Leftists have created a control grid in which they are empowered to declare 1) all of your innocuous statements are coded dog whistles intended to promote metaphysical evil while 2) all of their overtly evil statements are ironic and hyperbolic satire intended to promote unassailable good.
Pretty easy to win debates when you give yourself the power to redefine all of your opponents’ arguments as de facto wrong and all of your own arguments as de facto correct. Your violence is speech, their speech is violence, etc.
This systematic destruction of language, discourse, and debate is the true origin of the helicopter meme, btw. When your enemy deliberately grenades the very concept of discussion, you’re not left with many options.
Yeah the identifying as a helicopter is less outrageous than what many mentally ill girls on tumblr were doing at the time. At least physically a helicopter can be an extension of who you are, instead of "identifying" as a star, fairy, or group of fictional characters.
This is also the reason they push "Latinx" too, it's an attempt at complete destruction of the romance languages. Being gendered is inherent to their existence, and removing that basically undermines them entirely.
NYT is literally named after the duke of york, the most prolific slave trader in the history of all of the americas.
This is actually hilarious. We see where the line is drawn for renaming things that were named for slave owners/ traffickers/etc. Schools, parks, animal species, YES, states, NO, too much trouble. What would all those douchey blue haired liberals who brag about being “New Yorkers” within seven minutes of moving there think if they knew they were citing some white devil slavemaster?!?
we need to meme this into reality. make some white supremacist posts worshiping the duke of york, and how everyone needs to move to new york to promote slavery. and then some posts about lefties getting their panties in a bunch and how the state needs to be renamed and everything with "york" in the name along with it.
they could even call it new ketanji, named after the black doesnt-know-what-a-woman-is who was admitted to the supreme court. or name it new obama, not after barack, but about his black tranny "wife".
A jew who isn't Jewish isn't a jew. He's typically a Leftist pretending to be a jew. The core element to a jew is his Judaism. It is his culture, his language, his history, his religion, his family, his friends, his community, his home, and his... uh, well, tradition.
Britain is a political entity that is comprised of 4 kingdoms, one of which is England. An englishman is necessarily British, and that is because England is part of Britain, and an englishman's culture, language, history, religion, family, friends, community, home, and traditions are English (which are thus British).
A non-English Englishman doesn't exist. A man living in England, who is a Pakistani Muslim, who opposes the existence of England, demands the construction of an Islamic Caliphate, doesn't speak English, doesn't interact outside his Islamist community, can not be English.
Removing the core element that defines the object is to remove the definition of the thing itself.
White on the other had, like all racial constructs, is a wildly broad construct defined almost entirely within a political sphere. It has no shared religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or even geography. While biological substrata exist ("Biological Race" if you will), these don't define the religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or geography.
You can have a white englishman. You can have a white jew. You can have a black englishman. You can have a black jew. You can't have a russian englishman, nor an athiest jew.
A jew who isn't Jewish isn't a jew. He's typically a Leftist pretending to be a jew.
So "white people suck, but I'm not white, I'm Jewish" bigots are actually white and not Jewish?
Can you go argue with them about that instead of mincing words about it here?
For the record, I don't care what those types call themselves or what anyone else calls them. Leftist subversive works fine. But until "it's not ok to lump all white people into a category of evil oppressors" is as culturally enforced as "it's not ok to lump all Jewish people into a category of evil oppressors," I'm not going to be terribly bothered when the gander gets the goose's sauce. We're marching down the path to another round of ethnic genocides and if I'm forced to pick a side in this stupid game, I'm going with the one that doesn't hate me and I'm not going to feel guilty about it.
So "white people suck, but I'm not white, I'm Jewish" bigots are actually white and not Jewish? Can you go argue with them about that instead of mincing words about it here?
They're typically Leftists. However, they aren't here. I am here, and thus my opinions are here too. If they do, one day, show up, you can see me argue with them. Something along the lines of "It's not that you're not a real jew; it's that you're not a jew at all, you're just a globalist Leftist that belongs nowhere, and has no people, and doesn't deserve any."
