You're underestimating how little thinking an NPC does. If CNN says that it doesn't exist, then it doesn't exist. End of story.
Even normies are pretty easy to trick. All you have to do is present a narrative and continue to show them the same clip over and over. Their normie brains will treat every viewing as a separate thing.
Example: the myth that white people are vastly overrepresented in mass shootings. They repeat the lie, then show a clip of a white person committing a mass shooting. Then they wait a couple hours, repeat the lie, show the clip. Wait a couple hours, repeat the lie, show the clip. And they'll do this for weeks, if not months. And it works. Nearly everyone believes that most if not all mass shootings are committed by a white guy with an AR-15-style fully semiautomatic assault battle rifle of war.
Whenever you think you're giving normies too little credit, you are wrong.
Its never a guarantee that someone is “noticing things” but it’s worth considering that the fact someone doesn’t explicitly say “I noticed X” is not necessarily proof they didn’t notice X. Hell, in certain circumstances with the social power and influence SJWs have to bring down consequences for things that go against their made-up narratives, we can’t even always take affirmative statements of SJW talking points as a sign that the person really believes them, the person may just be saying what he needs to say to avoid losing his job. It’s a bit cowardly of course, but the combination of SJW beliefs being (1) so blatantly in conflict with reality but (2) backed up by the power to wreck lives overnight, means we might not always be sure exactly what a person believes if they are not a sign-carrying activist or dressed in standard Clown World attire.
You'd be absolutely shocked at how people can be swayed to compartmentalize things despite otherwise believing every single aspect of something.
There are people who believe in Alien Conspiracies that still think "government good, should have more power" and that Illuminati type talk is just antisemitic racism.
Ironic. Actualpublicfreakouts was created because publicfreakouts was consumed by propaganda. Once the Hillary campaign bought Reddit, it just turned into a place to post Trump supporters being mildly annoyed so they could go OMG LOOK HOW DANGEROUS AND UNSTABLE THEY ARE 😱😱😱
As you're seeing here, this return to form did not last long. Looks like the king janny over there is a lolbert who thinks noticing patterns is equally as bad as soft genocide.
I actually think this form of drift among what constitutes the “real” subreddit for a subject is kind of fascinating, in a sad way. It’s literally that one badly-drawn webcomic, “You do not fit in here; we’ll make our own thing; Why are you excluding us” that gets passed around the ‘net a lot. And yet the point the SJW artist was making was “sometimes you don’t belong in a place!” Which is funny ironically because it never works that way.
Noticing patterns will always lead to politically-incorrect conclusions.
Mocking people for being violent retards will ''disproportionately impact'' certain demographics even without any understanding of the greater picture by the people making the comments.
So commenting has to be banned to maintain political orthodoxy.
Nigger behavior is nigger behavior, regardless if it's being perpetrated by a lone thug or a mob on a chimp-out. Pretending that's not the case is to be willfully ignorant.
To satisfy Dom, an addendum: I use 'nigger' as a synonym for 'scoundrel'. Not every black person is a nigger, and frankly not every nigger is black. But despite making up only 13% of the population...
Saying "nigger" is not enough to violate Rule 15 for multiple reasons. This comment violates Rule 16 because it insinuates that morally degenerate behavior is inherent to blacks
This comment violates Rule 16 because it insinuates that morally degenerate behavior is inherent to blacks, and that the spread of their behavior is the intentional effort of a jewish racial conspiracy.
The difference is that the "right winger opinion" uptick was likely natural. Subs become left wing echo chambers by banning dissenters, which is probably what this is a lead up to.
Yeah dude is a massive whiny faggot. He used to mod cringetopia too and he would complain that people were too political. A lefty mod on cringetopia banned my alt, for not calling a man a woman, before it was modded and I cussed them out because we'd already had issues with some mods doing that because they were sjws. I had went off and them and the head mod specifically agreed with me because I was modded in the first place to watch out for such faggotry.
Well they get all prissy and start whining at me for being mean in mod mail as a user because they for some reason couldn't grasp that I was also a mod despite clearly referring to the conversation in the mod discord.
