Certainly that's the case now, in spite of what leftist propaganda might say, not even the most overtly theocratic Evangelical from the 80s would approve of chucking gays off the nearest rooftop simply for being gay. Hell, contrary to leftist propaganda, Uganda doesn't do that either.
On the flipside, medieval & Early Modern Christians prescribed burning at the stake as the punishment for sodomy. IIRC that's where the origin of 'faggot' (a 'bundle of sticks' = kindling after all) as an insult comes from. The conservative backlash against post-60s degeneracy is only starting to get going: with luck I'll live long enough to witness 'Make Faggots Flammable Again' dethrone 'Love Is Love' as the popular motto of the age.
Of course. If it doesn't 'validate their existence' (puff up their ego), it's evil, homophobic, bigoted, literally Hitleresque, etc. The trannies' entitlement complex didn't come out of nowhere, in many regards it's a copy of their precursors' mentality (just taken to even more unbearable heights). Just like the trannies, the LGs could never accept nothing less than being perpetually celebrated and adored by the 'breeders' they hold in such contempt: 'just live and let live' was always a lie for the majority of the gay rights movement.
Incidentally this is a big reason as to why I do not believe it is useful to distinguish the LG from the T, in the end. Evil and disorder are evil and disorder, be they lesser or greater. Groups like Gays Against Groomers (weak and despised by their own aisle they might be) might serve a purpose as a tactical tool in the here & now, but when you are done with a tool, you put it away - in this case, back in the closet for the good of everyone else. (Before you feel too bad about this stance, I guarantee that they feel the exact same way about the right side of the aisle: I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
If they aren't actively attacking the right. It's been especially disappointing seeing James Lindsay take this tack, for example.
Ffs even the right does this. Rod Dreher for example. The LCMS (Lutheran group in the US) is currently experiencing this in its own way right now, too.
There was a poll a few years ago that revealed that, in America, Evangelical Christians were less pro-LGBT than Muslims. Muslim attitudes within the US were generally trending towards shitlib. That's probably backsliding now, in line with a generalized backslide of liberalism.
I'm not sure. Liberalism's backslide is happening in large part due to it adopting post-modern nonsense and the collapse of trust in liberal institutions thanks to their corruption becoming increasingly brazen.
Ironically, or maybe obviously, it's progressives fueling this.
We were making "tolerance" work. We told the Muslims "you can come here and believe what you like, so long as you follow our (Christian) laws and tolerate everyone else" and we told the gays "you can put your dicks in another man's ass, so long as you follow our laws and tolerate everyone else.
Then the progs turned from "tolerance" to "acceptance".
Muslims will never accept gays, gays will never accept muslims, and I'll never accept either. I was fine living and letting live, but progs won't accept that.
I think those were the lies told to normies into accepting gays and Muslims, the truth is "do whatever you want as long as you are attacking the huwite Christians more than each other"
EDIT: The account has since been suspended, but it basically showed a bunch kids throwing rocks at a western reporter who wasn't wearning her hijab and it was the mother encouraging them.
they don't need to though, they'll be treated as protected class in the west, and then once they reached the critical mass population, they'll take over local governments and enforce their ideologies even if they're not officially legislated
I'm old enough to remember Christians planting pipe bombs in abortion clinics and murdering doctors. After the catholic priest scandal in 99' all the fight went out of them though.
The problem is that they will vote for the party of mass-immigration, affirmative action and protects against "islamophobia".
They chose money and power over religion, this was just another form of virtue signaling.
This is going to horrify Justin Trudeau. All of these proponents of childhood mastectomies and penectomies are officially on notice. The minority communities that have propped up your governments have finally had enough.
Islam is right about LGBT.
They are even more strict on it than Christianity if I remember correctly
Certainly that's the case now, in spite of what leftist propaganda might say, not even the most overtly theocratic Evangelical from the 80s would approve of chucking gays off the nearest rooftop simply for being gay. Hell, contrary to leftist propaganda, Uganda doesn't do that either.
On the flipside, medieval & Early Modern Christians prescribed burning at the stake as the punishment for sodomy. IIRC that's where the origin of 'faggot' (a 'bundle of sticks' = kindling after all) as an insult comes from. The conservative backlash against post-60s degeneracy is only starting to get going: with luck I'll live long enough to witness 'Make Faggots Flammable Again' dethrone 'Love Is Love' as the popular motto of the age.
I’m Christian and growing up in the 80s and 90s I frequently heard “love the sinner but hate the sin”. Gays found that offensive
Of course. If it doesn't 'validate their existence' (puff up their ego), it's evil, homophobic, bigoted, literally Hitleresque, etc. The trannies' entitlement complex didn't come out of nowhere, in many regards it's a copy of their precursors' mentality (just taken to even more unbearable heights). Just like the trannies, the LGs could never accept nothing less than being perpetually celebrated and adored by the 'breeders' they hold in such contempt: 'just live and let live' was always a lie for the majority of the gay rights movement.
