Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

72
Anglo-Saxons Never Existed, Claims Cambridge University (www.breitbart.com)
posted 3 years ago by TerpenoidTester 3 years ago by TerpenoidTester +72 / -0
Erasing the English: Anglo-Saxons Never Existed, Claims Cambridge
Cambridge is reportedly teaching that Anglo-Saxons never existed as a unique ethnic group to dispel alleged nationalist "myths" about Britain.
www.breitbart.com
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– RoulerBleu 33 points 3 years ago +33 / -0

"Akshually, it's not genocide because the people we are gradually making extinct don't even exist." ~Leftists.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Feelsgood2020 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

We aren't doing it, but if we were that would not be a problem.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Nathrandir 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

That thing they aren't doing would be a good thing, in fact.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– TerpenoidTester [S] 32 points 3 years ago +32 / -0

In an ironic turn of events, the Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic (ASNC) at the once prestigious Cambridge University in England is now attempting to dismantle the very ideas inherent in the title of the department, claiming that the Anglo-Saxon ethnic group is apparently a racist concoction meant to stoke British nationalism, according to a report from London’s Daily Telegraph.

“One concern has been to address recent concerns over use of the term ‘Anglo-Saxon’ and its perceived connection to ethnic/racial English identity.”

“In general, ASNC teaching seeks to dismantle the basis of myths of nationalism… by showing students just how constructed and contingent these identities are and always have been,” they continued.

Apparently unsatisfied with dispelling the supposed “myth” of the Anglo-Saxon people, the university department went on to claim that there was never a “coherent” ethnic identity for the peoples in England, Ireland, Scotland, or Wales.

The attempt to brand the term as toxic has succeeded to such an extent that the International Society of Anglo-Saxonists decided in 2019 to change its name to the International Society for the Study of Early Medieval England due to “the problematic connotations that are widely associated with the terms ‘Anglo-Saxon’.”

The name change came shortly after the resignation of Canadian academic Dr Mary Rambaran-Olm from the organisation, who later claimed that the study of Anglo-Saxon history is fraught with “inherent whiteness” and that the “Anglo-Saxon myth perpetuates a false idea of what it means to be ‘native’ to Britain.”

Former UKIP politician turned host of the Lotus Eaters Podcast, Carl Benjamin said: “We aren’t having it, you smarmy pseudo intellectual subversives. We, the English, exist. We have existed for a thousand years, and that isn’t going to change now. No discussion. No dialectic. We are the English and we live in England. Simple as.”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Mary Rambaran-Olm

Vey Anglo-Saxon

Carl Benjamin

Oh,Sargon

"You tried doing civic nationalism, and where did that lead you? Back to me."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 29 points 3 years ago +29 / -0

This is part of that "deconstructing whiteness" bullshit that the left and even many mainstream conservatives support.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Gizortnik 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Nooooo. Deconstructing Whiteness would actually involve recognizing Anglo-Saxons outside of the concept of a White race.

This is about deconstructing an English identity, and assimilating everyone into a Globalist nomad people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

They are deconstructing Anglo-Saxons because they are within the white race. They don't do this to anyone else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They do this as a tactic to any and all groups that need to be broken down.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Who is "they" and when do "they" do this to Jews?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 28 points 3 years ago +28 / -0

In a couple hundred years White People will never have existed while simultaneously we’ll still be blamed for everything wrong with the world.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– SomeRando 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

Lazy pilpulling that can be affixed to anyone with a clear, if not overtly stated agenda - when they claim to be "abolishing whiteness", that tells you everything you need to know.

