If I thought it would stop there I wouldn't care too much. But we all know what comes next.
They're already waving that intersectional flag with the black and brown on it, fully importing Western culture war.
If I thought it would stop there I wouldn't care too much.
Yup. As someone who supported gay marriage at the time, I would not do so again, and I would never wish that on Japan or anywhere else. They talk unity, but this is another wedge. This is an attack on not just "sanctity of marriage" or whatever, but society as a whole. No, this is an attack on civilization in fact.
Funny how the list of demands is always the same for every form of degeneracy, and normies still let them get away with accusing their opponents of using the slippery slope fallacy. It isn't a fallacy. It's a fact.
Most states had civil unions that were all but married, in terms of rights and privileges. But: participation is required, so they had to shoehorn something that isn't marriage into the word "marriage" to sanctify it within the new state religion.
It's impossible for gays to marry. Marriage is intrinsically linked to one man and one woman coming together to form a complete human. We're sexually dimorphic. We can only continue the species through marriage, which is why monogamy has been so ardently defended by past peoples and in successful civilizations, to keep the people healthy. Every other variation of coupling, and for any other reason, is larping at best, and more accurately a myriad of the now multitudes of degeneracy, all of which is based on a lie.
It should be noted that in ancient times, a government didn't need to give you a contract to tell you that you were married. The act of sex itself (between a man and a woman) was considered "marriage", and one of the few ways an actually married couple could get a divorce, if one of them cheated (married) with another. Trying to claim that gays can marry is a modern degenerate lie. There are other, far more accurate words, that describe what they do, which is the complete inversion to the meaning, purpose, and virtue of marriage.
It doesn't matter how much you try to capitulate and compromise with evil. They'll always push further. They thrive on your apathy. You can't "I dont care" your way out of the massive hole we're in. That path only leads to a deeper hole. The only way out is with truth.
The problem is there isn't a way to push back on this in Japan at a legislative level so long as the Biden administration and organisations like Blackrock put the thumb on the scales.
If there's a way to drag this out (which given Japanese bureaucracy is actually feasible) to next year and Trump wins, there might be enough time to cut off the pressure that the supreme court can go no as I know it's not popular at all in the majority of Japan, just like the rest of Asia.
Put it this way, he'll accept their support and treat them like everyone else but he won't give them special treatment like this administration.
There's a reason the middle east views Biden as nothing yet were more than willing to do business with Trump, he doesn't force alien ideas into their culture.
I agree it will be a lot different under Trump. We won't have the tax-payer funded globohomos like Rahm Emmanuel pressuring Japan to do this "or else". Problem is the bulk of this evil machine is decentralized and vectored through various NGOs funded by other countries (like Israel, but also Japan itself). The Deep State is International. Trump will switch priorities on what the government supports, and he certainly won't direct the US Embassy in Japan to fly the fag flag, but I'm worried that on this issue he just won't care enough to encourage them to turn things around.
Trump needs to be a culture warrior to make America and Japan great again. If we're lucky, he'll have based advisors who can explain why this is necessary and put the right executive orders on his desk.
Yeah, it’s a choice of someone who tolerates them vs the current regime that glorifies them and the choice is obvious but I’m tired of compromising on shit like this
How long between Japan losing WWII and "their" constitution being written? That time frame sounds about right to me, because they have a constitution that was written by foreigners.
well i think gays should have the right to marry. and if you have a problem with that you're probably jealous you can't gay marry and have to stay in the closet pretending to be straight. and before a smart ass chimes in. i don't care if you are also gay, or bi. people should have the right to marry. your inputs doesn't magically prove the homophobes right. i can easily find some retarded straight dudes, or people on reddit who will agree straight people shouldn't get married. wouldn't prove my point, and a gay or bi alt right person who hates other gay people wouldn't prove your point either.
ah yes standing up for gay rights makes me a troll. hey buddy how has gay people getting married effected you or straight people getting married? i really wanna know.
Even if it was explained to you, You wouldn't understand it anyway. I'll do it anyway, here goes. Gay marriage is an child-trafficking operation. It is also unnatural.
Also unnecessary. They already had all the "rights" before "gay marriage" happened...also, gays by and large don't want to get married anyway. It was all a sham to demoralize (as well as de-moralize) and push toxic ideology.
define rights? also quote me on this one. but in certain states it was legal to either fire or not allow gay people employment. and before this, in 2016 gays legit could not get married in certain states. while yes if you wanna get technical getting married isn't a big deal. i'm bi, but i wanna marry a woman. and i can see the inherent pit falls of marriage... especially for men. so i'm rather on the fence on that.
however. other people, gays included should have the right to get married. regardless of how many of them actually get married. also we all know if 60-70% of gays got married. you'd just move the goal post in that time line to making them all pedos. the small amount that wanna get married is just an excuse you assholes pull to justify taking rights away from other people. also what toxic ideology? and how does that effect straight marriages? with the high fucking divorce rates. and cheating. why are you guys judging gay people so much. when most straight people don't have their! shit together.
