I heard about this. It’s some semantics bullshit. It isn’t a “tuck friendly” bathing suit. Rather, it’s “gender affirming.” It’s the equivalent of saying “that’s not a ‘car’ it’s an ‘automobile.’”
That’s why I like Twitter’s community fact checkers as opposed to Facebook/Instagram. I trust the chaotic neutral of Twitter’s community over the leftists with agendas that Zuck uses.
When backed in a corner they play dumb and semantics games. Be surprised if they dont resort full on to 'what even is a bathing suit, like clothes you wear in the bath?'
The fact check is that they don't have "tuck friendly" bathing suits for children. Rather they have "tuck friendly" bathing suits for XS adults that just happen to be in the children's section. What a wacky misunderstanding; now face the wall.
It's like that Trump fact check about the economy they labelled "mostly false" but in the "fact check" they admitted literally everything he said was true but you couldn't prove it was 100% because of him and him alone/
It's probably some dumb shit like "It's an adult bathing suit. We They put it in the front for visibility which happened to be near the children's section."
I heard about this. It’s some semantics bullshit. It isn’t a “tuck friendly” bathing suit. Rather, it’s “gender affirming.” It’s the equivalent of saying “that’s not a ‘car’ it’s an ‘automobile.’”
It's Pedowear either way.
Groomerwear™. Make your young partner feel special by giving her* the swimwear to look fabulous!
That’s why I like Twitter’s community fact checkers as opposed to Facebook/Instagram. I trust the chaotic neutral of Twitter’s community over the leftists with agendas that Zuck uses.
It's a Porsc-aaaaahhhhh.
it's levioSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
No wonder she doesn't have any friends
Sometimes a police cruiser is not a motor vehicle. Semantics can have huge dollar values. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZhCsr2yLBQ
When backed in a corner they play dumb and semantics games. Be surprised if they dont resort full on to 'what even is a bathing suit, like clothes you wear in the bath?'
The fact check is that they don't have "tuck friendly" bathing suits for children. Rather they have "tuck friendly" bathing suits for XS adults that just happen to be in the children's section. What a wacky misunderstanding; now face the wall.
It's like that Trump fact check about the economy they labelled "mostly false" but in the "fact check" they admitted literally everything he said was true but you couldn't prove it was 100% because of him and him alone/
Or when NYT(?) said Trump lied when he said 40% black unemployment, and you read the end to find out the actual number was 37%.
He rounded it to the nearest 5, how dare he!?
The nearest 5 would be 35%. Consider yourself fact checked!
"Fact check" literally means "some troon's opinion".
Being a troon is living a lie
Ok, let's humor them, the bathing suit is false, what about the other shit like the onesie? is that for an adult midget or something?
It's probably some dumb shit like "It's an adult bathing suit.
WeThey put it in the front for visibility which happened to be near the children's section."This is as pedantic as "That depends on what your definition of 'is' is." from Bill Clinton years ago.
There are no tanks in the city!
/
distantnearby tank noisesIf you have IG here's the reel: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Csq8fL0rtf5/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==
I wonder how much they paid Big Mike in consulting fees to help design this.