Every culture is valid except for the white, we're going to pluck out your eyes, put them on our fingertips like fucking olives while mocking your screams but don't be mean to us ever!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– TyCat999999 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

For the woke Marxist movement (which has clearly completed its long march through our academic institutions) it really isn’t important if the revisions, alterations, reinterpretations, etc. make sense or can be logically supported, it’s much more important that they just keep making them. That way no one can ever have the confidence of certainty on any point, and it’s that much easier to replicate their ideas-of-the-moment in other brains. Another poster has already quoted 1984, but I’m reminded of an early scene where Smith is told that a certain old article mentions someone now out of favor with the Party, and he must go change the archives. He notes how most jobs-worths would simply switch the outcome of the old story (previously if it concerned a now-hated person winning something, just change it to make that person lose the thing) but that he found it more interesting to wholly invent a new situation. If I remember right he changes a fairly unremarkable story into one where the unperson died heroically fighting for the current party orthodoxy back in the day. Point being, it doesn’t matter what the fuck they say or believe or claim, the only point is that they can never let us be certain of anything. That’s to their advantage, always.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

"our people have always been here, your people don't exist."

the march towards genocide continues

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– almond_activator 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

I'm waiting for the non-existent Saxons to wake up and do something about their institutions attempting to erase them from existence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Gizortnik 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Read about the first king of England. You're gonna keep waiting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– KingLion7 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Out of curiosity, I read some quick summaries on him but I am not sure what you are talking about. For the sake of historical knowledge, what controversy are you referring to? Him being possibly of bastard birth?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Oops, I meant Alfred The Great, not Aethelstan. The Lotus Eaters did a great documentary on him.

Alfred was an incredible King, seems (honestly) like one of the best Kings ever. I meant to basically say that as king of all the Anglos (and technically the Anglo-Saxons), that one of his biggest problems was the fact that the other Anglo kings would still try to wage war with him, while he was trying to fight off the damned Danes. Even though literal Dane Law rules a huge swathe of your country and people, and you have regular raids against your home by these foreign invaders, the Anglo-Saxons found plenty of time to fight each other, rather than the Danes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– bloodguard 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Scary thing is that they've infiltrated museums. As their agenda marches on stuff is going to get destroyed because it doesn't support their new narrative.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

I beg your fucking pardon!? The writing before the Ngl arrived was carving in trees. Sachsnglish was very distinct and had to be chosen by the people. The language has modified and changed for centuries. From any point of view there was a distinct culture that entered and began to develop in Albuun. What idiot in his right mind could even talk about something so easily traceable?

Heck, I started to learn Old English just to study more about Vikings because the better records directly from that time were kept by my namesake.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– bamboozler1 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

It’s interesting that we get “England” and “English” from the Angles, but yet we generally refer to the Saxons much more…

I did a bit of reading on this recently - it’s suggested this is because the Saxons were more into military leadership/conquest, whereas the Angles, who dominated a slightly different part of the “country”/island were more into developing the culture and stuff…

And also because apparently a larger proportion of Angles shuffled off to Britain, vis à vis the Saxons who left like half their people behind…

Interesting that the Jutes barely rate a mention, though, lol…

Ah, the Dark Ages…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I think it's because the Jutes settled and then didn't do a lot. It was all about looking at the historic Angles. They chose to be a new unified people as opposed to the others. The same was happening in the North, but it got lost to history when the Vikings stopped being a thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Matamoros834 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Someone ought to tell that to the Celts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– bamboozler1 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

In the sense that they likely thought of themselves more as "Angles, Saxons or Jutes", sure...

But they most definitely existed, as far as a collective term for the dominant ethnic group occupying England at the time, so... Cambridge is wrong. Obviously...

But do remember Anglo-Saxons ≠ "Britons", who were the native people before the Romans arrived, and who merged with other groups as they came to "dominate" later on...

It's complicated. Obviously...

But all of these groups would be considered "white", so... shrug.

Of course Cambridge hates that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KingLion7 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Are the Anglos committing suicide or being murdered? Or both?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 53 ▼
– deleted 53 points 3 years ago +53 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– IfThatIsWhatYouThunk 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Keep in mind that 1984 and Animal Farm were both inspired by the real life Soviet Union. This is just commie bullshit repeating itself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SR388-SAX 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I was under the impression that they were inspired by his own experience with the people that he ran with when he was an idiot communist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– IfThatIsWhatYouThunk 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Probably, but Animal Farm is an obvious allegory for the communist revolution in Russia. It's why a Soviet tool tried to stop it from being printed back in the day.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy