Oh yes, that start of the slope of global intersectionalist madness from around 2013 onwards, which preaches eternal female unaccountability, it tracks so clearly from - checks notes - Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes and the reversal of Roe v Wade.
I can't remember who said it but I remember someone saying that the farms have a very feminine energy and they do. You have to be some kind of a woman to sit gossiping for hundreds of pages about a single stranger who doesn't know you, while Null comes off as a histrionic faggot quite often. No surprise he feels a delusional impulse to carry the torch for muh poor women and scapegoat men. Not even scapegoating us for enabling the worst impulses in women - why does a critique of conservative talking points also list the phenomenon of Onlythot simps? As if that's a problem with conservative men - but instead for being too oppressive lol. Rubbish.
Hell I can answer the chart in two words: birth control. Millennial/ gen z women are put on hormone regulators (birth control) as soon as they start ovulating and we wonder why they’re so fucked up?
In other words, you are told you should be a slave and expect nothing in return. Most people would reject this. Most women do not find this an attractive offer. The women that do are lying to your stupid fucking face for money because her name is Pearl Davis and she sucks off homeless black guys.
LMAO, Pearl Davis BTFO
Basically, he took a lot of words to say "White Sharia" is a psyop.
Null has a point that Fresh and Fit style redpills like "high value men can cheat all they want" are dumb. Andrew Tate is ridiculous. But those guys are just the swerve in the other direction when the car starts to slip. Of course they're an overcorrection. The problem is the car was heading into the ditch in the first place.
The problem with this is that its true, but its still bad for society.
Being a sex obsessed degenerate and a massive slut isn't only bad when women do it. And even more importantly, doing something because women (and their infinite beacons of morality and intelligence) approve is massively retarded.
His autistic commitment to keeping KF up and his principles regarding that freedom of speech are more admirable than probably 90% of the people who get called "based."
But him as a person and his other opinions are retarded and no one should take his word seriously in any other avenue besides.
One important bit of context to Jersh's swerve into pro-women is the "Man-hate and Women-hate" threads over the last few months.
Basically he has come to believe women on the internet are massively oppressed by trannies and Leftists, and his site is one of the only bastions where they can be honest and shit on everything without fear. This is because he has an army of simpish ladies whispering in his ear on the site about it. To the point that he thinks the "fat femcels scream about other fatter femcels" portion of the site is the "true KF."
And this made him extremely pissy about anyone hating on women.
Fairly sure the graph has been posted before in some other story and someone summed it up by pointing out the ups and downs followed which party was in charge of the US at the time, so [most] women were as is extremely common following the trend of the time.
Then 2016 happened, Trump screwed up a lot of the narrative, things became even more polarised, and has continued to do so.
Young women are going lib because they're told to by their schoolteachers and by TikTok influencers (I hate when people make perfectly good verbs into nouns). Progressivism so-called also appeals to the maternal instinct--the Earth Mother must take care of her children and set them on the righteous path.
Women only benefit from liberalism's affirmative action programs. They don't benefit from flooding the country with rapists, letting them run loose, and shoving trannies into everything.
Those are just obvious things. It's less concrete, but I don't think women benefit from being dead-egged cat ladies and extreme paranoia about men either. Liberal women are infamously hotbeds of mental illness.
They don't benefit from flooding the country with rapists, letting them run loose, and shoving trannies into everything.
They might not benefit from those things but they're easily swayed by appeals to emotion claiming that it's "inhumane" not to give rapist foreigners and sissy fetishists whatever they want.
I don't think women benefit from being dead-egged cat ladies and extreme paranoia about men either.
They don't benefit from that either, but they choose it over pairing up with a non-Chad while she still has something to offer him every single time. We either force them to behave in a pro-civilization way or we get the clown show that we're currently witnessing. There's no third option.
The West's immigration policies are extremely unpopular, generally speaking. There are a few cases where women support them more than men, but they aren't something that the public demands. They're largely imposed by an elite that is extremely difficult to hold accountable.
Also, I keep hearing how easily manipulated women are from guys who have sperge outs over bullshit random redditards are spewing. Ever think maybe that shit is being fed to you to manipulate you? Nah, it couldn't be!
