NYT is literally named after the duke of york, the most prolific slave trader in the history of all of the americas.
This is actually hilarious. We see where the line is drawn for renaming things that were named for slave owners/ traffickers/etc. Schools, parks, animal species, YES, states, NO, too much trouble. What would all those douchey blue haired liberals who brag about being “New Yorkers” within seven minutes of moving there think if they knew they were citing some white devil slavemaster?!?
we need to meme this into reality. make some white supremacist posts worshiping the duke of york, and how everyone needs to move to new york to promote slavery. and then some posts about lefties getting their panties in a bunch and how the state needs to be renamed and everything with "york" in the name along with it.
they could even call it new ketanji, named after the black doesnt-know-what-a-woman-is who was admitted to the supreme court. or name it new obama, not after barack, but about his black tranny "wife".
A jew who isn't Jewish isn't a jew. He's typically a Leftist pretending to be a jew. The core element to a jew is his Judaism. It is his culture, his language, his history, his religion, his family, his friends, his community, his home, and his... uh, well, tradition.
Britain is a political entity that is comprised of 4 kingdoms, one of which is England. An englishman is necessarily British, and that is because England is part of Britain, and an englishman's culture, language, history, religion, family, friends, community, home, and traditions are English (which are thus British).
A non-English Englishman doesn't exist. A man living in England, who is a Pakistani Muslim, who opposes the existence of England, demands the construction of an Islamic Caliphate, doesn't speak English, doesn't interact outside his Islamist community, can not be English.
Removing the core element that defines the object is to remove the definition of the thing itself.
White on the other had, like all racial constructs, is a wildly broad construct defined almost entirely within a political sphere. It has no shared religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or even geography. While biological substrata exist ("Biological Race" if you will), these don't define the religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or geography.
You can have a white englishman. You can have a white jew. You can have a black englishman. You can have a black jew. You can't have a russian englishman, nor an athiest jew.
NYT's founder got his big break writing that northern slave owners should be allowed to hunt freed black slaves for sport.
NYT is literally named after the duke of york, the most prolific slave trader in the history of all of the americas.
now they're trying to wash that all away by supporting cosmic racial revenge, as long as it's aimed at non-jevvish whites.
This is actually hilarious. We see where the line is drawn for renaming things that were named for slave owners/ traffickers/etc. Schools, parks, animal species, YES, states, NO, too much trouble. What would all those douchey blue haired liberals who brag about being “New Yorkers” within seven minutes of moving there think if they knew they were citing some white devil slavemaster?!?
we need to meme this into reality. make some white supremacist posts worshiping the duke of york, and how everyone needs to move to new york to promote slavery. and then some posts about lefties getting their panties in a bunch and how the state needs to be renamed and everything with "york" in the name along with it.
they could even call it new ketanji, named after the black doesnt-know-what-a-woman-is who was admitted to the supreme court. or name it new obama, not after barack, but about his black tranny "wife".
it's shrodinger's jevv.
say they're not white, and suddenly you're getting cancelled for being a member of the KKK.
say they are white, and suddenly you're getting cancelled like whoopi goldberg.
really what it is, is that you're not allowed to talk about them at all unless it's "approved speech".
There are white jews as assuredly as there are white muslims.
Religions and ethnicities are different.
You can be British and not English, and vice versa.
You can be a Jew and not Jewish, same as.
Those aren't anything like each other.
A jew who isn't Jewish isn't a jew. He's typically a Leftist pretending to be a jew. The core element to a jew is his Judaism. It is his culture, his language, his history, his religion, his family, his friends, his community, his home, and his... uh, well, tradition.
Britain is a political entity that is comprised of 4 kingdoms, one of which is England. An englishman is necessarily British, and that is because England is part of Britain, and an englishman's culture, language, history, religion, family, friends, community, home, and traditions are English (which are thus British).
A non-English Englishman doesn't exist. A man living in England, who is a Pakistani Muslim, who opposes the existence of England, demands the construction of an Islamic Caliphate, doesn't speak English, doesn't interact outside his Islamist community, can not be English.
Being English is core to being an englishman.
Being Jewish is core to being a jew.
Removing the core element that defines the object is to remove the definition of the thing itself.
White on the other had, like all racial constructs, is a wildly broad construct defined almost entirely within a political sphere. It has no shared religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or even geography. While biological substrata exist ("Biological Race" if you will), these don't define the religion, tradition, language, culture, history, or geography.
You can have a white englishman. You can have a white jew. You can have a black englishman. You can have a black jew. You can't have a russian englishman, nor an athiest jew.
There are white jews, as there are black jews, as there are arab jews. Judaism is a religion.
They also denied the Holodomor, spread explicit Soviet Propaganda, and rationalized that Hitler had been reformed in Jail.