No other kids jeering or chimping out in the background during drama? There's just the 4 of them in that room + cameraman, for an alleged presentation lesson. That ain't exactly a standard class size.
Plus it's hard to tell but that "teacher" could easily be anywhere between 16-30 by the looks of her.
Yeah, right? I mean there's plenty of places where she would be in the extreme minority with that BS, but you know there'd be one or two in a full class going full batshit crazy.
I'm guessing summer school for 'tards so they can advance to the next grade.
That's why there's only a few kids in class and why the teacher has the balls; if "they" throw down and she fails them by the time it gets resolved even in their favor they'll be held back.
When drama happened in my HS, a lot of kids would just freeze and soak it all up. Maybe everybody else is pulling out their phone. It did seem a little quiet, idk.
edit: the guy on the right that pops up seems a little grown for K-12 lol. I don't know guys
This looks staged but assuming it isn’t I think that is good for delusional people to be told the truth When my grandmother had dementia we certainly didn’t tell her that the people she kept seeing or voices she heard were real
Well after she gets fired she needs to pull the race card aggressively. I think that either this woman has too much integrity to even to go there, or it's all faked though.
I have to say that I think that pulling the race card on wokies is justified. I've gotten some real gems that way, including a moderator for a far-left sub who once called me a 'Nazi of color'.
Could be they are in one of the states where the federal government has an injunction against them denying the enforcement of pronouns by stealing lunch funding for failure to clownworld.
Follow the golden rule. It is disrespectful to demand respect while giving none. The student cannot demand the teacher use the student's language without the teacher demanding the same in return.
Or just ask them if they are aware that they will someday go out into the world and meet people who are not 100% compatible with them. What is their plan to cope with it? Because if you cannot cope, you can find yourself fired.
The teacher is Southern, but the student is not. Educated black women are incredibly bossy and conservative, which is why you only hear about educated black women from the North and Rachel Dolezal.
Sadly, we all know how this is going to end: with the teacher fired after she is forced by the union to make a public apology to MISS Parker, her family, and all the other alphabet people she offended at the school. Maybe she'll face a little lenience due to being a black woman, but leftists are very unforgiving to any that stray too far off the plantation. Unless she's a hardcore black supremacist as well; then she might get some serious protection from the other supremacy groups she can get in contact with. Then we might enjoy ourselves a little civil war.
I'll never get why people apologize without a guarantee that they will keep their job.
Nobody believes they're actually sorry, we all know they're just doing it in the hopes of not being fired, but given the chance that they'll just fire you anyway and now you lost a bunch of face for apologizing, I would ask for a written guarantee that I keep my job as a condition of me issuing an apology.
I'll never get why people apologize without a guarantee that they will keep their job.
I'm guessing it works something like this: well, Triangle, you really dun messed up. I really want to help you, but you need to give me something to work with. If you apologize, then that would really help. Consider it.
Most people, when putting an apology vs. their livelihoods in the scale, and having others to care for, don't mind apologizing that much - especially since they do not have the experience we have, with nearly a decade of apologies being seen as ad admission of guilt.
I would ask for a written guarantee that I keep my job as a condition of me issuing an apology.
No authority is ever going to provide something like that. The only way to stop this sort of thing is to have some serious employee protections, but that has some drawbacks in the American context. I have seen very few social media witch hunts against ordinary people in countries without at will employment, simply because the mobs know that companies aren't permitted to fire people for something like this, so they don't even bother asking for it.
No authority is ever going to provide something like that.
Apologizing is admitting fault, that's removing the culpability from the company and allowing them to push it squarely on you. Otherwise the amount of paperwork, bureaucracy and payouts if the situation calls for it is absurd.
That's why every company asks for a "statement" for anything possible. They are fishing for reasons to absolve themselves.
As such, they desperately want you to apologize so they can wipe their hands of it and throw it at your feet. You have more power than you think by simply holding out, they just want you to think their authority is so absolute that you aren't.
No authority is ever going to provide something like that.
I don't know, part of the reason they want the employee to issue the apology this is the employee helps immunize the institution from liability by stating that they acted outside of policy and custom.
There's definitely some negotiating room there e.g. "I'll agree to take the fall and say this is entirely my own misbehavior and in no way reflects company policy, then you can send me to some sensitivity training and I go back to work."
The alternative being: "I'm not apologizing and when you fire me I will agree to testify on behalf of the plaintiff and tell everyone that I felt empowered by the toxic culture that you foster here. In fact my management routinely said racist and made anti-lgbtxyzabc comments to me behind closed doors. Imagine the faces of the jury when I tell them that the principal said he wishes all these faggot kids would just die."
I've worked at jobs where we kept people around simply because it was hard to fire them. We had a girl fucking one of management in the office after hours with sex toys and kept her on in exchange for her rolling over on the manager and providing the statements needed to fire him. Not this exact circumstance, but if you can make the organization feel that they are putting themselves at risk for firing you, they'll take the path of least resistance.
Something seems off about it but who knows
No other kids jeering or chimping out in the background during drama? There's just the 4 of them in that room + cameraman, for an alleged presentation lesson. That ain't exactly a standard class size.
Plus it's hard to tell but that "teacher" could easily be anywhere between 16-30 by the looks of her.
