Scandinavian nations that are often propped up as an example of 'socialism done right' have also been racially homogenous. That is, up until the past couple decades with an influx of immigrants and whatever you do, don't compare the rate of sexual assault per capita with the immigrant population!
I've seen them make that 'argument' before. 'Sweden is socialist, vote for Bernie Sanders because he will make America like Sweden!!!' It's obviously disingenuous, but so are practically all of their arguments.
Firstly, Scandinavia isn't even remotely socialist outside of the broadest definitions of the word. If I psyche myself up as a Marxist, Scandinavia is absolutely capitalist: the economically productive means are practically completely privately-owned, not worker-owned (and not State-owned, for those who claim that State ownership is socialism), and welfare statism isn't intrinsically socialist.
Technically, Marx failed to predict the rise of welfare statism, but neo-Marxists have provided an 'explanation': welfare statism is a method that the bourgeoisie use to satiate the proletariat. Welfare statism is compatible with socialism, but all extant welfare states are, to Marxists, entirely capitalist. Marxists thus oppose these welfare states; they are still bourgeois. A laissez-faire welfare statist economy is far from Marxist socialism.
Secondly, even if it was socialist, it would still be positing a false cause. The success of those countries comes from their being high-IQ and monoethnic. Japan has those two strengths and has a third in addition, collectivism. Japaneseness still exists, despite it being under siege by the Japanese Left since the 1970s if not earlier. The worst offenders are Japanese Marxists and Japanese Greens: there is an overlap between anti-Japaneseism, Marxism, and ecocentrism.
Contrast that with the countries that these proponents of socialism are from, and they're moving in the exact opposite direction: lower-IQ, multiethnic, and atomistic/hyperindividualistic. People, firstly, do not care about, and, secondly, do not trust, each other. There is exceedingly little sense of We-ness; I-ness has largely replaced it. Those are among the reasons that their respective countries are unlike Japan. Japan, of course, is also moving in the same direction, but it will still be several decades before you see the kind of behaviour exhibited in this video seriously decline. I see the same regression in the parts of Asia with which I am more familiar; there, the young are noticeably different, in a bad way, from the old. A few years ago they even started asking students their 'pronouns' in the place with which I am most familiar. Looking at that country more widely, the film industry also betrays how affected they are by these winds of change: LGBT movies are a thing now (as in Japan), but they were not just ten years ago, and drug problems abound.
Scandinavia isn't as worthy of emulation as these people think: Sweden, for instance, has one of the highest rates of antidepressant use in the world.
I will also assume they're cards since the Japanese all over the screen at 0:14 says "nande toranpu?" which is something like "why are these cards here?"
Well it is less to do with racial homogeneity (same thing might happen in a nice "diverse" neighborhood) and more to do with a lack of low IQ thugs and retards around - which are more prevalent if you mix in certain races.
Somebody was saying something like successful societies look like the clan writ large. In a community small enough where everyone knows each other, you'd expect the neighbors to help because there is accountability. These people will see each other again. What Japan has done successfully is mirror that in a large society. to the point where people are shamed out of society the way they'd be shamed out of a family for bad behavior. I would argue the West lost that feeling, first, or maybe never had it. Even before people were worried about getting mugged by a black thug in LA, they were worried about getting mugged in England somewhere. People were strangers, enough, to attack each other and suppose they'd get away with it on account of anonymity.
I was watching Wardens (Montana), and a warden was following a drifter. I was thinking "this place is safe because you can't survive on your own out here. Though it's vast, such people as are out there know each other as they frequently help each other, which vastly increases the survivability out there."
They think if the japanese gave their entire country to blacks right then and there.. the blacks would act the same lol.
That magically.. if whites never existed, blacks and all the other poc (excluding asians since they are white adjacent) would be a utopian society that colonized mars, cured all diseases and evolve into pure energy.
Scandinavian nations that are often propped up as an example of 'socialism done right' have also been racially homogenous. That is, up until the past couple decades with an influx of immigrants and whatever you do, don't compare the rate of sexual assault per capita with the immigrant population!
Cool it with the racist dog whistles bro. /s
I've seen them make that 'argument' before. 'Sweden is socialist, vote for Bernie Sanders because he will make America like Sweden!!!' It's obviously disingenuous, but so are practically all of their arguments.
Firstly, Scandinavia isn't even remotely socialist outside of the broadest definitions of the word. If I psyche myself up as a Marxist, Scandinavia is absolutely capitalist: the economically productive means are practically completely privately-owned, not worker-owned (and not State-owned, for those who claim that State ownership is socialism), and welfare statism isn't intrinsically socialist.
