What's funny about this is that, unlike nudifying them which might theoretically be losing them value, it literally loses nothing for them.
It only does if they are of the belief that all men should always be jerking off to them and not appreciating them for anything else. So getting pissy about it is in fact them admitting that fact we all knew all along.
While this sounds like a nice idea, I’m not exactly sure how slut shaming confident women is going to help bring dignity back to the internet. Surely a better purpose for this type of AI would be to root out content like child pornography and delete it from the internet forever? Or perhaps me and this AI just have different definitions of the word “dignity.”
Any self-respecting man will immediately dislike an e-thot.
Personally, I don’t care what women wear. If you think a girl is trash because of her skimpy clothes and tattoos, or maybe because she’s cool and smokes Marlboro Reds, then I hope you have the most beautiful life, filled with time and space to worry about stuff that doesn’t hurt anyone.
rofl, e-trash trying to get simp bucks through OnlyFans in the nothing-economy. She's a low-effort prostitute and deserves nothing but contempt.
I also feel like this editorial is a great opportunity to tell everyone who watches me on Newsmax, Joe Pags’ Show, The First etc, and feels the need to email me about my aesthetic: I’m not going to get rid of my nose ring, and I am incredibly proud of my former modeling work. I don’t care if you think I’m unprofessional by most “conservative” standards. By most people’s standards I am an extremely unprofessional person, and I’ve worked really, really hard to be this way.
And there's the clincher. It's about the author not gelling well with conservative inc. costumers.
They're not changing anything, they're just localizing the thot.
An AI that removes tattoos is the best thing since sliced bread.
Seriously, tattoos and weird piercings instantly make any woman ugly.
> Daily Caller
> glorified twitter rant
> REAL NEWS
The Daily Caller?? This sounds like 2014-era Jezebel
What's funny about this is that, unlike nudifying them which might theoretically be losing them value, it literally loses nothing for them.
It only does if they are of the belief that all men should always be jerking off to them and not appreciating them for anything else. So getting pissy about it is in fact them admitting that fact we all knew all along.
Putting their clothes back on gains them value back, and the attack on their narrative is the true reason they are upset.
I can't wait for the DignifAI account to get banned for....putting clothes on Women.
Although it is Musk now so he'll probably retweet it and say "Good job"
Oh my god, I saw that thread the other night. Did that actually take off and make some roasty mad?
so mad that imgur nuked the entire images stock from their website.
tranny janny seething
Well, they say you get flak when you're over the target. Keep going I say.
Hahaha, triggering these idiots was exactly the point behind the AI in the first place. Nice job taking the bait, Daily Caller 😂
This is an even greater op than It's OK to be White.
It's okay to be dressed.
"All your videogame characters are too sexy."
"Real women don't look like that."
"No one can pose that way IRL."
"Beautiful women are unrealistic."
"REEEEEEE NOT LIKE THAT REEEEEE!"
The headline for that article alone just screams soyfag leftist cuck.
I love the "Cover them up, slut" bot.
Any self-respecting man will immediately dislike an e-thot.
rofl, e-trash trying to get simp bucks through OnlyFans in the nothing-economy. She's a low-effort prostitute and deserves nothing but contempt.
And there's the clincher. It's about the author not gelling well with conservative inc. costumers.