Not to have cosmetic surgery or compulsively clean, but he may have a point, or he may have just missed his HRT this month and be throwing a fit.
We would need a better sample of what content is considered "the same chorus of low IQ rabble", though once people start to notice things, it is hard to get them to stop, especially when they are villianized.
The way I see things if you choose to work as a moderator that means you do your job.
This is the equivalent to a Burger King refusing to allow people to order what they want because "customers are morons."
If you don't agree with a community you moderate then fucking leave it and let someone else handle things. These little hissy fits and virtue signaling is so pathetic.
They refuse to give up power but also refuse to do their job. Kind of astonishing how so little power goes to their heads like this.
I had not really picked up on the dereliction of duty aspect to this whole thing, and I can see how putting everyone in comment time out would qualify as refusing to moderate.
As you suggested, their mod team letting different people take over or moving to a sub that is more regulated to their liking would be better than shutting off the ability to comment.
In the spirit of moderation, I was being a bit lazy and hoping someone would post an example of the content (rather than look it up myself as I try not to Reddit for any reason) to see if his complaint had any merit, or if he was being just as stupid and low effort as he claimed the posters on his sub are.
Just like the 'actualpublicfreakouts' sweeping censorship, this seems to have backfired.
I guess I was being overly charitable in my original post, but after reading over the mod post again, I agree with your point about mod discomfort and (as that post does not specifically mention rules) it not being against the rules of the sub.
If there were rules against racial commentary or noticing things, the "offending" posters would be better off moving subs or platforms entirely.
Aka people are noticing things and reddit jannies can't stand it.
It actually baffles me that some people might NOT notice these things.
It's too obvious, specially if you consume content like that (public freak-outs, street fights, crime, etc...).
I still think that normies see the demographic reality of these "chimp out " kind of videos but block it out (consciously or not).
You're underestimating how little thinking an NPC does. If CNN says that it doesn't exist, then it doesn't exist. End of story.
Even normies are pretty easy to trick. All you have to do is present a narrative and continue to show them the same clip over and over. Their normie brains will treat every viewing as a separate thing.
Example: the myth that white people are vastly overrepresented in mass shootings. They repeat the lie, then show a clip of a white person committing a mass shooting. Then they wait a couple hours, repeat the lie, show the clip. Wait a couple hours, repeat the lie, show the clip. And they'll do this for weeks, if not months. And it works. Nearly everyone believes that most if not all mass shootings are committed by a white guy with an AR-15-style fully semiautomatic assault battle rifle of war.
Whenever you think you're giving normies too little credit, you are wrong.
The jannies KNOW that most people form their opinions from what society suggests -
(stage 3) :
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-journey-your-life/202209/understanding-the-5-stages-adult-development
So by mass censorship they can shape politics
Its never a guarantee that someone is “noticing things” but it’s worth considering that the fact someone doesn’t explicitly say “I noticed X” is not necessarily proof they didn’t notice X. Hell, in certain circumstances with the social power and influence SJWs have to bring down consequences for things that go against their made-up narratives, we can’t even always take affirmative statements of SJW talking points as a sign that the person really believes them, the person may just be saying what he needs to say to avoid losing his job. It’s a bit cowardly of course, but the combination of SJW beliefs being (1) so blatantly in conflict with reality but (2) backed up by the power to wreck lives overnight, means we might not always be sure exactly what a person believes if they are not a sign-carrying activist or dressed in standard Clown World attire.
You'd be absolutely shocked at how people can be swayed to compartmentalize things despite otherwise believing every single aspect of something.
There are people who believe in Alien Conspiracies that still think "government good, should have more power" and that Illuminati type talk is just antisemitic racism.
Rent. Free.
Ironic. Actualpublicfreakouts was created because publicfreakouts was consumed by propaganda. Once the Hillary campaign bought Reddit, it just turned into a place to post Trump supporters being mildly annoyed so they could go OMG LOOK HOW DANGEROUS AND UNSTABLE THEY ARE 😱😱😱
As you're seeing here, this return to form did not last long. Looks like the king janny over there is a lolbert who thinks noticing patterns is equally as bad as soft genocide.