I was able to spot 3 people calling that post fake from just a brief glance at the first few comment chains. That poster in particular posts a lot of obvious rage bait which just means he's easily manipulated, not that anyone who questions the "women are wonderful" narrative is easily manipulated.
Force them to do what exactly and how?
Not spend their youth whoring around and expecting some chump to pay for it once they've hit the wall. Their insistence on doing that is what causes them to become "dead-egged cat ladies". There are a number of ways we could accomplish that, but something that would be relatively uncontroversial on the right would be the reintroduction of conservative sexual mores and cutting off welfare for single mothers. None of that will ever happen of course, but that's why things won't ever get better.
He usually gets tons of agreement and commiseration. That linked post is at +72 despite being a deceptively edited screenshot of a reddit post from years ago. I never said "women are wonderful." I disputed the poster who said that the liberals are correct, that women are better off with them.
Whoring around with whom? 45% of men have never approached a woman in person. It looks to me like women and their MGTARD counterparts sit on the internet all day whining about how the worst thing they could possibly do is log off and actually experience life.
Single women are overwhelmingly liberal. Married women are overwhelmingly conservative. Women want men that make equal if not more that they do. Ergo, make it so men are flourishing in the job market over long-term and you get a bunch of married women.
Granted, this is the very definition of the phrase 'Easy to say, very hard to do...'
Those are just obvious things. It's less concrete, but I don't think women benefit from being dead-egged cat ladies and extreme paranoia about men either. Liberal women are infamously hotbeds of mental illness.
All Women know Sex and the City, but no Women know that the creator of the show, Candace Bushnell is now sad and alone and regrets her girlboss life. Because they will never make a show about that.
Funnily enough, I bet women actually benefit more from conservatism. Think about how happy women were back in the day when they didn't have to work soulless jobs all day.
Oh yes, that start of the slope of global intersectionalist madness from around 2013 onwards, which preaches eternal female unaccountability, it tracks so clearly from - checks notes - Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes and the reversal of Roe v Wade.
I can't remember who said it but I remember someone saying that the farms have a very feminine energy and they do. You have to be some kind of a woman to sit gossiping for hundreds of pages about a single stranger who doesn't know you, while Null comes off as a histrionic faggot quite often. No surprise he feels a delusional impulse to carry the torch for muh poor women and scapegoat men. Not even scapegoating us for enabling the worst impulses in women - why does a critique of conservative talking points also list the phenomenon of Onlythot simps? As if that's a problem with conservative men - but instead for being too oppressive lol. Rubbish.
Hell I can answer the chart in two words: birth control. Millennial/ gen z women are put on hormone regulators (birth control) as soon as they start ovulating and we wonder why they’re so fucked up?
LMAO, Pearl Davis BTFO
Basically, he took a lot of words to say "White Sharia" is a psyop.
I can hear Imp cackling with glee as his anti-natalist dreams of the death of the white race come closer to fruition.
Null has a point that Fresh and Fit style redpills like "high value men can cheat all they want" are dumb. Andrew Tate is ridiculous. But those guys are just the swerve in the other direction when the car starts to slip. Of course they're an overcorrection. The problem is the car was heading into the ditch in the first place.
The problem with this is that its true, but its still bad for society.
Being a sex obsessed degenerate and a massive slut isn't only bad when women do it. And even more importantly, doing something because women (and their infinite beacons of morality and intelligence) approve is massively retarded.
His autistic commitment to keeping KF up and his principles regarding that freedom of speech are more admirable than probably 90% of the people who get called "based."
But him as a person and his other opinions are retarded and no one should take his word seriously in any other avenue besides.
Based and cheesepilled.
Is there a single internet personality who WASN'T some kind of degenerate goon freak in a past life?
Jerma985, although the trannies are trying really hard to change that.
One important bit of context to Jersh's swerve into pro-women is the "Man-hate and Women-hate" threads over the last few months.
Basically he has come to believe women on the internet are massively oppressed by trannies and Leftists, and his site is one of the only bastions where they can be honest and shit on everything without fear. This is because he has an army of simpish ladies whispering in his ear on the site about it. To the point that he thinks the "fat femcels scream about other fatter femcels" portion of the site is the "true KF."
And this made him extremely pissy about anyone hating on women.