Leftists can culturally enforce whatever they want, and I intend to shove it back in their face: like using "jew" as a shield.
Our obvious jokes are sincere death threats, their sincere death threats are jokes. Until our guys have power and can punish these people, they'll just keep radicalizing and doing the same shit.
Well it is The New York Times. A black serial killer could hold them hostage and kill some of the staff and afterwards they would write a glowing review about him
I once saw a Facebook comment where a guy said “I hate white people” and then went into a three-paragraph explanation of “Obviously, I don’t mean ALL white peoples, just the ones that…” But I figure if your clarification is more than two times longer than the initial statement, you might as well come up with a better and more (allegedly) “accurate” initial statement that conveys what you say your real point is. Otherwise you’re playing the motte and bailey game which apart from being fallacious is also incredibly cowardly.
Leftists have created a control grid in which they are empowered to declare 1) all of your innocuous statements are coded dog whistles intended to promote metaphysical evil while 2) all of their overtly evil statements are ironic and hyperbolic satire intended to promote unassailable good.
Pretty easy to win debates when you give yourself the power to redefine all of your opponents’ arguments as de facto wrong and all of your own arguments as de facto correct. Your violence is speech, their speech is violence, etc.
This systematic destruction of language, discourse, and debate is the true origin of the helicopter meme, btw. When your enemy deliberately grenades the very concept of discussion, you’re not left with many options.
Yeah the identifying as a helicopter is less outrageous than what many mentally ill girls on tumblr were doing at the time. At least physically a helicopter can be an extension of who you are, instead of "identifying" as a star, fairy, or group of fictional characters.
This is also the reason they push "Latinx" too, it's an attempt at complete destruction of the romance languages. Being gendered is inherent to their existence, and removing that basically undermines them entirely.
I highly suggest people check out Websters first 1828 dictionary to compare how definitions have changed in 200 years.
Lol you guys are talking about two different memes. Attack helicopter = tranny meme. Helicopter = throwing commies out of helicopters.
Helicopters are a meme only because they're less economically efficient than walling off the cities and waiting for the inevitable.
If only we had a historical track record of the NYT downplaying genocide!
NYT's founder got his big break writing that northern slave owners should be allowed to hunt freed black slaves for sport.
NYT is literally named after the duke of york, the most prolific slave trader in the history of all of the americas.
now they're trying to wash that all away by supporting cosmic racial revenge, as long as it's aimed at non-jevvish whites.
This is actually hilarious. We see where the line is drawn for renaming things that were named for slave owners/ traffickers/etc. Schools, parks, animal species, YES, states, NO, too much trouble. What would all those douchey blue haired liberals who brag about being “New Yorkers” within seven minutes of moving there think if they knew they were citing some white devil slavemaster?!?
we need to meme this into reality. make some white supremacist posts worshiping the duke of york, and how everyone needs to move to new york to promote slavery. and then some posts about lefties getting their panties in a bunch and how the state needs to be renamed and everything with "york" in the name along with it.
they could even call it new ketanji, named after the black doesnt-know-what-a-woman-is who was admitted to the supreme court. or name it new obama, not after barack, but about his black tranny "wife".
it's shrodinger's jevv.
say they're not white, and suddenly you're getting cancelled for being a member of the KKK.
say they are white, and suddenly you're getting cancelled like whoopi goldberg.
really what it is, is that you're not allowed to talk about them at all unless it's "approved speech".
There are white jews as assuredly as there are white muslims.
Religions and ethnicities are different.
You can be British and not English, and vice versa.
You can be a Jew and not Jewish, same as.
Those aren't anything like each other.
A jew who isn't Jewish isn't a jew. He's typically a Leftist pretending to be a jew. The core element to a jew is his Judaism. It is his culture, his language, his history, his religion, his family, his friends, his community, his home, and his... uh, well, tradition.
