They're just starting to retcon my "coming of age" time of the late 90s/early 00s as horribly oppressive -- which is bullshit* -- so yeah I'd believe they lied about earlier times too.
*They were starting to install metal detectors in the high schools in "poor school districts", so it wasn't all sunshine and roses. But that's not what they mean by "horribly oppressive", because in all the ways normal people would have considered them "horribly oppressive" at the time, today they're even worse.
One instance in all of human history that is contextually reasonable even by today's standards
"Can you believe this was normal treatment of women until nth-wave feminist liberation!!? I should be absolved from any and all responsibility for my actions as recompense to something that never happened to anyone still alive!"
I once found the pant thing idiotic, but with women opening their legs for anything and everything I get the slippery slope that culture was trying to prevent.
Oh well.
After you understand that traditions are experiments that worked, it's easy to see why everything is a progressive dumpster today.
Leftist women believe things like this just like the way black people believe slaves were weaving maps into their hair or that black girls proved the Pythagorean Theorem.
My grandmother (superstitious old country lady) used to try to get me to write right-handed because she thought my left-handedness was a sign that I was possessed by Satan. It really wasn’t traumatic as much as it was annoying, because I couldn’t write right-handed.
What was very traumatic was when the drug dealers / future doctors of America moved in from Major Metropolis a couple hours away and set up satellite operations in my hometown, after which street gangs started showing up in the schools and 12-year me got the fuck beaten out of him in the school hallway by another 12-year-old scholar (white trash variety) who was having a bad acid trip.
From the same people that insist "rule of thumb" refers to being legal to beat a woman with a stick no thicker than your thumb. Anything that confirms their theory that [identity group] is oppressed is factual regardless of how fabricated and anything that doesn't affirm oppression is fabricated regardless of how factual.
They're just starting to retcon my "coming of age" time of the late 90s/early 00s as horribly oppressive -- which is bullshit* -- so yeah I'd believe they lied about earlier times too.
*They were starting to install metal detectors in the high schools in "poor school districts", so it wasn't all sunshine and roses. But that's not what they mean by "horribly oppressive", because in all the ways normal people would have considered them "horribly oppressive" at the time, today they're even worse.
"Can you believe this was normal treatment of women until nth-wave feminist liberation!!? I should be absolved from any and all responsibility for my actions as recompense to something that never happened to anyone still alive!"
Like how "Japan is full of murderous psychopaths because Junko Furuta was killed 35 years ago"?
Yes, they're actually saying this.
They ought be.
I once found the pant thing idiotic, but with women opening their legs for anything and everything I get the slippery slope that culture was trying to prevent.
Oh well.
After you understand that traditions are experiments that worked, it's easy to see why everything is a progressive dumpster today.
There was probably a good reason every civilization in history came to the same conclusion about women's rights until about a century ago.
Good for you, player!!
Slipped right into that one.
Leftist women believe things like this just like the way black people believe slaves were weaving maps into their hair or that black girls proved the Pythagorean Theorem.
My grandmother (superstitious old country lady) used to try to get me to write right-handed because she thought my left-handedness was a sign that I was possessed by Satan. It really wasn’t traumatic as much as it was annoying, because I couldn’t write right-handed.
What was very traumatic was when the drug dealers / future doctors of America moved in from Major Metropolis a couple hours away and set up satellite operations in my hometown, after which street gangs started showing up in the schools and 12-year me got the fuck beaten out of him in the school hallway by another 12-year-old scholar (white trash variety) who was having a bad acid trip.
So, uh, score one against progress.
Why in most of this the father is gay? At best it would be something like 2%, probably less as you did not have to get married.
I think they have a fetish.
They also invent historical fake crimes?
Women clearly need to be given more work and less free time.
based
From the same people that insist "rule of thumb" refers to being legal to beat a woman with a stick no thicker than your thumb. Anything that confirms their theory that [identity group] is oppressed is factual regardless of how fabricated and anything that doesn't affirm oppression is fabricated regardless of how factual.
Both men happen to be the ghey?