Incidentally this is a big reason as to why I do not believe it is useful to distinguish the LG from the T, in the end. Evil and disorder are evil and disorder, be they lesser or greater. Groups like Gays Against Groomers (weak and despised by their own aisle they might be) might serve a purpose as a tactical tool in the here & now, but when you are done with a tool, you put it away - in this case, back in the closet for the good of everyone else. (Before you feel too bad about this stance, I guarantee that they feel the exact same way about the right side of the aisle: I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
If they aren't actively attacking the right. It's been especially disappointing seeing James Lindsay take this tack, for example.
Ffs even the right does this. Rod Dreher for example. The LCMS (Lutheran group in the US) is currently experiencing this in its own way right now, too.
There was a poll a few years ago that revealed that, in America, Evangelical Christians were less pro-LGBT than Muslims. Muslim attitudes within the US were generally trending towards shitlib. That's probably backsliding now, in line with a generalized backslide of liberalism.
Probably has to do with new waves of Muslims immigrants vastly out numbering the "Muslims" born in the US
I'm not sure. Liberalism's backslide is happening in large part due to it adopting post-modern nonsense and the collapse of trust in liberal institutions thanks to their corruption becoming increasingly brazen.
Islam is right
about LGBT.Exactly! Please and blessings be upon Mohammad, the one true prophet whose wives were all old enough to consent.
Memba Lindsay Shepherd? https://twitter.com/NewWorldHominin/status/1667203563318304769
Choose your team:
Edmonton teacher who lectured Muslim students about how they "don't belong here" if they reject Pride
or
Muslims who cheer as their sons repeatedly stomp on the Pride progress flag
That's an easy one.
Goat fuckers.
Seems like kid fuckers either way, tbh. /s
Christians do not inspire the fear of God. Thus, Evil is emboldened in the West.
Holy Wars 2.0.
Jihadist and Crusaders against a common enemy.
Lets fuckin go.
Ironically, or maybe obviously, it's progressives fueling this.
We were making "tolerance" work. We told the Muslims "you can come here and believe what you like, so long as you follow our (Christian) laws and tolerate everyone else" and we told the gays "you can put your dicks in another man's ass, so long as you follow our laws and tolerate everyone else.
Then the progs turned from "tolerance" to "acceptance".
Muslims will never accept gays, gays will never accept muslims, and I'll never accept either. I was fine living and letting live, but progs won't accept that.
I think those were the lies told to normies into accepting gays and Muslims, the truth is "do whatever you want as long as you are attacking the huwite Christians more than each other"
Her Romanian husband is pretty based as well.
That story had a happy ending (so far).
This is exactly why Islam is bullet proof. Teach your kids when they're young.
I posted a video a while back explaining why Islam will never be subvertted
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/15IqslX9KJ/why-islamic-countries-arent-susc/c
EDIT: The account has since been suspended, but it basically showed a bunch kids throwing rocks at a western reporter who wasn't wearning her hijab and it was the mother encouraging them.
Islam isn't bulletproof. Christians used to be militantly against this stuff as well.
Christians weren't willing to use mostly peaceful bomb vests though.
I don't think I've seen Muslims suicide bomb just to stop LGBTP.
they don't need to though, they'll be treated as protected class in the west, and then once they reached the critical mass population, they'll take over local governments and enforce their ideologies even if they're not officially legislated
They're just another (mostly) non-white demographic for the system to use against us.
I'm old enough to remember Christians planting pipe bombs in abortion clinics and murdering doctors. After the catholic priest scandal in 99' all the fight went out of them though.
İ would say form an alliance. The other team has proven to be parasitic, İslam on the other Hans can be an ally.
WTF I fucking love Muslims now
I don't, but I'll certainly take their side in this case.
You won't when the rape gangs go after your underage daughters.
Muslims are not exactly the gold standard in the anti-degeneracy department.
The problem is that they will vote for the party of mass-immigration, affirmative action and protects against "islamophobia". They chose money and power over religion, this was just another form of virtue signaling.
VIDEO: https://twitter.com/TheRealKeean/status/1667194338286383104
Still waiting for the Islam truck to make an appearance at one of these faggot parades.
Anyfucking time now, Ahmed.
Muslims will be demonized as the next White Supremacist Extremists, with a tan and a funny accent.
Already done post 9/11.
based that it happened but cringe that there's enough of them in canada for it to
Allahu a'alam!
I was just thinking my local mosque looked a little dull, maybe a few flags would add a splash of color.
I'm not sure it poses a conundrum for Trudeau at all. He can always choose not to comment.