Certainly that's the case now, in spite of what leftist propaganda might say, not even the most overtly theocratic Evangelical from the 80s would approve of chucking gays off the nearest rooftop simply for being gay. Hell, contrary to leftist propaganda, Uganda doesn't do that either.
On the flipside, medieval & Early Modern Christians prescribed burning at the stake as the punishment for sodomy. IIRC that's where the origin of 'faggot' (a 'bundle of sticks' = kindling after all) as an insult comes from. The conservative backlash against post-60s degeneracy is only starting to get going: with luck I'll live long enough to witness 'Make Faggots Flammable Again' dethrone 'Love Is Love' as the popular motto of the age.
Of course. If it doesn't 'validate their existence' (puff up their ego), it's evil, homophobic, bigoted, literally Hitleresque, etc. The trannies' entitlement complex didn't come out of nowhere, in many regards it's a copy of their precursors' mentality (just taken to even more unbearable heights). Just like the trannies, the LGs could never accept nothing less than being perpetually celebrated and adored by the 'breeders' they hold in such contempt: 'just live and let live' was always a lie for the majority of the gay rights movement.
Incidentally this is a big reason as to why I do not believe it is useful to distinguish the LG from the T, in the end. Evil and disorder are evil and disorder, be they lesser or greater. Groups like Gays Against Groomers (weak and despised by their own aisle they might be) might serve a purpose as a tactical tool in the here & now, but when you are done with a tool, you put it away - in this case, back in the closet for the good of everyone else. (Before you feel too bad about this stance, I guarantee that they feel the exact same way about the right side of the aisle: I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
If they aren't actively attacking the right. It's been especially disappointing seeing James Lindsay take this tack, for example.
Ffs even the right does this. Rod Dreher for example. The LCMS (Lutheran group in the US) is currently experiencing this in its own way right now, too.
There was a poll a few years ago that revealed that, in America, Evangelical Christians were less pro-LGBT than Muslims. Muslim attitudes within the US were generally trending towards shitlib. That's probably backsliding now, in line with a generalized backslide of liberalism.
I'm not sure. Liberalism's backslide is happening in large part due to it adopting post-modern nonsense and the collapse of trust in liberal institutions thanks to their corruption becoming increasingly brazen.
They are even more strict on it than Christianity if I remember correctly
Certainly that's the case now, in spite of what leftist propaganda might say, not even the most overtly theocratic Evangelical from the 80s would approve of chucking gays off the nearest rooftop simply for being gay. Hell, contrary to leftist propaganda, Uganda doesn't do that either.
On the flipside, medieval & Early Modern Christians prescribed burning at the stake as the punishment for sodomy. IIRC that's where the origin of 'faggot' (a 'bundle of sticks' = kindling after all) as an insult comes from. The conservative backlash against post-60s degeneracy is only starting to get going: with luck I'll live long enough to witness 'Make Faggots Flammable Again' dethrone 'Love Is Love' as the popular motto of the age.
I’m Christian and growing up in the 80s and 90s I frequently heard “love the sinner but hate the sin”. Gays found that offensive
Of course. If it doesn't 'validate their existence' (puff up their ego), it's evil, homophobic, bigoted, literally Hitleresque, etc. The trannies' entitlement complex didn't come out of nowhere, in many regards it's a copy of their precursors' mentality (just taken to even more unbearable heights). Just like the trannies, the LGs could never accept nothing less than being perpetually celebrated and adored by the 'breeders' they hold in such contempt: 'just live and let live' was always a lie for the majority of the gay rights movement.
Incidentally this is a big reason as to why I do not believe it is useful to distinguish the LG from the T, in the end. Evil and disorder are evil and disorder, be they lesser or greater. Groups like Gays Against Groomers (weak and despised by their own aisle they might be) might serve a purpose as a tactical tool in the here & now, but when you are done with a tool, you put it away - in this case, back in the closet for the good of everyone else. (Before you feel too bad about this stance, I guarantee that they feel the exact same way about the right side of the aisle: I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
If they aren't actively attacking the right. It's been especially disappointing seeing James Lindsay take this tack, for example.
Ffs even the right does this. Rod Dreher for example. The LCMS (Lutheran group in the US) is currently experiencing this in its own way right now, too.
There was a poll a few years ago that revealed that, in America, Evangelical Christians were less pro-LGBT than Muslims. Muslim attitudes within the US were generally trending towards shitlib. That's probably backsliding now, in line with a generalized backslide of liberalism.
Probably has to do with new waves of Muslims immigrants vastly out numbering the "Muslims" born in the US
I'm not sure. Liberalism's backslide is happening in large part due to it adopting post-modern nonsense and the collapse of trust in liberal institutions thanks to their corruption becoming increasingly brazen.