Technically, Marx failed to predict the rise of welfare statism, but neo-Marxists have provided an 'explanation': welfare statism is a method that the bourgeoisie use to satiate the proletariat. Welfare statism is compatible with socialism, but all extant welfare states are, to Marxists, entirely capitalist. Marxists thus oppose these welfare states; they are still bourgeois. A laissez-faire welfare statist economy is far from Marxist socialism.
Secondly, even if it was socialist, it would still be positing a false cause. The success of those countries comes from their being high-IQ and monoethnic. Japan has those two strengths and has a third in addition, collectivism. Japaneseness still exists, despite it being under siege by the Japanese Left since the 1970s if not earlier. The worst offenders are Japanese Marxists and Japanese Greens: there is an overlap between anti-Japaneseism, Marxism, and ecocentrism.
Contrast that with the countries that these proponents of socialism are from, and they're moving in the exact opposite direction: lower-IQ, multiethnic, and atomistic/hyperindividualistic. People, firstly, do not care about, and, secondly, do not trust, each other. There is exceedingly little sense of We-ness; I-ness has largely replaced it. Those are among the reasons that their respective countries are unlike Japan. Japan, of course, is also moving in the same direction, but it will still be several decades before you see the kind of behaviour exhibited in this video seriously decline. I see the same regression in the parts of Asia with which I am more familiar; there, the young are noticeably different, in a bad way, from the old. A few years ago they even started asking students their 'pronouns' in the place with which I am most familiar. Looking at that country more widely, the film industry also betrays how affected they are by these winds of change: LGBT movies are a thing now (as in Japan), but they were not just ten years ago, and drug problems abound.
Scandinavia isn't as worthy of emulation as these people think: Sweden, for instance, has one of the highest rates of antidepressant use in the world.
Thank goodness for a thorough, yet tightly written explanation of social welfare states rather than "Fabian Socialism" spam from a certain someone
Would a woman rather come across a bear or an immigrant man in a forest?
Yes
i've read their literature. they have a culturally ingrained rape fantasy mindset. it's weird.
so now i think that about all countries with over immigration..
Feminists would rather make a “no no square” dance than be called racist by preventing illegals:
https://x.com/johnlefevre/status/1778256432606908803
Context. Guy falls down and drops his money. Everyone around him helps him pick up the money and gives it back to him
Imagine doing this with blacks around. They'd not only grab the money but stomp you to death for fun.
Old rule taught to us during Mardi Gras was to never pick up the chocolate coins off the ground that got missed during a toss.
Because nigger children will literally stomp your fingers broken for fake coins to the hollering and whooping of their clan.
they aren't of us or with us. they need to go back.
I believe it's a deck of cards.
I will also assume they're cards since the Japanese all over the screen at 0:14 says "nande toranpu?" which is something like "why are these cards here?"
He drops cards not money. トランプ (trump card) is what they call them in Japanese.
Well it is less to do with racial homogeneity (same thing might happen in a nice "diverse" neighborhood) and more to do with a lack of low IQ thugs and retards around - which are more prevalent if you mix in certain races.
Somebody was saying something like successful societies look like the clan writ large. In a community small enough where everyone knows each other, you'd expect the neighbors to help because there is accountability. These people will see each other again. What Japan has done successfully is mirror that in a large society. to the point where people are shamed out of society the way they'd be shamed out of a family for bad behavior. I would argue the West lost that feeling, first, or maybe never had it. Even before people were worried about getting mugged by a black thug in LA, they were worried about getting mugged in England somewhere. People were strangers, enough, to attack each other and suppose they'd get away with it on account of anonymity.
I was watching Wardens (Montana), and a warden was following a drifter. I was thinking "this place is safe because you can't survive on your own out here. Though it's vast, such people as are out there know each other as they frequently help each other, which vastly increases the survivability out there."
It's the niggers. It's always the niggers.
Now I'm banned from the donald. Thanks niggers.
Not money. But the point is the same.
When you share a cultural and racial identity, it's harder to harm each other as easier to sympathise and empathise with people.
The problem comes when adding outsiders to this who have been taught to NEVER empathise and always take advantage of them since they are 'weak'
They think if the japanese gave their entire country to blacks right then and there.. the blacks would act the same lol.
That magically.. if whites never existed, blacks and all the other poc (excluding asians since they are white adjacent) would be a utopian society that colonized mars, cured all diseases and evolve into pure energy.
Japan having the US as an ally.. who needs enemies?? Japan got gayer and more culturally enriched.
And this is why UNICEF should be banned, and every org like them, and anyone caught begging for them deserves a sound beating.
UNICEF and Oxfam and Bono caused this.
They deserve a public thrashing in social media, too. DEATH TO UNICEF
Why are some of the titles in Korean?
what are you talking about? its all Japanese.
You can tell none of it is Korean because there aren't any ovals in the runes.
Do you mean Kanji?
I thought I saw circles