London Breed (SF Mayor): We Should ‘Get Rid of Most Taxes’ to Attract Businesses
(www.breitbart.com)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Good luck with that, considering the worst tax of all is federal income.
No in SF the worst tax of all is the "neighbourhood tax," where all of the neighbourhood folks get to tax you whatever percentage of your inventory they decide they want, and the cops and courts will punish you for trying to stop them.
What about LICA (Low Impulse Control American) Tax?
Might be worthwhile to include it in the SHIET (Security for Housing, Income, Equity and Trade) Act?
KANGZ AND
Oh no, you misunderstand: only businesses get tax relief.
You will have to pick up the tab.
Same shit in Germany:
Eco-nutjobs drive energy prices through the roof, which causes businesses to leave.
The solution? Special electricity prices for businesses, basically giving it to them for free. The people will still have to pay through the nose to keep their houses warm, put food on the table AND pay for the electricity used by businesses.
Its absolutely enraging what these nutjobs like Habeck do to Germany - as if the Covid-insanity with Mengele-wannabe Lauterbach wasnt enough.
And then they cry about the AfD, which is slowly about to become the strongest party.
Why does this sound like the most pathetic 'please stay, please?' statement, like she'd get on her knees and lick your soles clean just for you not to leave.
Well someone has to clean potential investors' soles because they got covered in hobo shit on the way from the Uber to the City Hall entrance.
This is without question the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard come out of an elected official.
The sheer financial irresponsibility to suggest this shows that SF is being led by a cabal of affirmative action morons.
Isn't she already the mayor? These sound like election talking points lol
My main problem with that is the inconsistency, the wishy-washiness. And the idiocy isn't over the policy, but the bizarreness of the speech.
She says she wants to get rid of taxes, but then says they need to pay their fair share.
This part is actually the part that annoys me the most, though. She "would also make sure"...if what? If fucking what, and why hasn't she yet? What is she waiting for?! She's in charge! It's empty political nonsense, but delivered especially incompetently. It's fantastical dreaming, but delivered as policy.
If she "would" make the streets clean and safe, why isn't she? And how is having less money going to make that more feasible, if the two are even related?
Leftists don't live in reality.
True. If they did, they wouldn't be leftists.
The tax system works for "somebody", and her job is to defend it. If that means blowing smoke up people's asses about safe streets, she will.
Political madlibs
I mean, lowering taxes is in fact the solution but they also need to completely end all redistribution payments to poor people then start shipping all the drug addicts to Antarctica.
For anyone who doesn’t follow SF politics, Breed ran on your typical POC progressive platform. Once she got elected though, she basically discovered that the city is a dysfunctional hellhole and that progressive policies are failing. She’s trying to reverse course, but there’s only so much she and the new DA Brooke Jenkins can do against an entrenched radical base along with greedy and corrupt city supervisors. She’s trying to maintain support from the general public, meanwhile all the radicals in the city believe they were betrayed and are trying to smear her with the label of being a covert Republican.
Devil's advocate: That might mean she just wants to simplify the tax code. Wishful thinking is that they would also adjust policies to make the city at all habitable to non-addicts.
The problem comes with also wanting "equity" because that can never be codified to public satisfaction.
How about get rid of the homeless drug addicts and the literal street feces.
I should stop being surprised that dumbfuck commie retards can always find ways to be more retarded.
You can't pay Walmart to open a shop in San Francisco to watch their stock be looted by your fuckwad voters. First things first, start prosecuting thieves and put them in jail and guarantee that anyone can stop a thief and if the thief causes ANY physical harm to the people stopping them its a minimum of 10 years in jail. Also, for that day, the thieves pay the security guards salaries that caught for the entire days wage.
All of a sudden that $975 theft law becomes useless because the guards can block the door and if they lay a hand on them they go to jail and they aren't getting any goods and now they have to pay the security guards fees as well.
For weal or woe, San Francisco has been the bellwether for the rest of the nation. The gay movement, communist teachings in school, and the tech industry all came from there.
That tax reform is even mentioned in the most retarded way is at least a glimmer that the tide may change.
They'll have to make up the loss in revenue somewhere, which means higher taxes for the populace while the businesses enjoy tax free operation.