Two paragraphs of your low-IQ drivel is at least a paragraph too much. I'm not subjecting my loyal braincells to this so early in the day.
also we all know if 60-70% of gays got married.
I will laugh at this though. HAHAHAHA.
"Gay rights," as with a lot of other communist nonsense, is simply another revenge scheme against normal functioning humans by people who hate us. It's not about compassion, it's about getting one over on us, and plenty of them will tell you as much openly.
i don't understand. by which i mean more straight couples fuck more kids then gay couples do. no gay marriage needed for that. just sounds like homophobic bullshit to me. but feel free to make posts i don't agree with. and i'll keep commenting underneath them, great use of my time.
so the per capita argument you dick heads always bring up magically makes all the groups of people you don't like inherently the bad guys. including non-whites, gays, and women... i'm not gonna be a retard and say per-capita means nothing. but it sure seems like per-capita is largely used for things that align with bigots. again i still have yet to figure out how it works. but i'm just saying.
Why should Japan, who is already facing a birthing crisis, give the diasporic western iteration of homosexuality any kind of a foothold in their culture knowing how virulent and poisonous it tends to be demographically?
Giving homosexuality any kind of societal legitimacy is bad form altogether. They always want more.
If I thought it would stop there I wouldn't care too much. But we all know what comes next. They're already waving that intersectional flag with the black and brown on it, fully importing Western culture war.
Yup. As someone who supported gay marriage at the time, I would not do so again, and I would never wish that on Japan or anywhere else. They talk unity, but this is another wedge. This is an attack on not just "sanctity of marriage" or whatever, but society as a whole. No, this is an attack on civilization in fact.
Tolerance -> acceptance -> celebration -> participation.
Funny how the list of demands is always the same for every form of degeneracy, and normies still let them get away with accusing their opponents of using the slippery slope fallacy. It isn't a fallacy. It's a fact.
Yup. Gay marriage did that to a tee.
Most states had civil unions that were all but married, in terms of rights and privileges. But: participation is required, so they had to shoehorn something that isn't marriage into the word "marriage" to sanctify it within the new state religion.
It's impossible for gays to marry. Marriage is intrinsically linked to one man and one woman coming together to form a complete human. We're sexually dimorphic. We can only continue the species through marriage, which is why monogamy has been so ardently defended by past peoples and in successful civilizations, to keep the people healthy. Every other variation of coupling, and for any other reason, is larping at best, and more accurately a myriad of the now multitudes of degeneracy, all of which is based on a lie.
It should be noted that in ancient times, a government didn't need to give you a contract to tell you that you were married. The act of sex itself (between a man and a woman) was considered "marriage", and one of the few ways an actually married couple could get a divorce, if one of them cheated (married) with another. Trying to claim that gays can marry is a modern degenerate lie. There are other, far more accurate words, that describe what they do, which is the complete inversion to the meaning, purpose, and virtue of marriage.
It doesn't matter how much you try to capitulate and compromise with evil. They'll always push further. They thrive on your apathy. You can't "I dont care" your way out of the massive hole we're in. That path only leads to a deeper hole. The only way out is with truth.
Better words than I could have written and 100% spot on.
The US Supreme Court ruled the income tax was unconstitutional, so they changed the Constitution. Japan do some Constitution change
The problem is there isn't a way to push back on this in Japan at a legislative level so long as the Biden administration and organisations like Blackrock put the thumb on the scales.
If there's a way to drag this out (which given Japanese bureaucracy is actually feasible) to next year and Trump wins, there might be enough time to cut off the pressure that the supreme court can go no as I know it's not popular at all in the majority of Japan, just like the rest of Asia.
Yeah...
Put it this way, he'll accept their support and treat them like everyone else but he won't give them special treatment like this administration.
There's a reason the middle east views Biden as nothing yet were more than willing to do business with Trump, he doesn't force alien ideas into their culture.
I agree it will be a lot different under Trump. We won't have the tax-payer funded globohomos like Rahm Emmanuel pressuring Japan to do this "or else". Problem is the bulk of this evil machine is decentralized and vectored through various NGOs funded by other countries (like Israel, but also Japan itself). The Deep State is International. Trump will switch priorities on what the government supports, and he certainly won't direct the US Embassy in Japan to fly the fag flag, but I'm worried that on this issue he just won't care enough to encourage them to turn things around.
