It's the red pills fault more women vote dem
(twitter.com)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Might as well have the bars say retarded vs not retarded at this point. I have much more belief that 53% of women in that poll are retards and you’d have to be to genuinely want that bag of bones pedo back in office
It's that welfare is permitted to exist, actually.
Kipling: "When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins..." Women: "OHHHHH MYYYYYY GAAAAWD, THAT SOUNDS LIKE, SO COOL AND STUUUUUF!"
No surprise. Women leaning to the left is pretty standard.
NO NO NO, women were all hard-right anti-abortion conservatives until those DARN RED PILLERS started tweeting "Repeal the 19th"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so mad you made me take a break from posting about how awesome Taylor Swift is!! YARGKALSDJKLSGHSAD~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm going to so burn you boys on my Turning Point USA show.
Signed,
Totally Conservative Woman
Big media has had the “Trump is a rapist” narrative since practically day one way back in 2015/16 with the grab her by the pussy quote, which was of course out of context.
Not to mention Obama has made an open statement about loving pussy and ribs, or the fact that the current sitting “president” has sniffed children in 4k HD and yet most women are too dumb to stop sipping wine while watching the View to question anything. My sister is a big liberal and it’s hard to ever try and talk some sense into her when she defaults back to the same NPC program every single time.
What are they implying here about red pillers and charging money for Twitter, with relation to the poll? Anyone know?
In any case, it seems logical that right leaning women are less likely to use social media, which means they're less likely to vote in an online poll. However, it's been widely known for a while now that women majority vote left, with the one exception being married White women.
The implication is that red piller activity on Twitter was incentivized and turned to engagement farming when Elon started giving out part of the advertising revenue to to large accounts that had Twitter subscriptions. This is at least a little true, but no more than any other ideology, group, or subculture has gained their own engagement farmers hoping to cash in.
The further implication, from that, is that these red pill accounts have driven women away from the right, ergo they are selling out conservatism for money. This is laughably false, as women have leaned heavily left since long before Elon buying Twitter. There would probably be relatively more truth in blaming the leftward leaning of women for red pill philosophy than vice versa.
A small disclaimer, though—while women do lean left relative to men, and we see even here users that like to blame “white women” for the ills of modern liberalism, I do feel it fair to point out that when one accounts for race as well as sex, white women still support Republicans at a higher rate than non-white men.
The problem with this line of thinking is that leftism has come to be defined almost entirely by anti-whiteness. It makes a certain kind of sense for a plurality of non-whites to form political and ideological coalitions in order to outcompete the larger white populations from within their own nations.
What doesn’t make sense:
the sheer number of invading non-whites who are appearing in historically white nations and then immediately agitating against the (currently) majority population through direct representative democracy
the sheer number of whites, and white women in particular, who have been inculcated with dysgenic anti-white ideologies and now agitate for the destruction of their own cultures, nations, and peoples
You expect strife in a multicultural shithole. What you don’t expect is for your country to go from 90% single demographic to a multicultural battlefield in half a century. What you don’t expect is for a third to almost one half of a people to spontaneously develop a suicidal outgroup bias.
These problems were the direct results of specific policy enacted by specific people.
Apparently they think red pillers are paid by twitter or at least make money from their twitter activity.
Not sure what you're seeing that it was an online poll. The poll was by the New York Times.
I mean, red pill influencers do make some money from twitter if they're premium
Ah, OK. So there's that part.
I hate to defer to a logical fallacy but consider the source. It's the New York Times, they have a bias.
The media spent 12 years now making sure Trump's image was as unpalatable to women as possible? Did this guy not notice somehow? That's specifically why they're making such a big deal about Stormy Daniels, etc. that are either nothing-burgers or obviously fabricated.
Women aren't voting based on left or right half the time. They're voting on "everything I've seen of Trump makes him sound like a 'creep,' ew." We all know Biden is quite the creep himself but the media has tried to suppress that at every opportunity while dragging Trump through the mud. The only accusations that weren't simple character assassination were "muh insurection" and "muh classified documents" and neither gained any traction with the public the way a sexual scandal does.
women voting is the problem of our age.
She's a huge Swiftie...though you probably assumed that on your own.
Not an intelligence asset btw.
I'd say I'm surprised at how high the 37% is, but then I remember that there are a large amount of women who are unironically hot for Trump. Like, not just gold diggers but crazy middle aged women dripping for the man.
And physical attractiveness is somewhere around 1/3 to 1/2 of what get women's vote if I recall.
It shouldn't be that surprising. Trump won the white women vote twice, and we still have a few years left where the majority of women will be white.
Conservative woman.
Another one to throw in the pile of reasons women shouldn't vote.
Women post their L's this is not news.
Anyways, yes, red pillers know that women are retarded, evil, self serving cunts. This is again, not news. It's their biology to serve themselves and only themselves. Look at females all across nature. Do they defend their offspring? Sure, to an extent. But naturally, they will abandon their children to live another day as they can simply fuck some more and have more offspring.
Human women are basically the same. I've seen them push children in front of themselves as human shields when given a jump scare at a haunted house. Anything to get away from and protect their own hides from danger.