Jordan Neely 2.0: Passengers Intervene as Security Struggles to Contain Aggressive Individual Who was Threatening People on CTA ...
A chaotic scene unfolded at the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Blue Grand Station in West Town as passengers to matters into their own hands when security personnel were unable to contain an aggressive individual threatening fellow commuters.
My secret hope is that this is the start of something where people are so fed up with how useless politicians with their policies and police either not reacting or unable to react because of low numbers or restrictions that we are getting a rise in people handling it themselves.
There is a reason why Koreatown was avoided during the 'summer of love', criminals are REALLY afraid of when ordinary people decide that it's better to fight you than be afraid of you.
Vigilantism begins when the people lose faith in the governments ability or desire to protect them and enforce laws.
I agree but I think I should apply a point here for a difference between vigilantism and self defence before we run into the leftist trap on the two:
Self defence is just like the title, it's defensive and a reaction to immediate provocation and violence. This can happen in any society but increased rates of incidents could indicate lack of public security
Vigilantism is proactive, you're looking for the threat and wanting to wipe them out before they harm others.
So far it's only been self defence, unless there's a sudden spate of gangbangers, pedos or drug dealers being hunted and killed, we haven't had vigilantes yet.
All a vigilante is is someone who defends their community without government approval, and makes the regime look bad in doing so.
Why do you think there's such a push to make Batman look ineffectual these days?
Batman is ineffectual. Batman's whole schtick is being mentally ill and refusing to kill because "guns bad killing bad". Batman has been used to train stupidity into generations.
TIL it's batmans fault that no one in Gotham knows what the fucking death penalty is.
"Refusing to kill" Batman is not the only version of Batman. He carried a pistol in the original Detective Comics.
The Punisher has entered the chat.
I don't but I notice it's one of their 'concept games' where they are deliberately mixing up the two because they want no way for the public to fight back, whether defensively or proactively.
They're already against self defense, so don't be surprised when they pretend it's the same as vigilantism to try to ban it.
I posted this somewhere else, forget where: the greatest crime against the state is the usurpation of the state’s authority (over you). Vigilantism represents the most immediate and primal rejection, of the state’s power, by the individual. That is why the state, collectively, comes down so hard on the vigilante.
This is also very true of the individual as much as it is groups. Career criminals have admitted that they're terrified that the targets they pick might be armed more than if a cop is present. Cops have rules and protocols to follow. People defending their own life don't.
This is why the state is so insistent upon disarmament: So that the public is as reliant upon the state as is humanly possible.
Good god, I fucking hope so.
Do you not realize that we face more issues than just black crime? Those replacement Americans are an economic wipe out of the white American working class. Despite that, there isn't even much anti-Asian sentiment coming out of white nationalists anyway. This is just a typical cucky-right take that obsesses over "imperfections" in white right-wingers politics instead of being critical of the putrid and disgusting politics of a minority. Conservative media has trained you well.
At least we're in agreement with you being a dipshit.
Democrat bot
Your choice is having a somewhat liveable society, as I'm sure you agree Asian societies are, or a anarcho-tyrannical hellhole.
I'm not sure what you hope to achieve by being 'critical' of a minority's politics. And not sure how just supporting Democrats is 'disgusting'. Maybe Republicans don't properly speak to their concerns.
What dumbass point are you trying to make? You appear to be making pro mass immigration arguments. Stop trying to do "anti-woke" DIE.
What do you hope to achieve with any of the shit you say?
I don't oppose mass immigration, I oppose any immigration. So that argument is not pro-immigration, let alone pro-mass immigration. Opposing unrealistic schemes that aren't even good is not supporting immigration.
Or do you want to go to war with all your minorities simultaneously? You'd be forgetting the old maxim of divide and conquer when it's handed to you on a silver platter.
Persuading people of my point of view. Which has a use. "These people have bad politics" has little use.
Oh god he's doing it again.
This is a sperg alert.
Don't be so hard on yourself.
Mexicans turned california solid blue after reagan betrayed the usa by giving amneaty to those vermin. They vote over 80% democrst. Sikhs and asian vote 80% democrat too so fuck them.
Why is blm and laraza allowed to be promoted by democrats but its bad when Whites band together you democrat shareblue bot?
You worship black and latino nationalists but get mad about muh white nationalists abd then proceed to defend groups who vote 80-90% (blacks, sikhs, asians, latinos) democrat. Fuck off
But they'll defend their huwite neighbors if you are friendly with them!
they won't
Your opinion is worth even less than a Democrat. kek.
Oh some britfag decided his dumbfuck uneducated opinion on my country meant something? Ha.
Anyways, I can see why you're jerking off minorities, most of your nation is brown now in major cities. Bunch of fucking do nothing cucks.
Some people here have issues, and don't wind yourself too much about it. That's what you get when you allow free speech, even for the worst people. Although regardless of where we are from, we can always learn from the mistakes and experiences of people in other places.
The white nationalists are extreme end of the right so the issues of the right are even more prominent, same with the left and the far left.
The right has an issue of not 'stooping to their enemies level' whether by tactics or by pressure used. This is shown by the recent Budweiser boycott as how many conservatives said 'don't engage in the same cancel culture'
While the far left have their purity spiral, the far right have the same thing but in terms or racial or religion believing that one race or religion should dominate an area. This obviously means that they lose potential alliances against the sane enemy.
Me, I'll use what I can, who I can. If I can get the Muslims on board to attack the left by showing them the books they'll try to 'teach' kids with, I'll do that. If I want to get the Asians on board by saying the left will take away their cute Kpop/Jpop idols and replace them with landwhales, I'll do that. I want to win as to lose means literal hell on earth.
Pay attention to everyone who countersignalled the Budcott, these are the same useless pieces of shit who refuse to defend our vanguard against Antifa counterprotests. They'd rather grift as the Titanic sinks than right the ship. They'd rather lose with principles than win, even though losing means their principles become illegal and the victors write them as ultimate evil in history books.
I can't imagine that they actually believe that, and that they don't say this for ulterior motives. Cancel culture is an attempt to silence people from speaking out about their opinions. It certainly is not cancel culture to ask that corporations you pay don't hate you.
At the very least, being too loud about that is putting the cart beyond the horse. I don't believe in racial politics, but I do believe that a state should be based on certain values, and the grooming the past few years have convinced me that Christian values dominating society isn't the worst it can get (though I am an atheist).
But it's stupid to come out for that right now. That is not how leftists won the culture, they won it incrementally.
The right also has a problem of bragging. Whenever a rightist does the smallest thing, he's bragging to high heaven that he has changed everything. Whenever a leftist forces enormous social changes through your throat, he argues that it's not happening and that it's great that it is.
So no change?
No worse, they take away even our 2D waifus and force us to jerk off to landwhales.
Don't think I've ever heard them moan about Asians, because 90% of Asians are productive, good people who want to live well and make money and be safe.
The rest are indians.
New euphemism just dropped
Overstimulated Jogger
I’ve been saying for a while now going out of your way this hard to not mention them being black makes it extremely obvious they are so you may as well just say it.
The jannies don't like it when you call them that, hence the need for euphemisms like jogger, scholar, feral homeless, etc.
'Chimp out' was not allowed on Reddit, but while I'm not privy to any inside information, I doubt very much that it is disallowed here.
They are all black so at most they will try to spin this as white supremacy like they did with those black cops
Can't wait to see the explanations of how, by the special color magic these vigilantes possess, stomping and kicking the head of a prone man is obviously a safer method of restraint than a calm headlock.
Asians have always been honorary Aryans
Good grief. Stun batons are going to become a required fashion accessory for public transportation at some point. From the video it looks like fellow urbanites jumped and subdued him so I can't imagine there's going to be much noise about this one.
Damn. That dude was strong. At least 3 other black guys tried to subdue him. Its kinda funny those 2 vested people didnt do anything.
I kinda wish there was a death here just to see media and people reaction. But we all know that news will say "its different", but odds are just ignore like every black on black deaths.
This seems less "vigilante" and more "made the wrong guys mad and got his ass handed to him". It looked like one of the attackers tried to steal the shoes off the shirtless guy.