This stuff was virtually unsayable for the last two years, but now as we near the start of the next US election cycle, suddenly, it is allowed to be talked about.
My theory: The media will now begin concede to the dangers of the vaccine, remind everyone who it was that initiated Operation Warp Speed, and use Trump's unshakable commitment to the vax as a means to hang him. They will hold him response for vax injuries, deaths, sterilizations and the future of cancers and shortened lifespans, and completely memoryhole the fact that it was the left who pushed for vaccine mandates/passports/etc.
Not easy when business and politics don't reward admitting mistakes. Not to mention he constantly got bogarded on everything else he tried to do. That said, the way things are going economically, all he has to do is ask people "remember what you paid for gas under me? Remember how cheap eggs were under me?"
He could get around it fairly easily. The contracts he signed and had pharma sign were to waive the usual FDA screening process in order to deliver "safe and effective" vaccines. That language was literally in the OWS contracts. That's not what the pharmaceutical companies delivered, and so they violated those contracts. Not his fault.
I'm still a Trump supporter, but I don't think he's doing himself any favors by clinging to the pro-vaccine narrative.
They’ll dust off the old clips of Biden and Kamala being skeptical of the vaccines as “proof” that we were always at war with EastAsia they were always against the jabs. Add in the clips of Trump crowing about Warp Speed, and they have all the narrative that they need. It’s reminiscent of how they claimed to have always been against defunding the police.
This is pretty much the gist of it right here. Even though this all happened 2-3 years ago, when it comes time to vote it will be 4 years and most of the US will forget Biden and Fauchi played a huge part in the vaccination rollout. They will forget because their attention span was destroyed through TikTok and Twitter.
They will forget because their attention span was destroyed through TikTok and Twitter.
It's worse than that. They will forget because roughly two thirds of people will believe literally anything if they hear it repeated often enough for long enough.
And I'm OK with that. Trump and his spawn have thrown in with big pharma, Disney, Anheuser-Busch and all the usual groomer perverts. Plus he's still surrounding himself with the same swamp creatures that knifed him in the back last time.
He needs to retire, go play golf and shit post on social media.
Trumps a boomer. I believe he truly had a good heart and intention about it but gave up when he realized it would be difficult and he'd be ostracized if he tried. When it was easy and he was surrounded by supporters, I believe he meant ever word but when he crossed over into DC, it wasn't a popular idea.
Almost no world leaders got it, which is why they covered up the Princess in Vietnam I think who is in a coma from it.
I want to say Vietnam, it was one of the countries around there. Notice how quickly that dropped out of the news? Pretty sure she is either dead now or still in that coma.
FactCheck.org did a fact check claiming it to be false which essentially verifies it as true.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
Does this mean that the Kansas School Sports Act does require genital inspections.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
It was all denied, most of all claims that Thailand was suing Pfizer or putting a stop to it, or whatever people fantasized. It's certainly not impossible that something happened due to a vaccine, but you need more evidence than a post hoc. Particularly when a lot of nonsense (some about people who died years before the vaccine) is spread with claims of "DIED SUDDENLY".
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
Do you suppose they would attack people any less intensely if it weren't the vaccine? This all seems to be a whole lot of wishful thinking. Like the elaborate fantasy that is the present thread.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
And even if one were done, people would just claim that the autopsy doctor was bribed. Not that I have a lot of faith in autopsy doctors to begin with, see the George Floyd one who said that he'd have called it an overdose if he had died at home.
Don't get me wrong, while I am not anti-coronavirus vaccine, I'm sure that there's a whole lot of shenanigans going on regarding this vaccine. Like the text messages between Von der Leyen and Pfizer. But that is no reason to start believing stuff with no evidence.
See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?
Excess death numbers are not something countries can juke...too much. I don't trust any data the US puts out, so you can ignore them completely. Australia as well, Oceania and China don't even bother with. Totally inaccurate.
Israel's data is actually pretty good, or most of it. Germany produces accurate data as well, and their insurance industry is going apeshit trying to explain away the increase in deaths.
The excess deaths aren't just more elderly dying, it is excess across all age groups...that took the shot.
In continents like Africa the excess death figures are in line with most years, especially once you pull out the violent deaths.
US figures are so broken that basing anything on them is pointless. It's unbelievable data manipulation across an entire industry, largely because they flooded people with money for COVID deaths.
mRNA was an industry that was flooded with money and showed no success. All the Phase 3 trials failed but investors were anxious. Those investors included the NiH and US Government.
There is a good reason why the most dangerous mRNA shots were in the same batches. Given the production size that shouldn't have happened the way it did, VAERS gave us incredibly valuable data about which batches were causing the reactions because it showed us that depending on your batch number there was a statistically significant change in negative effects.
It is standard procedure in the experimental phase to test different formulas to try and pinpoint the safest. You just don't see it done on humans...at least not until recently.