Britain is a political entity that is comprised of 4 kingdoms, one of which is England. An englishman is necessarily British, and that is because England is part of Britain, and an englishman's culture, language, history, religion, family, friends, community, home, and traditions are English (which are thus British).
A non-English Englishman doesn't exist. A man living in England, who is a Pakistani Muslim, who opposes the existence of England, demands the construction of an Islamic Caliphate, doesn't speak English, doesn't interact outside his Islamist community, can not be English.
Being English is core to being an englishman.
Being Jewish is core to being a jew.
Removing the core element that defines the object is to remove the definition of the thing itself.
White on the other had, like all racial constructs, is a wildly broad construct defined almost entirely within a political sphere. It has no shared religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or even geography. While biological substrata exist ("Biological Race" if you will), these don't define the religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or geography.
You can have a white englishman. You can have a white jew. You can have a black englishman. You can have a black jew. You can't have a russian englishman, nor an athiest jew.
So "white people suck, but I'm not white, I'm Jewish" bigots are actually white and not Jewish?
Can you go argue with them about that instead of mincing words about it here?
For the record, I don't care what those types call themselves or what anyone else calls them. Leftist subversive works fine. But until "it's not ok to lump all white people into a category of evil oppressors" is as culturally enforced as "it's not ok to lump all Jewish people into a category of evil oppressors," I'm not going to be terribly bothered when the gander gets the goose's sauce. We're marching down the path to another round of ethnic genocides and if I'm forced to pick a side in this stupid game, I'm going with the one that doesn't hate me and I'm not going to feel guilty about it.
They're typically Leftists. However, they aren't here. I am here, and thus my opinions are here too. If they do, one day, show up, you can see me argue with them. Something along the lines of "It's not that you're not a real jew; it's that you're not a jew at all, you're just a globalist Leftist that belongs nowhere, and has no people, and doesn't deserve any."
Leftists can culturally enforce whatever they want, and I intend to shove it back in their face: like using "jew" as a shield.
There are white jews, as there are black jews, as there are arab jews. Judaism is a religion.
White jews are real, and pre-date Christianity. Even the Romans knew this.
They also denied the Holodomor, spread explicit Soviet Propaganda, and rationalized that Hitler had been reformed in Jail.
Didn't they cover up Nazi crimes during World War II as well?
I think they claimed Poland attacked Germany not sure about the war crimes part
Our obvious jokes are sincere death threats, their sincere death threats are jokes. Until our guys have power and can punish these people, they'll just keep radicalizing and doing the same shit.
It was always an anti-white chant. Specifically: an anti-Boer chant, which is why they are calling to kill them.
The "political leader" is a genocidal maniac, and a Black National Socialist.
The """""historians"""""" are lying. I can read what words mean.
https://media.communities.win/post/hHQ80n2Ttyti.png
Tweet from Julius Malema, the leader of the group in South Africa known for chanting "kill the boer (Whites), kill the White farmer"
Text:
Capitalization not mine.
Well it is The New York Times. A black serial killer could hold them hostage and kill some of the staff and afterwards they would write a glowing review about him
I once saw a Facebook comment where a guy said “I hate white people” and then went into a three-paragraph explanation of “Obviously, I don’t mean ALL white peoples, just the ones that…” But I figure if your clarification is more than two times longer than the initial statement, you might as well come up with a better and more (allegedly) “accurate” initial statement that conveys what you say your real point is. Otherwise you’re playing the motte and bailey game which apart from being fallacious is also incredibly cowardly.
Already posted: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16c1ujJHd9/
Whites are facing more racism than anything seen in 1920s Germany.
Like 1920s Germany, 2020s US doesn’t see what is around the corner.
I think this needs to be reposted to empower people to recognize the dangers they face
This is why I like Elon, even though he's a mad technocrat. At least he's not afraid to say the sky is blue.
Every word out of my mouth is hate speech, on account of how eternally I hate these cunts.
Their agenda is so obvious and yet we keep letting them get away with it. It's so infuriating