https://youtu.be/jQ6vU3gvrrY?feature=shared
First of all, she has no evidence that anything she's saying is correct. Instead everything was told to her by a "source" whom she trusts implicitly but we have no idea who this is. And frankly if all you're going to do is just repeat what a source tells you and take it as fact, wtf did it take 8 mths to do so??
Lots of speculation, nothing useful at all, speculating she was angry cause people werent embracing her new gender as well as she wanted, speculation she was abused as a child. But no EVIDENCE.
I watch this so you don't have to because its so bad especially when she made it seem like she had some super duper scoop yesterday while dunking on Crowder for only releasing 3 pages. But 3 pages is better than no pages and just speculating
not only that, she wanted this to be based on screenshots, because we all know screenshots can never be faked.
Yeah, the whole thing never sat right with me. Like, something of that magnitude should have been a red flag even to it's creator.
But she was okay with it and wanted to see it happen.
It was never a good idea.
Who gets to determine what is good and what is bad? How far removed from hurt feelings does something have to be before it's bad? Is it just that you don't like what was said so you can keep a record of it online against someone?
Too many questions, not nearly enough answers. 100% badly planned poorly thought out idea.
I wish more people on this forum actually did realize that...