Yeah, right? I mean there's plenty of places where she would be in the extreme minority with that BS, but you know there'd be one or two in a full class going full batshit crazy.
I'm guessing summer school for 'tards so they can advance to the next grade.
That's why there's only a few kids in class and why the teacher has the balls; if "they" throw down and she fails them by the time it gets resolved even in their favor they'll be held back.
When drama happened in my HS, a lot of kids would just freeze and soak it all up. Maybe everybody else is pulling out their phone. It did seem a little quiet, idk.
edit: the guy on the right that pops up seems a little grown for K-12 lol. I don't know guys
Well, you're not going crazy yet, community notes seems to show they are indeed a skit group doing staged bits.
Hope it's real.
This looks staged but assuming it isn’t I think that is good for delusional people to be told the truth When my grandmother had dementia we certainly didn’t tell her that the people she kept seeing or voices she heard were real
Well after she gets fired she needs to pull the race card aggressively. I think that either this woman has too much integrity to even to go there, or it's all faked though.
I have to say that I think that pulling the race card on wokies is justified. I've gotten some real gems that way, including a moderator for a far-left sub who once called me a 'Nazi of color'.
Could be they are in one of the states where the federal government has an injunction against them denying the enforcement of pronouns by stealing lunch funding for failure to clownworld.
Follow the golden rule. It is disrespectful to demand respect while giving none. The student cannot demand the teacher use the student's language without the teacher demanding the same in return.
Or just ask them if they are aware that they will someday go out into the world and meet people who are not 100% compatible with them. What is their plan to cope with it? Because if you cannot cope, you can find yourself fired.
Missouri Court Says It’s Okay to Call a Gay Employee 'Cocksucker' and Ask If He Has AIDS
I think that I would like your parents.
If it's real, it's a role of the dice if black female card has more credit than the pronoun card.
Black female might just win it because I think people are more tired ofbthis 'I'm special' shit
You saying roll of the dice makes me think a DND style game with the oppression hierarchy might be fun. I’ll be the DM
Make a Will save against alt-right indoctrination! Remember to adjust the roll for them dead naming you and not respecting your preferred pronouns.
The teacher is Southern, but the student is not. Educated black women are incredibly bossy and conservative, which is why you only hear about educated black women from the North and Rachel Dolezal.
Accurate and I would add they tend towards fundamentalist conservative.
nice!
Community notes to the rescue, it appears to be staged.
The problems in this country could be solved by really hard kicks to the ass.
Sadly, we all know how this is going to end: with the teacher fired after she is forced by the union to make a public apology to MISS Parker, her family, and all the other alphabet people she offended at the school. Maybe she'll face a little lenience due to being a black woman, but leftists are very unforgiving to any that stray too far off the plantation. Unless she's a hardcore black supremacist as well; then she might get some serious protection from the other supremacy groups she can get in contact with. Then we might enjoy ourselves a little civil war.
I'll never get why people apologize without a guarantee that they will keep their job.
Nobody believes they're actually sorry, we all know they're just doing it in the hopes of not being fired, but given the chance that they'll just fire you anyway and now you lost a bunch of face for apologizing, I would ask for a written guarantee that I keep my job as a condition of me issuing an apology.
I'm guessing it works something like this: well, Triangle, you really dun messed up. I really want to help you, but you need to give me something to work with. If you apologize, then that would really help. Consider it.
Most people, when putting an apology vs. their livelihoods in the scale, and having others to care for, don't mind apologizing that much - especially since they do not have the experience we have, with nearly a decade of apologies being seen as ad admission of guilt.
No authority is ever going to provide something like that. The only way to stop this sort of thing is to have some serious employee protections, but that has some drawbacks in the American context. I have seen very few social media witch hunts against ordinary people in countries without at will employment, simply because the mobs know that companies aren't permitted to fire people for something like this, so they don't even bother asking for it.
Apologizing is admitting fault, that's removing the culpability from the company and allowing them to push it squarely on you. Otherwise the amount of paperwork, bureaucracy and payouts if the situation calls for it is absurd.
That's why every company asks for a "statement" for anything possible. They are fishing for reasons to absolve themselves.
As such, they desperately want you to apologize so they can wipe their hands of it and throw it at your feet. You have more power than you think by simply holding out, they just want you to think their authority is so absolute that you aren't.
I don't know, part of the reason they want the employee to issue the apology this is the employee helps immunize the institution from liability by stating that they acted outside of policy and custom.
There's definitely some negotiating room there e.g. "I'll agree to take the fall and say this is entirely my own misbehavior and in no way reflects company policy, then you can send me to some sensitivity training and I go back to work."
The alternative being: "I'm not apologizing and when you fire me I will agree to testify on behalf of the plaintiff and tell everyone that I felt empowered by the toxic culture that you foster here. In fact my management routinely said racist and made anti-lgbtxyzabc comments to me behind closed doors. Imagine the faces of the jury when I tell them that the principal said he wishes all these faggot kids would just die."
I've worked at jobs where we kept people around simply because it was hard to fire them. We had a girl fucking one of management in the office after hours with sex toys and kept her on in exchange for her rolling over on the manager and providing the statements needed to fire him. Not this exact circumstance, but if you can make the organization feel that they are putting themselves at risk for firing you, they'll take the path of least resistance.