You can also take a look at Pfizers new drug development, within the past few years they have started developing drugs specifically for the side effects of the mRNA shot, giving them a huge advantage compared to other companies who weren't aware that these medicines would be needed.
It is easy to be skeptical considering the lack of useful, physical evidence to validate many of these theories. So demand the information to test them, don't dismiss the theories. Everything I listed here is provable.
This stuff was virtually unsayable for the last two years, but now as we near the start of the next US election cycle, suddenly, it is allowed to be talked about.
My theory: The media will now begin concede to the dangers of the vaccine, remind everyone who it was that initiated Operation Warp Speed, and use Trump's unshakable commitment to the vax as a means to hang him. They will hold him response for vax injuries, deaths, sterilizations and the future of cancers and shortened lifespans, and completely memoryhole the fact that it was the left who pushed for vaccine mandates/passports/etc.
They will.
But also trump needs to not pretend like the shots were good
Impossible.
That's also sadly true
That would require him to admit he ever made a single mistake in his whole life.
Not easy when business and politics don't reward admitting mistakes. Not to mention he constantly got bogarded on everything else he tried to do. That said, the way things are going economically, all he has to do is ask people "remember what you paid for gas under me? Remember how cheap eggs were under me?"
He could get around it fairly easily. The contracts he signed and had pharma sign were to waive the usual FDA screening process in order to deliver "safe and effective" vaccines. That language was literally in the OWS contracts. That's not what the pharmaceutical companies delivered, and so they violated those contracts. Not his fault.
I'm still a Trump supporter, but I don't think he's doing himself any favors by clinging to the pro-vaccine narrative.
He also has way too much ego to ever admit his fuck ups.
We're going to lose, because trump cultists can't accept anyone other than trump and his shit.
Trump having an ego? Surely, you jest.
They’ll dust off the old clips of Biden and Kamala being skeptical of the vaccines as “proof” that
we were always at war with EastAsiathey were always against the jabs. Add in the clips of Trump crowing about Warp Speed, and they have all the narrative that they need. It’s reminiscent of how they claimed to have always been against defunding the police.This is pretty much the gist of it right here. Even though this all happened 2-3 years ago, when it comes time to vote it will be 4 years and most of the US will forget Biden and Fauchi played a huge part in the vaccination rollout. They will forget because their attention span was destroyed through TikTok and Twitter.
It's worse than that. They will forget because roughly two thirds of people will believe literally anything if they hear it repeated often enough for long enough.
And I'm OK with that. Trump and his spawn have thrown in with big pharma, Disney, Anheuser-Busch and all the usual groomer perverts. Plus he's still surrounding himself with the same swamp creatures that knifed him in the back last time.
He needs to retire, go play golf and shit post on social media.
Trumps a boomer. I believe he truly had a good heart and intention about it but gave up when he realized it would be difficult and he'd be ostracized if he tried. When it was easy and he was surrounded by supporters, I believe he meant ever word but when he crossed over into DC, it wasn't a popular idea.
Almost no world leaders got it, which is why they covered up the Princess in Vietnam I think who is in a coma from it.
I want to say Vietnam, it was one of the countries around there. Notice how quickly that dropped out of the news? Pretty sure she is either dead now or still in that coma.
Oh, so the prince, then....
Thailand, brah. Vietnam doesn't have a royal family.
i dont think its Vietnam, Vietnam doesn't have a royal family anymore because they're communist
I doubt any world leaders ever got the polio one either.
Did any actual proof ever surface for that Thailand thing?
FactCheck.org did a fact check claiming it to be false which essentially verifies it as true.
But yes, it happened immediately after the shot, she has no pre-existing conditions and what they are 'claiming' happened to her was rejected by physicians in Thailand, but this was all back in January.
Considering how intensely they buried the story and attacked anyone who suggested it was the shot I'd guarantee it was.
We won't get any evidence unti the autopsy and somehow I think the royal family will get a fat check to not have one done.
I opened the very first item on FactCheck.org
Does this mean that the Kansas School Sports Act does require genital inspections.
It was all denied, most of all claims that Thailand was suing Pfizer or putting a stop to it, or whatever people fantasized. It's certainly not impossible that something happened due to a vaccine, but you need more evidence than a post hoc. Particularly when a lot of nonsense (some about people who died years before the vaccine) is spread with claims of "DIED SUDDENLY".
Do you suppose they would attack people any less intensely if it weren't the vaccine? This all seems to be a whole lot of wishful thinking. Like the elaborate fantasy that is the present thread.
And even if one were done, people would just claim that the autopsy doctor was bribed. Not that I have a lot of faith in autopsy doctors to begin with, see the George Floyd one who said that he'd have called it an overdose if he had died at home.
