https://youtu.be/jQ6vU3gvrrY?feature=shared
First of all, she has no evidence that anything she's saying is correct. Instead everything was told to her by a "source" whom she trusts implicitly but we have no idea who this is. And frankly if all you're going to do is just repeat what a source tells you and take it as fact, wtf did it take 8 mths to do so??
Lots of speculation, nothing useful at all, speculating she was angry cause people werent embracing her new gender as well as she wanted, speculation she was abused as a child. But no EVIDENCE.
I watch this so you don't have to because its so bad especially when she made it seem like she had some super duper scoop yesterday while dunking on Crowder for only releasing 3 pages. But 3 pages is better than no pages and just speculating
I can't imagine why anyone trusts her. She's a grifter, always has been.
Before anyone knew she existed, she originally wanted every negative thing you said next to your online name, and your real name on a website so everyone could see.
The older I get the more I realize no one changes.
People who don't actively desire to be anonymous on the internet have absolutely no business having access to it.
This, friend. The current Internet is more like France 1942 than the Wild West of the Internet of old, and anyone who uses their real name to say anything anyways controversial in any form is begging for Red Guards 2.0 to sift through their past to find any tiny nugget of offense.
I prefer my Offense Nuggets in dinosaur shapes.
Too bad
Or like America 1939. Except this time if you oppose war on Iran or war on Russia, they'll shut you down like Father Coughlin.
Jordan Peterson also hates internet anonymity and works for the Daily Wire. It seems to be a running theme there.
Go get em man, Good luck to you.
His point of view is understandable because he's a brain damaged man who has been relentlessly tormented by anonymous communists for years. It's short sighted but you can draw a coherent line from cause to effect.
not only that, she wanted this to be based on screenshots, because we all know screenshots can never be faked.
Yeah, the whole thing never sat right with me. Like, something of that magnitude should have been a red flag even to it's creator.
But she was okay with it and wanted to see it happen.
It was never a good idea.
Who gets to determine what is good and what is bad? How far removed from hurt feelings does something have to be before it's bad? Is it just that you don't like what was said so you can keep a record of it online against someone?
Too many questions, not nearly enough answers. 100% badly planned poorly thought out idea.
I wish more people on this forum actually did realize that...
Yeah, I don't remember the name of the site, but it was talked about a lot on the sub reddit (I'm pretty sure, I'm not sure this existed back then, but maybe both did). Social autopsy or something?
She was, and still is, a grifter.
Social Autopsy.
I think you're right about the website name. If that's not it, it was something really close to it.
It was so bad even Zoe Quinn was against her.
DW literally taking ZQ rejects.
Republicans are just as into identity politics as Democrats. They're so desperate to prop up a black wammin
Yes, political parties are more teams than ideologies. Republicans are desperate to remain relevant as white people are replaced.
Republicans need a new base. White people need a new party. Let's do this.
Thankyou. I wasn't going to watch it. Crowder got his issues too but I trust him over Owens any day. This is sour grapes because he beat them to the punch
Is this also a bit of a tell on who pulls the purse strings of DW? Toothless, day late dollar short coverage they could have run for months now, really?
I was curious to see what she had since she talked it up so damn much and talked about how important it was to have the full picture instead of just 3 pages. Bitch didn't even have 1 page.
The Crowder leaks make sense because that is exactly what would be suppressed nowadays
Libtard grifter says what?
DW said they had some kind of court case over this that was probaby going nowhere (by design). They could milk it for attention and thr govt could keep it from us. A win win for the grift all around
Even as a neo-con/libtard grifter, she isn’t worth a cent without Crowder.
"Speculation" is that wonderful land where Personal Biasbeasts roam freely for all to see.
It's kind of why speculation threads can be the worst, sometimes. Especially game/DLC speculations, where, after release, peoples' various pet biasbeasts are nowhere to be found, and so the calls of "it sucks, it sucks, it sucks" reverberates across the land as their owners try to call them out ...
Full of shit- check, trying to steal the spotlight- check, looks my prediction was correct