.
All of them get assigned a nigger migrant
Uh huh. What makes them think the bottom 95% of men this will inevitably filter out will stick around or even try in the first place? Dating apps are teetering on the edge of insolvency because men are realizing that they're a waste of time for anyone who's not Chad.
This is a hilarious idea. Train LLMs agents based individual's chat histories, simulate a long conversation instantly, and check the results.
Millions of dollars worth the parallel processing hardware just throwing pickup lines at itself until one lands and turns on a little green light somewhere.
But seriously this is them comparing profiles in a slightly different way and throwing $CURRENT_TECH_BUZZWORD at it. I'd be shocked if these apps hadn't been using collaborative filtering and/or neural networks for years.
You can't have machines programmed with 2024 American coastal liberal politics in charge of anything, especially if there's no way to pressure a human on the other end.