Don't get me wrong, while I am not anti-coronavirus vaccine, I'm sure that there's a whole lot of shenanigans going on regarding this vaccine. Like the text messages between Von der Leyen and Pfizer. But that is no reason to start believing stuff with no evidence.
See the problem is that they suddenly lumped in the question of "did the shot cause the heart issue or was it coincidence" with "Thailand is banning the shot."
They tied them together mainly so the fact checkers could say 'false' since they attached a fake story to a real question. That's a big red flag, since generally they only take this extra step if they REALLY want to say something is false but can't.
Thailand suing Pfizer / dropping the shots / etc. were not ever meant to be serious arguments, just distractions from the issue.
It will take years, probably decades, before any properly run studies are done. Expecting that at this point is crazy, the testable and provable evidence that would show exactly what caused her heart damage is a long way away from existing. I'd love to have it, but it doesn't exist and won't until the people who made these decisions are 'safe' from the repercussions. The media is complicit so they aren't investigating and censorship is increasingly rapidly against citizen journalists.
I have a high burden of proof and used to think just like you but over the last few years it is unrealistic to expect medical evidence of anything related to mRNA technology. It just doesn't exist, nobody is pursuing it and nobody is allowing anyone to post their findings regarding it. THAT is the scariest thing about these stories.
We know for a certainty that excess mortality is increasing around the world focused on the countries with high mRNA rates though so it isn't really a question about whether it is dangerous, we know it is. The question is whether this is the worse it gets or the tip of the iceberg.
FWIW, I heard it from people who were critical of the vaccine.
If it doesn't happen soon, it will never happen. Because people will lose interest. I have barely even heard about corona for the past year.
Pfizer and Big Pharma are powerful, but I think a lot of people overestimate the amount of power that they actually have. They're not controlling all the bureaucracies in the world. Especially when there are those out there who are shilling competing products, like Russia, China, Cuba.
It's the old "if the moon landing were faked, the USSR would have pointed it out" argument.
There certainly are a lot of things that are questionable. For example, why did they push mRNA technology on the West? They said because they could easily make new vaccines for new variants, but we all know how they didn't for years. And countries that used traditional techniques came up with vaccines even faster.
I think the explanation is more mundane than anything: this was a golden opportunity to use people's panics as a way to get them to use mRNA when people normally wouldn't.
I'm not at all certain that "we know" that. Nearly all Western countries used mRNA. So what valid country to compare it with is there? And is there evidence that countries with lower vaccine uptake did better?
Excess death numbers are not something countries can juke...too much. I don't trust any data the US puts out, so you can ignore them completely. Australia as well, Oceania and China don't even bother with. Totally inaccurate.
Israel's data is actually pretty good, or most of it. Germany produces accurate data as well, and their insurance industry is going apeshit trying to explain away the increase in deaths.
The excess deaths aren't just more elderly dying, it is excess across all age groups...that took the shot.
In continents like Africa the excess death figures are in line with most years, especially once you pull out the violent deaths.
US figures are so broken that basing anything on them is pointless. It's unbelievable data manipulation across an entire industry, largely because they flooded people with money for COVID deaths.
mRNA was an industry that was flooded with money and showed no success. All the Phase 3 trials failed but investors were anxious. Those investors included the NiH and US Government.
There is a good reason why the most dangerous mRNA shots were in the same batches. Given the production size that shouldn't have happened the way it did, VAERS gave us incredibly valuable data about which batches were causing the reactions because it showed us that depending on your batch number there was a statistically significant change in negative effects.
It is standard procedure in the experimental phase to test different formulas to try and pinpoint the safest. You just don't see it done on humans...at least not until recently.
You can also take a look at Pfizers new drug development, within the past few years they have started developing drugs specifically for the side effects of the mRNA shot, giving them a huge advantage compared to other companies who weren't aware that these medicines would be needed.
It is easy to be skeptical considering the lack of useful, physical evidence to validate many of these theories. So demand the information to test them, don't dismiss the theories. Everything I listed here is provable.
Lol, no refunds.
Sounds about right. Bureaucracy is old greek, which means western civilization has had it for a long time.
I feel kind of bad for him but they all but wrote it in large letters on the side of every building:
"We're going to kill (or sterilize) most of you idiots and make a shit ton of money doing it".
This minister: ' ok guys, we're all doing it right?'
Everyone else: 'of course, we'll do it right after, don't worry'
After months of health problems: ' YOU BASTARDS!'
The news are old, from last year, the guy only appears in fake news websites and Emmanuel Macron said long ago that he is vaccinated.
French President Emmanuel Macron said in a tweet that he has been vaccinated for COVID-19
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-france-macron-idUSP6N2MJ02R
Oh he said so?? Well, then it’s settled lol
1/3 of vials were saline
Can you tell me what the fake news websites are? You know, just so I can avoid them.
Thanks.
DuckDuckGo this guys name regarding Covid, all of the sites where he is listed are fake news.