Fairly sure the graph has been posted before in some other story and someone summed it up by pointing out the ups and downs followed which party was in charge of the US at the time, so [most] women were as is extremely common following the trend of the time.
Then 2016 happened, Trump screwed up a lot of the narrative, things became even more polarised, and has continued to do so.
Are you sure it was them? Are you sure it wasn't a never ending clown car of awful, sour, entitled women?
Jersh has always been a simp when it comes to the ladies. He was raised by a single mother after all.
Who dis?
Joshua Moon, AKA "Null", owner and head administrator of Kiwi Farms.
Young women are going lib because they're told to by their schoolteachers and by TikTok influencers (I hate when people make perfectly good verbs into nouns). Progressivism so-called also appeals to the maternal instinct--the Earth Mother must take care of her children and set them on the righteous path.
Enough to make a man spew.
Josh must have a new feminist dicktrap
I thought after all he had been through he would be pretty based?
He’s really based like, a third of the time.
Women only benefit from liberalism's affirmative action programs. They don't benefit from flooding the country with rapists, letting them run loose, and shoving trannies into everything.
Those are just obvious things. It's less concrete, but I don't think women benefit from being dead-egged cat ladies and extreme paranoia about men either. Liberal women are infamously hotbeds of mental illness.
Also, how would you force women to do anything?
They might not benefit from those things but they're easily swayed by appeals to emotion claiming that it's "inhumane" not to give rapist foreigners and sissy fetishists whatever they want.
They don't benefit from that either, but they choose it over pairing up with a non-Chad while she still has something to offer him every single time. We either force them to behave in a pro-civilization way or we get the clown show that we're currently witnessing. There's no third option.
The West's immigration policies are extremely unpopular, generally speaking. There are a few cases where women support them more than men, but they aren't something that the public demands. They're largely imposed by an elite that is extremely difficult to hold accountable.
Also, I keep hearing how easily manipulated women are from guys who have sperge outs over bullshit random redditards are spewing. Ever think maybe that shit is being fed to you to manipulate you? Nah, it couldn't be!
Force them to do what exactly and how?
I was able to spot 3 people calling that post fake from just a brief glance at the first few comment chains. That poster in particular posts a lot of obvious rage bait which just means he's easily manipulated, not that anyone who questions the "women are wonderful" narrative is easily manipulated.
Not spend their youth whoring around and expecting some chump to pay for it once they've hit the wall. Their insistence on doing that is what causes them to become "dead-egged cat ladies". There are a number of ways we could accomplish that, but something that would be relatively uncontroversial on the right would be the reintroduction of conservative sexual mores and cutting off welfare for single mothers. None of that will ever happen of course, but that's why things won't ever get better.
He usually gets tons of agreement and commiseration. That linked post is at +72 despite being a deceptively edited screenshot of a reddit post from years ago. I never said "women are wonderful." I disputed the poster who said that the liberals are correct, that women are better off with them.
Whoring around with whom? 45% of men have never approached a woman in person. It looks to me like women and their MGTARD counterparts sit on the internet all day whining about how the worst thing they could possibly do is log off and actually experience life.
You.. really don't have a concept of modern sexual dynamics do you....
Enlighten me. Your pal up there is a Jew shill, by the way.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17sOZeozJN/i-think-the-radfems-on-kiwi-farm/c/4Z8inKLvWtM
Make men rich.
Single women are overwhelmingly liberal. Married women are overwhelmingly conservative. Women want men that make equal if not more that they do. Ergo, make it so men are flourishing in the job market over long-term and you get a bunch of married women.
Granted, this is the very definition of the phrase 'Easy to say, very hard to do...'
That would actually be very easy to accomplish. All you have to do is let reality do its job.
Nobody is letting reality do its job these days.
All Women know Sex and the City, but no Women know that the creator of the show, Candace Bushnell is now sad and alone and regrets her girlboss life. Because they will never make a show about that.
White women overwhelmingly prefer White men. White men actually race mix more. There goes that ridiculous theory.
It's also from dating app stats.
Dating apps are used for casual sex all the time.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 & Rule 16
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 & Rule 16
Funnily enough, I bet women actually benefit more from conservatism. Think about how happy women were back in the day when they didn't have to work soulless jobs all day.