Trump needs to be a culture warrior to make America and Japan great again. If we're lucky, he'll have based advisors who can explain why this is necessary and put the right executive orders on his desk.
Yeah, it’s a choice of someone who tolerates them vs the current regime that glorifies them and the choice is obvious but I’m tired of compromising on shit like this
This is how it starts. Well, this is how the end stages start. If you get to this point, it probably started around sixty or seventy years ago.
How long between Japan losing WWII and "their" constitution being written? That time frame sounds about right to me, because they have a constitution that was written by foreigners.
Let's see if the Supreme Court of Japan is as fucked as the high courts I suppose.
You had a good run, Japan. GG.
Well this is the flashpoint for Japan, let's see if they can tear them down as fast as gay marriage did here in the west.
They got nuclear bombs dropped on them, what is our excuse?
(((Subversion))).
It’s over for them.
Preserve what you can, brothers. This is the floodgate opening, unfortunately.
Sounds like a very 'high' court. Someone get them some downers.
well i think gays should have the right to marry. and if you have a problem with that you're probably jealous you can't gay marry and have to stay in the closet pretending to be straight. and before a smart ass chimes in. i don't care if you are also gay, or bi. people should have the right to marry. your inputs doesn't magically prove the homophobes right. i can easily find some retarded straight dudes, or people on reddit who will agree straight people shouldn't get married. wouldn't prove my point, and a gay or bi alt right person who hates other gay people wouldn't prove your point either.
No one here cares about your opinion.
He's a troll. A very obvious one at that.
He's a troll, but also literally retarded.
ah yes standing up for gay rights makes me a troll. hey buddy how has gay people getting married effected you or straight people getting married? i really wanna know.
Even if it was explained to you, You wouldn't understand it anyway. I'll do it anyway, here goes. Gay marriage is an child-trafficking operation. It is also unnatural.
Also unnecessary. They already had all the "rights" before "gay marriage" happened...also, gays by and large don't want to get married anyway. It was all a sham to demoralize (as well as de-moralize) and push toxic ideology.
define rights? also quote me on this one. but in certain states it was legal to either fire or not allow gay people employment. and before this, in 2016 gays legit could not get married in certain states. while yes if you wanna get technical getting married isn't a big deal. i'm bi, but i wanna marry a woman. and i can see the inherent pit falls of marriage... especially for men. so i'm rather on the fence on that.
however. other people, gays included should have the right to get married. regardless of how many of them actually get married. also we all know if 60-70% of gays got married. you'd just move the goal post in that time line to making them all pedos. the small amount that wanna get married is just an excuse you assholes pull to justify taking rights away from other people. also what toxic ideology? and how does that effect straight marriages? with the high fucking divorce rates. and cheating. why are you guys judging gay people so much. when most straight people don't have their! shit together.
Two paragraphs of your low-IQ drivel is at least a paragraph too much. I'm not subjecting my loyal braincells to this so early in the day.
I will laugh at this though. HAHAHAHA.
"Gay rights," as with a lot of other communist nonsense, is simply another revenge scheme against normal functioning humans by people who hate us. It's not about compassion, it's about getting one over on us, and plenty of them will tell you as much openly.
i don't understand. by which i mean more straight couples fuck more kids then gay couples do. no gay marriage needed for that. just sounds like homophobic bullshit to me. but feel free to make posts i don't agree with. and i'll keep commenting underneath them, great use of my time.
I'd tell you to look up 'per capita' a few hundred more times, but you still wouldn't get it.
Oh, and your ceiling bird says you're retarded.
so the per capita argument you dick heads always bring up magically makes all the groups of people you don't like inherently the bad guys. including non-whites, gays, and women... i'm not gonna be a retard and say per-capita means nothing. but it sure seems like per-capita is largely used for things that align with bigots. again i still have yet to figure out how it works. but i'm just saying.
Go back to preddit.
i will use both this and reddit. i can walk and read at the same time ya know.
Why should Japan, who is already facing a birthing crisis, give the diasporic western iteration of homosexuality any kind of a foothold in their culture knowing how virulent and poisonous it tends to be demographically?
Giving homosexuality any kind of societal legitimacy is bad form altogether. They always want more.
does someone need to care about my opinion for me to state an opinion?
islam is right about degenerates
Beat me to it. Japan is going to have to party like the Taliban.
Are you a nigga? Your iq seems on par with one.