I actually think this form of drift among what constitutes the “real” subreddit for a subject is kind of fascinating, in a sad way. It’s literally that one badly-drawn webcomic, “You do not fit in here; we’ll make our own thing; Why are you excluding us” that gets passed around the ‘net a lot. And yet the point the SJW artist was making was “sometimes you don’t belong in a place!” Which is funny ironically because it never works that way.
Noticing patterns will always lead to politically-incorrect conclusions.
Mocking people for being violent retards will ''disproportionately impact'' certain demographics even without any understanding of the greater picture by the people making the comments.
So commenting has to be banned to maintain political orthodoxy.
Nigger behavior is nigger behavior, regardless if it's being perpetrated by a lone thug or a mob on a chimp-out. Pretending that's not the case is to be willfully ignorant.
To satisfy Dom, an addendum: I use 'nigger' as a synonym for 'scoundrel'. Not every black person is a nigger, and frankly not every nigger is black. But despite making up only 13% of the population...
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Saying "nigger" is not enough to violate Rule 15 for multiple reasons. This comment violates Rule 16 because it insinuates that morally degenerate behavior is inherent to blacks
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This comment violates Rule 16 because it insinuates that morally degenerate behavior is inherent to blacks, and that the spread of their behavior is the intentional effort of a jewish racial conspiracy.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent SpeechDo not threaten to kill users.Comment Approved
How many "public freakout" subs have been pozzed now, two or three?
The jannies KNOW that most people form their opinions from what society suggests -
(stage 3) :
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-journey-your-life/202209/understanding-the-5-stages-adult-development
So by mass censorship they can shape politics
[removed]
[removed]
Thats one of the very few subs on that site worth visiting. It shows more niggers than the tame Publicfreakout.
The difference is that the "right winger opinion" uptick was likely natural. Subs become left wing echo chambers by banning dissenters, which is probably what this is a lead up to.
Yeah dude is a massive whiny faggot. He used to mod cringetopia too and he would complain that people were too political. A lefty mod on cringetopia banned my alt, for not calling a man a woman, before it was modded and I cussed them out because we'd already had issues with some mods doing that because they were sjws. I had went off and them and the head mod specifically agreed with me because I was modded in the first place to watch out for such faggotry.
Well they get all prissy and start whining at me for being mean in mod mail as a user because they for some reason couldn't grasp that I was also a mod despite clearly referring to the conversation in the mod discord.
Tldr; he's an elitist prick
lol at you autistic dip-shits that still go on reddit and bitch about it
Not to have cosmetic surgery or compulsively clean, but he may have a point, or he may have just missed his HRT this month and be throwing a fit.
We would need a better sample of what content is considered "the same chorus of low IQ rabble", though once people start to notice things, it is hard to get them to stop, especially when they are villianized.
The way I see things if you choose to work as a moderator that means you do your job.
This is the equivalent to a Burger King refusing to allow people to order what they want because "customers are morons."
If you don't agree with a community you moderate then fucking leave it and let someone else handle things. These little hissy fits and virtue signaling is so pathetic.
They refuse to give up power but also refuse to do their job. Kind of astonishing how so little power goes to their heads like this.
I had not really picked up on the dereliction of duty aspect to this whole thing, and I can see how putting everyone in comment time out would qualify as refusing to moderate.
As you suggested, their mod team letting different people take over or moving to a sub that is more regulated to their liking would be better than shutting off the ability to comment.
What would that be?
That mod is doing the exact same thing he's admonishing others for by calling them low IQ rabble.
In the spirit of moderation, I was being a bit lazy and hoping someone would post an example of the content (rather than look it up myself as I try not to Reddit for any reason) to see if his complaint had any merit, or if he was being just as stupid and low effort as he claimed the posters on his sub are.
Just like the 'actualpublicfreakouts' sweeping censorship, this seems to have backfired.
All good man
I guess I was being overly charitable in my original post, but after reading over the mod post again, I agree with your point about mod discomfort and (as that post does not specifically mention rules) it not being against the rules of the sub.
If there were rules against racial commentary or noticing things, the "offending" posters would be better off moving subs or platforms entirely.